Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998 - sprookjes - yvandenbroek - TriplyDB

Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998

Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q24555211

about

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke Converting systematic reviews to Cochrane format: a cross-sectional survey of Australian authors of systematic reviews The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration Comparison of treatment effect estimates for pharmacological randomized controlled trials enrolling older adults only and those including adults: a meta-epidemiological study Statistical Use in Clinical Studies: Is There Evidence of a Methodological Shift?The impact of Cochrane Systematic Reviews: a mixed method evaluation of outputs from Cochrane Review Groups supported by the UK National Institute for Health Research Hospital doctors' self-rated skills in and use of evidence-based medicine - a questionnaire survey.Methodological quality of systematic reviews of animal studies: a survey of reviews of basic research.Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study.Geographical representativeness of published and ongoing randomized controlled trials. The example of: Tobacco consumption and HIV infection.Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study Growth and decentralization of the medical literature: implications for evidence-based medicine.The Criticism Management System for the Cochrane Library.A comparison of the quality of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in paper-based journals.Quality of Cochrane reviews. Quality of Cochrane reviews is better than that of non-Cochrane reviews Mapping systematic reviews on atopic eczema--an essential resource for dermatology professionals and researchers.Effects of screening and systemic adjuvant therapy on ER-specific US breast cancer mortality.The Cochrane Collaboration and its contribution towards the management of allergic diseases.Methodological rigour and transparency of clinical practice guidelines developed by neurology professional societies in Croatia.Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review.Conclusiveness of the Cochrane reviews in gynaecological cancer: A systematic analysis.Methodological quality of meta-analyses: matched-pairs comparison over time and between industry-sponsored and academic-sponsored reports.A tool to assess the quality of a meta-analysis.Knowledge transfer in surgery: skills, process and evaluation.Evaluating the effectiveness of public health interventions: the role and activities of the Cochrane Collaboration.Systematic reviews on behavioural and psychological symptoms in the older or demented population Cochrane systematic reviews in the field of addiction: past and future.Systematic reviews in medical education: a practical approach: AMEE guide 94.Interventions for sustained healthcare professional behaviour change: a protocol for an overview of reviews.Risk of bias in overviews of reviews: a scoping review of methodological guidance and four-item checklist.Article from Clinical Evidence: Cochrane review on IV ?2 agonists for acute asthma was not mentioned.Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Systematic Reviews of Interventions for Postoperative Pain in Children: Comparison Against the Recommended Core Outcome Set.Role of Cochrane Reviews in informing US private payers' policies.Do Cochrane reviews provide useful information to guide policy and practice? The experience of the Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group Has Cochrane lost its way?

P2860

Q21092360-C46819E1-7ED3-4335-9C32-EB00321C4682 Q24202813-CE9EC972-71AE-4D79-89C6-AF4005992901 Q24798066-F6606A69-CC36-436A-B3C8-075A88613660 Q27860581-59B02089-30A4-4A36-9A45-90922519BCC0 Q28533341-4BAF3765-C8A5-407E-802B-7FE6F4CA000F Q28550147-C56BFD51-098A-421E-9B99-A8905AA05E70 Q28651730-DD88F841-9F27-443E-9205-C33C41192543 Q31076971-8F527A9D-A0B2-4581-93A9-B1122B18B0D0 Q33236268-3A1C3EA1-1B45-432D-BA50-5107D80C0CF4 Q33814405-55A591D5-2ABB-4785-A9D7-743A8F82742A Q33828691-9454F566-0A58-49B7-B921-541E6D5E1693 Q33829273-CE10B0B4-A85D-4870-B006-8C06C3EA007A Q34075873-EA7AD400-36D6-4648-B3E0-9EAD2290E320 Q34116200-C9A29295-0647-4F61-8656-D6E81D067B9F Q34545769-46A26AE5-060A-4554-8867-7F595A862FE2 Q34548715-57A73598-46D4-47C4-B45E-B12D5EC4CF10 Q34625848-5292B124-C247-42E0-A14B-D76D186EE67C Q34736052-B7A7CD6F-F301-41D1-9656-54A17CE2141B Q34830501-A7ABDC28-37A4-40DF-BFC3-9CA51A883BD9 Q34874773-6C03EB26-CA58-4A3F-97EC-9C3CCD9D1956 Q35082900-B0ADA144-415F-48C3-A27C-97949E5AF1FF Q35600621-4FDD2645-E82B-43B4-8D4B-C6B655282327 Q35656915-4FD1B064-C84A-4EA8-8813-EDF0EC7CF924 Q35656920-9AC093D3-D50A-4DF2-AA7F-CAF2CE306833 Q36323904-47D2A28E-3923-453C-829E-B083E0DA69A3 Q36421355-7280CE00-1CD9-470E-A136-72E9144298DD Q36424845-59C2F16A-5E04-4789-8C71-02AEFD7F18DA Q38170165-3053C2F8-B994-4D17-8473-69A0AA0978B0 Q38260148-3162084E-475F-4A40-AD99-4120D021FA59 Q38811953-8AA3CD3A-E25D-49DD-9205-2780A34721C4 Q39027809-17D9B236-04FF-4F7A-A139-C3222DB68B03 Q46045785-DF854547-856D-4CE4-8F97-38AAC78160F2 Q47649967-5E645F04-B2BD-4ED0-9E72-1606BE290178 Q49376570-AA45FE59-D87F-4499-92B6-BF385E3B4C25 Q57209643-F36077C1-F81F-4A8F-8910-5E3BE37631E0 Q60603546-77cfa841-4b7c-1e5d-67bb-ab12b5d6b146

P2860

Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q24555211

description

2001 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2001 թուականի Հոկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2001 թվականի հոտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2001年の論文

@ja

2001年論文

@yue

2001年論文

@zh-hant

2001年論文

@zh-hk

2001年論文

@zh-mo

2001年論文

@zh-tw

2001年论文

@wuu

name

Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998

@ast

Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998

@en

Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998

@nl

type

label

Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998

@ast

Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998

@en

Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998

@nl

prefLabel

Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998

@ast

Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998

@en

Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998

@nl

P1433

Q24555211-6F72B52C-1D85-47EB-848C-4D79CF91960A

P1476

Q24555211-ABD06B28-4883-4FB2-A21A-DEA2A4B558E1

P2093

Q24555211-056EEF1D-C0ED-45B6-8048-EB5E1AC6EB12

Q24555211-3EFE5870-5E6E-48AE-AF43-AA593D59982B

Q24555211-4E83B92D-379E-48D0-A979-906E973661AE

Q24555211-6CE6C279-247D-4EE8-AA3D-CDB1E8691EF6

Q24555211-7198D4E5-7411-4D60-A9B9-6DB16B37FEA8

Q24555211-89E996CE-D3BF-4B93-AE80-67BB2F9202A9

Q24555211-E4DCCDCE-D92B-4504-AA12-A213B2829F60

P2860

Q24555211-058DC03B-2DD3-4C0A-929B-5FD26E30AC0F

Q24555211-1CC8EEAD-89B8-4D2B-A568-260950CB13C6

Q24555211-249E9C6E-7C55-4E81-9EEE-004489437FFF

Q24555211-6A4BB77F-82C6-4A8E-B1E9-20E6184F7CA6

Q24555211-7005EA66-AF31-4F11-B4F9-0EEBE30F3148

Q24555211-80E92CC6-DBF9-46FF-BF81-63E89F1524D2

Q24555211-A1BA81AE-5E8A-4F21-B07C-1B8F45F0BB88

Q24555211-B13D9536-C54C-43F5-92A1-898B2C379ED7

Q24555211-D0919A8D-BF59-4A12-8277-A1DA66B7D1A9

Q24555211-D6DFC78E-D250-4DE5-9FFB-887423DCF1FE

P304

Q24555211-D4CBB09E-6C4C-426E-A17F-DCF00B091B35

P31

Q24555211-B7AF4356-F124-4B0E-88C4-7FEB7E6386EB

P3181

Q24555211-A978DF8E-5A9A-4638-A7F5-488BBB3692D5

P356

Q24555211-97C97522-C1FA-4000-9EC5-8760446F714D

P407

Q24555211-31188BDA-4C3B-41DD-AAC8-720761CE42CF

P433

Q24555211-47192FC9-5D40-440D-9F7F-0753C3FF8720

P478

Q24555211-EFFDC19C-65D1-42E0-9291-375A05FDB201

P50

Q24555211-220a2db2-4c86-af21-3b9d-2d71ede5c9f0

P577

Q24555211-4B8270E7-DD8C-4F8E-B8FC-2813E9F55FFA

P5875

Q24555211-3AF590D1-6423-4996-8B2F-46D998DC6E31

P698

Q24555211-851D61DA-CD8D-4562-A899-31A6B1172111

P932

Q24555211-FC45F9B7-1D66-4F35-97CF-074DC556FA5F

P3181

P356

BMJ.323.7317.829

P1433

P1476

Quality of Cochrane reviews: assessment of sample from 1998

@en

P2093

A Herxheimer

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

H McIntosh

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

J Ezzo

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

J Kleijnen

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

O Olsen

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P Middleton

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

V Hadhazy

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study

Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses on treatment of asthma: critical evaluation.

Guidelines for reading literature reviews.

The medical review article: state of the science.

Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.

Methodology and overt and hidden bias in reports of 196 double-blind trials of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis.

A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction.

P304

829-32

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P3181

2998768

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P356

10.1136/BMJ.323.7317.829

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

7317

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

323

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Peter C. Gøtzsche

P577

2001-10-13T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

11752106

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

11597965

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

57800

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string