about
Comparison of the Trachway video intubating stylet and Macintosh laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation. Preliminary data.Comparison of the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with standard manual chest compressions and the use of TrueCPR and PocketCPR feedback devices.Inter-center comparison of EasyTube and endotracheal tube during general anesthesia in minor elective surgeryComparison of four different intraosseous access devices during simulated pediatric resuscitation. A randomized crossover manikin trialExchange of supraglottic airways for endotracheal tube using the Eschmann Introducer during simulated child resuscitation: A randomized study comparing 4 devices.Chest injuries based on medical rescue team data.Comparison of the TruView PCD video laryngoscope and macintosh laryngoscope for pediatric tracheal intubation by novice paramedics: a randomized crossover simulation trialCan the ETView VivaSight SL Rival Conventional Intubation Using the Macintosh Laryngoscope During Adult Resuscitation by Novice Physicians?: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study.Comparison of Coopdech®, CoPilot®, Intubrite®, and Macintosh laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized, controlled crossover simulation trialAssessment of Arterial Stiffness, Volume, and Nutritional Status in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients.A Randomized Cadaver Study Comparing First-Attempt Success Between Tibial and Humeral Intraosseous Insertions Using NIO Device by Paramedics: A Preliminary Investigation.A comparison of a traditional endotracheal tube versus ETView SL in endotracheal intubation during different emergency conditions: A randomized, crossover cadaver trial.Comparison of 3 Times a Week 4- and 5-Hour In-Center Hemodialysis Sessions with Use of Continuous Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring.Assessment of Volumetric Hemodynamic Parameters and Body Composition in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients.Child endotracheal intubation with a Clarus Levitan fiberoptic stylet vs Macintosh laryngoscope during resuscitation performed by paramedics: a randomized crossover manikin trial.Contribution of volume overload to the arterial stiffness of hemodialysis patients.A randomized comparison of the Laryngoscope with Fiber Optic Reusable Flexible Tip English Macintosh blade to the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation in simulated easy and difficult child airway with chest compression scenarios.A randomized comparison of three chest compression techniques and associated hemodynamic effect during infant CPR: A randomized manikin study.Performance of the MDRD, CKD-EPI, and Cockcroft-Gault Formulas in Relation to Nutritional Status in Stable Renal Transplant Recipients.Short Text Messages (SMS) as an Additional Tool for Notifying Medical Staff in Case of a Hospital Mass Casualty Incident.Head Trauma in Elderly Patients: Mechanisms of Injuries and CT Findings.Comparison of the ETView Single Lumen and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in an airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by novice paramedics: A randomized crossover manikin trial.A comparison of McGrath MAC® and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin studyEvaluation of a newly developed infant chest compression technique: A randomized crossover manikin trial.C-MAC compared with direct laryngoscopy for intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: A manikin trial.A comparison of the McGrath-MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for child tracheal intubation during resuscitation by paramedics. A randomized, crossover, manikin study.Glove failure in elective thyroid surgery: A prospective randomized study.Comparison of 3 different intraosseous access devices for adult during resuscitation. Randomized crossover manikin study.The evaluation of readiness of medical personnel to act under conditions of chemical contamination.Epidemiology of cranio-cerebral injuries in emergency medical services practice.Can GlideScope® videolaryngoscope be an alternative to direct laryngoscopy for child and infant tracheal intubation during chest compression?Are nurses able to perform blind intubation? Randomized comparison of I-gel and laryngeal mask airway.A comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope and blind intubation via I-gel in intubating an entrapped patient: A randomized crossover manikin study.Comparison of Macintosh and Intubrite laryngoscopes for orotracheal intubation by nurses during resuscitation: preliminary data of a randomized crossover simulation-based study.Success of intraosseous access procedure in simulated adult resuscitation.Fluid resuscitation in Ebola Virus Disease: Witch method of intravascular access choice?Are firefighters able to recognize ventricular fibrillation? Preliminary data.Does the Venner A.P. Advance video laryngoscope improve success of first intubation attempt of trauma patient?Comparison of four laryngoscopes in cervical immobilization scenario. Pilot data.Tracheal intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope with and without chest compressions, performed by nurses.
P50
Q31149593-B734E6A7-4545-4376-AC0C-429EA6071CF1Q33443688-9BC13CA2-E9CB-4A4C-B140-286390B17B9FQ33757860-C0E94526-178D-4642-A6D4-B8E5EB83BD22Q33840855-FA9FE62D-E640-4CC0-807B-9E542E3A4DC8Q33879650-F5C9AAA2-34CE-406D-BF94-10F7EAD9ACE8Q34327043-B9E7A329-3E19-4507-9AD2-095A8D3372CAQ36073564-6930EE10-175F-4586-BFA6-7168BFCE922EQ36193921-3BB640C0-1CC4-4DA2-9725-C7882D9D31DBQ36214903-5CF4FE3B-4E01-4B4D-8B1E-1B9A32E12CEFQ36581199-4AD166E7-9D1F-4B41-99E4-0E9AA6810F3AQ36993187-2AE777DC-B523-4607-8D03-9FD3DC5DF785Q38384521-57DBC6D3-F13E-47B0-ADC6-CE7CA3C2CACCQ38742070-DBD026EE-15BD-425B-8372-AC3A75008308Q38857434-86B5D52C-7694-4109-BB1F-89738781B146Q38978688-90C67CD3-4E04-4319-ABBE-4A566EB46B9DQ39001512-1ABD5A11-6EDF-4022-B6BB-8ECB65B6655AQ39011506-5B889DA4-AAF7-4F1A-856A-907A42A003B3Q39156644-FE1F64EA-01A3-4A1A-8C23-81463EBFE02CQ39518573-E3D0188B-B236-4C5A-A723-E3F0076F923EQ40443569-511B4B95-0D39-448C-BB16-BA7AEF5B600EQ40974008-B981C716-7AF7-40F4-B9D6-46FFFE27C533Q41785235-334C0564-DF2B-4831-9253-355BB8965C2EQ41789643-E2337B71-4630-41A4-9CB3-387B2CBDFDF0Q41932250-0F84A297-FD1E-46B1-86AF-E47BDF428E03Q41932788-09832D63-B4BF-49EE-B87D-30D9669EAFC8Q41949644-7E51451E-4111-41CB-9816-105C329E8947Q41953386-F1D80844-31DB-4BE2-B722-30AFE5981C2BQ41958279-D6576F2A-21B2-4B74-8453-876E1D6F1962Q41961439-1C0C85C9-4787-403B-ABEA-FE9E62FE901BQ41977342-304E827C-EE3C-45D1-B1EC-D68D6796559FQ42415363-230AAE70-ABE2-4634-A6F4-03F350281868Q43357021-62B796E5-1A2E-414A-942C-ADD67C2E8DB4Q43357693-D7532A4C-F625-42D9-B7FF-49BE7E801448Q43756385-F662A847-844B-486E-9CED-32F2047645D2Q43833345-ACDEEE7F-5359-4411-9549-B1871132941AQ44103592-91383BF7-7290-47DB-A20C-881A2C6DCC82Q44337123-B18A3D3B-1850-4233-BD4F-2424CD5B569CQ44340502-5C6F3A6F-A4EF-46B8-B15B-B45040DB26BFQ44377734-0CA74799-1014-450E-8C89-81A63A69C680Q44537894-83FD18F3-43DE-4FB1-A737-3E6421011A26
P50
description
investigador
@es
researcher
@en
wetenschapper
@nl
name
Łukasz Szarpak
@en
Łukasz Szarpak
@nl
type
label
Łukasz Szarpak
@en
Łukasz Szarpak
@nl
prefLabel
Łukasz Szarpak
@en
Łukasz Szarpak
@nl
P31
P496
0000-0002-0973-5455