Facilitated communication: rejected in science, accepted in court-a case study and analysis of the use of FC evidence under Frye and Daubert.
about
AAC Interventions for Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders: State of the Science and Future Research Directions.The moral obligation to be empirical: Comments on Boynton's “Facilitated Communication—what harm it can do: Confessions of a former facilitator”Facilitated communication: The empirical imperative to prevent further professional malpractice
P2860
Facilitated communication: rejected in science, accepted in court-a case study and analysis of the use of FC evidence under Frye and Daubert.
description
1999 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1999 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
1999 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
1999年の論文
@ja
1999年論文
@yue
1999年論文
@zh-hant
1999年論文
@zh-hk
1999年論文
@zh-mo
1999年論文
@zh-tw
1999年论文
@wuu
name
Facilitated communication: rej ...... idence under Frye and Daubert.
@ast
Facilitated communication: rej ...... idence under Frye and Daubert.
@en
type
label
Facilitated communication: rej ...... idence under Frye and Daubert.
@ast
Facilitated communication: rej ...... idence under Frye and Daubert.
@en
prefLabel
Facilitated communication: rej ...... idence under Frye and Daubert.
@ast
Facilitated communication: rej ...... idence under Frye and Daubert.
@en
P1476
Facilitated communication: rej ...... idence under Frye and Daubert.
@en
P2093
P304
P356
10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199910/12)17:4<517::AID-BSL362>3.0.CO;2-2
P577
1999-01-01T00:00:00Z