about
A methodology to evaluate differential costs of full field digital as compared to conventional screen film mammography in a clinical setting.Mammographic density: Comparison of visual assessment with fully automatic calculation on a multivendor dataset.Pre-operative prediction of invasive vs intraductal breast cancer type: multivariate analysis of the accuracy of clinical and imaging findings.Comparison of two commercial systems for computer-assisted detection (CAD) as an aid to interpreting screening mammograms.Negligible advantages and excess costs of routine addition of breast ultrasonography to mammography in dense breasts.Non-malignant breast papillary lesions - b3 diagnosed on ultrasound--guided 14-gauge needle core biopsy: analysis of 114 cases from a single institution and review of the literature.[The assessment of the impact of a double reading by expert readers in a mass mammographic study][Incidental findings during ultrasound screening in breast carcinoma]The cytopathology of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. A detailed analysis of fine needle aspiration cytology of 58 cases compared with 101 invasive ductal carcinomasComparison of standard reading and computer aided diagnosis (CAD) on a proficiency test of screening mammographyAccuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of axillary lymph nodes as a triage test in breast cancer stagingAccuracy and underestimation of malignancy of breast core needle biopsy: the Florence experience of over 4000 consecutive biopsiesReal-time reading in mammography breast screeningRole of ultrasound-guided fine needle cytology of axillary lymph nodes in breast carcinoma stagingReader variability in reporting breast imaging according to BI-RADS assessment categories (the Florence experience)Benign breast diseases in breast cancer screening programs in Italy (2000-2001)Accuracy of needle biopsy of breast lesions visible on ultrasound: audit of fine needle versus core needle biopsy in 3233 consecutive samplings with ascertained outcomesNipple discharge after nipple-sparing mastectomy: should the areola complex always be removed?Needle core biopsy should replace fine needle aspiration cytology in ultrasound-guided sampling of breast lesions
P50
Q33223933-859771C8-A8B8-47B4-9D59-5AE926C78EB1Q35619641-576991E7-C331-4311-B4C7-BAE8C8DA8B86Q35668594-D3E83880-E762-4B74-BCFD-6E7C27EA7BD8Q35803733-6A15AA32-4484-46C9-BCDE-1EBFD0936D90Q37109367-8F19D574-6E60-47B9-82F5-EBF806C213DAQ38312351-C0A7F8FA-D4AD-4684-B8EE-0D376D8FC079Q52926985-99971B4D-F187-4C40-95A9-320CF229FD35Q57648407-AB85B8B4-5332-4298-964D-0A20C6DBAC9DQ73706907-10C239FE-F3EB-49C8-BD9B-628398956FA0Q73891689-7A87602C-B74A-4959-BC7D-D135FDEB723AQ79222942-19AE2228-953B-41AD-88DA-B51E4B5520EEQ79846085-CF012D46-0748-4547-8F78-F69F8A156161Q79955106-7C8D510E-0352-4770-8784-1A003D922AB4Q80961946-D02A0780-35A5-4FC7-A5C0-93861F51F920Q80995775-BD7A96ED-A7CF-4061-B692-612BB116CE35Q81511631-6794773B-19BA-4A44-B9E5-E5869FEA70B1Q82530912-DAB83035-4819-4F4C-B7FF-2A91D90BF2EAQ84508611-1C10D397-B766-4F84-99B3-E04BC97AC1ECQ84608572-64A04611-D73E-4300-B7AE-509046AA7E00
P50
description
researcher
@en
name
Beniamino Brancato
@en
Brancato B
@nl
type
label
Beniamino Brancato
@en
Brancato B
@nl
altLabel
Brancato B
@en
prefLabel
Beniamino Brancato
@en
Brancato B
@nl
P106
P31
P496
0000-0003-4050-9613