Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review - sprookjes - yvandenbroek - TriplyDB

Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review

Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q26851424

about

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions The Use and Abuse of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Modulate Corticospinal Excitability in Humans Extent of non-publication in cohorts of studies approved by research ethics committees or included in trial registries How to make more published research true Barriers to and facilitators of interventions to counter publication bias: thematic analysis of scholarly articles and stakeholder interviews.Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention.Cause or Effect? Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Falls in Older Adults: A Systematic Review Conflicts of Interest, Selective Inertia, and Research Malpractice in Randomized Clinical Trials: An Unholy Trinity Effects of interventions on survival in acute respiratory distress syndrome: an umbrella review of 159 published randomized trials and 29 meta-analyses Conflict of interest disclosure in biomedical research: a review of current practices, biases, and the role of public registries in improving transparency Evidential Value That Exercise Improves BMI z-Score in Overweight and Obese Children and Adolescents A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of food safety education interventions for consumers in developed countries The misuse and abuse of statistics in biomedical research The place of experimental design and statistics in the 3Rs Why are medical and health-related studies not being published? A systematic review of reasons given by investigators Statistical and methodological considerations for reporting RCTs in medical literature Evidence for the selective reporting of analyses and discrepancies in clinical trials: a systematic review of cohort studies of clinical trials Questioning the dichotomy between vegetative state and minimally conscious state: a review of the statistical evidence.Published and unpublished evidence in coverage decision-making for pharmaceuticals in Europe: existing approaches and way forward.Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations Quality and quantity of information in summary basis of decision documents issued by health Canada Role of editorial and peer review processes in publication bias: analysis of drug trials submitted to eight medical journals Non-Publication Is Common among Phase 1, Single-Center, Not Prospectively Registered, or Early Terminated Clinical Drug Trials Outcome Reporting Bias in Government-Sponsored Policy Evaluations: A Qualitative Content Analysis of 13 Studies F1000Research: Tics welcomes you to 21st century biomedical publishing Credibility matters: mind the gap Core outcome sets for research and clinical practice.Adiposity and cancer at major anatomical sites: umbrella review of the literature Impact of searching clinical trial registries in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical treatments: methodological systematic review and reanalysis of meta-analyses A bibliometric review of drug and alcohol research focused on Indigenous peoples of Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the United States.Information on new drugs at market entry: retrospective analysis of health technology assessment reports versus regulatory reports, journal publications, and registry reports.Journal editors impasse with outcome reporting bias.Characterization of PET/CT images using texture analysis: the past, the present… any future?Uptake of systematic reviews and meta-analyses based on individual participant data in clinical practice guidelines: descriptive study.Physical Activity and White Matter Hyperintensities: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Studies Consent and confidentiality in the light of recent demands for data sharing.How Much Participant Outcome Data Is Missing from Sight: Findings from a Cohort of Trials Submitted to a German Research Ethics Committee.Has the Impact of Rising CO2 on Plants been Exaggerated by Meta-Analysis of Free Air CO2 Enrichment Studies?

P2860

Q21195843-A8D50A7D-AD9D-4A52-A3DE-93A6FB76CCE7 Q21775202-35A85069-E2BE-49BB-B6F8-27F5F60B3543 Q24193207-9F62747B-4476-49F8-B191-CE8231390427 Q24288646-D4F1EF4A-41D0-4E15-8476-8B879A48B4A8 Q24288672-28171B49-96A5-4003-BAC0-4D42C70DCECE Q24288766-214B95CF-F6FB-4728-9773-B684FB1C2E98 Q24288882-77E457D5-EDD0-4BCF-AC32-135E3FFD6146 Q24289398-D935DD0A-BA62-4020-A05E-9586FEF84755 Q24289445-B29A310C-A2CE-431E-B0CE-4740AC9CC244 Q24289463-2871552E-AAED-4F47-8E5B-2460D5D424F1 Q24289512-A811878C-83EA-4A0A-AB0B-B354A03BD970 Q24658631-C4C35068-157E-4F32-BC01-7472B6668D23 Q26778240-F35D84BB-446E-4CA0-A7F3-6F1D1E0BAED2 Q26797383-C9ECBD0E-A81E-4BC0-ACA7-89FEA01AE86C Q26853019-7B1C387F-A2F5-44AC-9B10-FEC2A15444A1 Q26853073-5316A2D1-1372-40B1-B42E-27A08FF2BCF6 Q26860988-C7FE1736-CD53-46D2-9361-1D76972A59DD Q26864374-A8F72A44-6809-4553-829A-DEB939B5163D Q26995587-E50DD4AC-DA0F-465A-8487-470B734C656F Q27008490-FE0CDD13-D775-4F72-BC00-8C10769663C6 Q27303825-A363C548-D0DD-4A5F-9F46-B06B2E52D38D Q27316649-F94E3169-04DB-41B8-9605-C08521350E62 Q28541228-24241ACA-5FAE-463D-ADF9-09A68E055450 Q28541821-23720B69-3646-4C22-89C4-1E9D1EEF1603 Q28555016-1F5A745F-A86A-4F6E-A3DC-EDAF62798D1C Q28598096-71B647C8-43E7-4C02-996C-03F87540BAB9 Q28652460-D3D22AE6-CC74-4D9F-B2E2-C36D9310491B Q28660574-15C7AB3E-77BC-42D6-B32C-724F065C8F7B Q30234594-C7CC39C1-4891-4E08-966D-36DD64C56A65 Q30235518-086FFD89-0267-4F3B-ADAD-16F53995F5AD Q30235881-A474CA09-5D5A-4338-BF6E-EB4A7D3E20C8 Q30400241-8E00E925-9BDE-4B4C-848E-B575AEB2E550 Q30487681-3E62576E-F1EB-4E6E-A2CA-D445F3910669 Q30488075-A7F6018A-B2AF-45ED-9B86-05612E21E1C0 Q30837034-BD64E6C3-2CA0-4FDA-976F-BC4D034B9CD9 Q30906124-0830BE27-6184-41A2-AC83-199EB05DF884 Q30966153-1B55F9D0-FF66-4408-B413-5619DA3B522F Q31042693-64A2D384-C245-4223-ABE0-ADA3D5553EBA Q31108775-408ED533-4914-40C3-9AC6-9CF426F0AFB9 Q31122224-FDCC41B6-4E89-4439-A3AD-062DCBDFF855

P2860

Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q26851424

description

2013 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2013 թուականի Յուլիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2013 թվականի հուլիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2013年の論文

@ja

2013年論文

@yue

2013年論文

@zh-hant

2013年論文

@zh-hk

2013年論文

@zh-mo

2013年論文

@zh-tw

2013年论文

@wuu

name

Systematic review of the empir ...... rting bias - an updated review

@ast

Systematic review of the empir ...... rting bias - an updated review

@en

Systematic review of the empir ...... rting bias - an updated review

@nl

type

label

Systematic review of the empir ...... rting bias - an updated review

@ast

Systematic review of the empir ...... rting bias - an updated review

@en

Systematic review of the empir ...... rting bias - an updated review

@nl

prefLabel

Systematic review of the empir ...... rting bias - an updated review

@ast

Systematic review of the empir ...... rting bias - an updated review

@en

Systematic review of the empir ...... rting bias - an updated review

@nl

P1433

Q26851424-83724023-7D91-4757-9F6E-6335D7AF2542

P1476

Q26851424-29531332-66B4-4730-9CE7-04DEB9E57E15

P2093

Q26851424-2DE3353E-41C7-49A1-9EAF-7FF2A2510A7A

Q26851424-B040C21A-F0C0-4511-86BF-A7C5227AF24C

P275

Q26851424-8AD5EA41-B5D8-4150-9BB1-E4E8761F252F

P2860

Q26851424-006E8CA5-C801-4639-B7B3-2A6EBFF14A90

Q26851424-025E1ED2-4ED7-491E-A149-C17E8576AC92

Q26851424-02951892-DC18-40F7-B046-8E54183C00A5

Q26851424-039ECF65-5532-4D65-BB8C-5EA6926FA6CE

Q26851424-1034899A-C7EA-43CA-80A3-D5EC72467DE8

Q26851424-11CA5F3E-DD1C-4074-8546-D5BCB16D098F

Q26851424-141F6E46-9500-4D77-A67B-CD6FF78C0B6C

Q26851424-14F05BD5-5AFE-453A-88C0-B86A0F1A5019

Q26851424-162E6D71-096D-490A-B1FD-1698270096AD

Q26851424-1DCA1C67-F87D-4869-9E1E-EA8E2A7D1CBF

P304

Q26851424-1D274E68-CCC7-443B-871E-783FCFC2C199

P31

Q26851424-073AAFA4-F499-424A-BB72-7E3EDE2F9BA3

Q26851424-287AD986-6C60-4BC3-93C4-6C2B034382D9

Q26851424-7929A3F8-29EB-45D2-9174-475C13AC2C70

Q26851424-b7504afc-ab3e-4356-8d57-b9835ced1ed5

P3181

Q26851424-F98D1B2D-2CFE-4005-A339-B54B27F3FED7

P356

Q26851424-5B106849-4B6D-40AE-ACE6-FD07F1894D0D

P407

Q26851424-9436BE3B-8C97-4B5F-9EBD-11D61C1D6FF3

P433

Q26851424-AEABE21A-0746-4E1D-816F-FF13BC799D1D

P478

Q26851424-8482147A-310E-45A6-A8EC-CD873B87EF1E

P50

Q26851424-1D706324-7B64-48EE-9DAA-3BC391147FC0

Q26851424-27EFA147-C3FB-4136-960C-CEAD94547FA1

P577

Q26851424-61245A6C-BCFC-4EC6-944D-C4B9207341A3

Q26851424-C229EB95-584C-4096-B29E-337C383CC546

P5875

Q26851424-6AD35A8C-C817-48C3-A5AF-670E1C1C64B2

P698

Q26851424-A1E1AB40-351C-4CAD-B770-ADE3F221E00D

P921

Q26851424-D2077D80-4175-4A6B-8583-AE9E09D0C8AE

Q26851424-E4C9CB06-B04F-4141-9412-3D1959DBF142

P932

Q26851424-5F69DA4A-3DFF-412E-9FE8-82C494BB085B

P3181

P356

JOURNAL.PONE.0066844

P1433

P1476

Systematic review of the empir ...... rting bias - an updated review

@en

P2093

Jamie J. Kirkham

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Kerry Dwan

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P275

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

P2860

Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy

Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials

Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results

Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts

Association of trial registration with the results and conclusions of published trials of new oncology drugs

Evolution of treatment effects over time: empirical insight from recursive cumulative metaanalyses

Outcome reporting among drug trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov

Publication bias in editorial decision making

Outcome reporting in industry-sponsored trials of gabapentin for off-label use

Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases

P304

e66844

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

systematic review

P3181

174804

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P356

10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0066844

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

7

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

8

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Paula Williamson

P577

2013-01-01T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

2013-07-05T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

259620143

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

23861749

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

P932

3702538

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string