Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial.
about
Surgical treatments for vaginal apical prolapseSurgical Updates in the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Prevention and management of pelvic organ prolapse.Mesh sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Does pelvic floor muscle training augment the effect of surgery in women with pelvic organ prolapse? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.Characterization of the host inflammatory response following implantation of prolapse mesh in rhesus macaque.Quality of Life and Sexual Function 2 Years After Vaginal Surgery for Prolapse.The Design of a Randomized Trial of Vaginal Surgery for Uterovaginal Prolapse: Vaginal Hysterectomy With Native Tissue Vault Suspension Versus Mesh Hysteropexy Suspension (The Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures Randomized Trial)Diagnosis and Therapy of Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Guideline of the DGGG, SGGG and OEGGG (S2e-Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/006, April 2016).In vivo response to polypropylene following implantation in animal models: a review of biocompatibilityManagement of apical pelvic organ prolapse.The efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Robotic Sacrocolpopexy-Is It the Treatment of Choice for Advanced Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse?Cumulative Incidence of a Subsequent Surgery After Stress Urinary Incontinence and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Procedure.Apical sling: an approach to posthysterectomy vault prolapse.Native tissue repair for central compartment prolapse: a narrative review.Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse.Ligament shortening compared to vaginal colpopexy at the time of hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.Hysterectomy in the Urologist's Practice.Native Tissue Repairs for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Postoperative appointments: which ones count?Comparison of complications and prolapse recurrence between laparoscopic and vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for the treatment of vaginal prolapse.Long-term outcome of native tissue reconstructive vaginal surgery for advanced pelvic organ prolapse at 86 months: Hysterectomy versus hysteropexy.Methods for a multicenter randomized trial for mixed urinary incontinence: rationale and patient-centeredness of the ESTEEM trial.Perioperative Behavioral Therapy and Pelvic Muscle Strengthening Do Not Enhance Quality of Life After Pelvic Surgery: Secondary Report of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Concomitant Anterior Repair, Preoperative Prolapse Severity, and Anatomic Prolapse Outcomes After Vaginal Apical Procedures.A descriptive study on the efficacy and complications of the Capio (Boston Scientific) suturing device for sacrospinous ligament fixation.Is Pelvic-Floor Muscle Training a Physical Therapy or a Behavioral Therapy? A Call to Name and Report the Physical, Cognitive, and Behavioral Elements.Surgical Outcomes After Apical Repair for Vault Compared With Uterovaginal Prolapse.Structural, Functional, and Symptomatic Differences between Women with Rectocele versus Cystocele and Normal Support.Procedure Choice in Primary Versus Recurrent Prolapse: A Study of Fellowship-Trained Surgeons.Proximity of uterosacral ligament suspension sutures and S3 sacral nerve to pelvic landmarks.Role of concurrent vaginal hysterectomy in the outcomes of mesh-based vaginal pelvic organ prolapse surgery.Interactions among pelvic organ protrusion, levator ani descent, and hiatal enlargement in women with and without prolapse.Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical TTechnique of extraperitoneal uterosacral ligament suspension for apical suspension.Responsibility toward affordable healthcare: disposable versus reusable methods for pelvic floor repair
P2860
Q26741323-24AF2E22-DFD1-4DCF-A5F3-631ED25C8AF4Q33633394-A93C900E-649B-4751-A0FF-D7D84BE564ABQ34201944-EC7AF371-5316-441E-BE3A-15ABA20EBD43Q35156270-1B488651-C052-410B-97E1-FCF904DFCE5BQ35619986-12182B95-5130-4B83-8028-3A77C663B71AQ35881662-E695490A-1211-4D24-AE7A-5EA46FDF4086Q36244904-D2697FEF-4BE1-40DE-954F-7B2474E6AB6FQ36932617-0DD1B0A7-D6DE-4E79-A57F-078F43E999B7Q37033826-325149B6-630A-4275-A890-2C4CCDBB6CF9Q37540353-7852EC7F-2B44-410A-ABBB-817D329FE1B3Q37639259-C073533A-C34B-4D19-990B-FFB4DD511086Q38421376-9AFD000D-6C27-4026-8485-7919619943A3Q38592972-88A50551-46EB-4516-B201-2DEBF5140479Q38674417-67BD1FF5-45E9-4E43-AB98-CC6363D6FB0CQ38795807-FDF6E843-039C-450E-BFAA-D38D5E577674Q38799921-AD876030-78AA-44A4-B52A-9E6181B47CF4Q38840899-0EA6419A-299E-4435-9ACE-C1CD37A446EDQ38970649-D1026428-C639-48B4-BB9A-7E3487773F1FQ39011691-BA2A935B-1EBF-410E-B171-4EC13A42ABF1Q39108647-2AEE5994-EA9B-40F1-982A-87B8AF9055CAQ39117151-358ADCA4-0B58-4EBE-A557-E1244234B2B3Q39677786-E2A22361-4A4D-4DA8-9A53-5396594272F0Q40219971-7286035F-201D-49D9-9BD0-CCC4F51BC683Q40266329-2795A4A9-7E2E-4BBE-ACD0-4D11759ACE3FQ41644524-64BF9281-6BD9-4345-8DFD-5F21935814F2Q46122589-9DDB7272-863A-4A58-B00D-BCF8D70C7BD6Q47324428-46C7A733-BF98-41D7-A340-4A594E5AFF39Q47568500-E8CC793A-5F29-4DF4-BEE7-DB4373121AE5Q47765281-D7E5407E-6B8D-495F-B082-BCCBF486E47CQ50053667-5C090EFE-3E38-46DA-9F87-3B5E0A891B60Q50154068-BC7002A9-EE96-465D-B2BA-2A2871AE062EQ50535846-ED9DF428-85D5-4083-818D-9882963B27FDQ50895782-CC8FE18E-7EE5-45D0-A6CC-A65F1D2BA977Q50951597-20B3EC7A-9602-4400-99AD-057176321A0AQ51826746-CC63B4FB-300D-4A75-99DC-D92B7CDEF458Q53072596-8A75F34A-DD65-4CEA-8D9D-44FB98D4D0EFQ53267812-4162BA7F-3DDB-457D-B8EF-5FD207F4977CQ58544296-3993AD4A-BF76-42A2-8FD9-EC8CBB365B88
P2860
Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse: the OPTIMAL randomized trial.
description
2014 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2014 թուականի Մարտին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2014 թվականի մարտին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2014年の論文
@ja
2014年論文
@yue
2014年論文
@zh-hant
2014年論文
@zh-hk
2014年論文
@zh-mo
2014年論文
@zh-tw
2014年论文
@wuu
name
Comparison of 2 transvaginal s ...... the OPTIMAL randomized trial.
@ast
Comparison of 2 transvaginal s ...... the OPTIMAL randomized trial.
@en
type
label
Comparison of 2 transvaginal s ...... the OPTIMAL randomized trial.
@ast
Comparison of 2 transvaginal s ...... the OPTIMAL randomized trial.
@en
prefLabel
Comparison of 2 transvaginal s ...... the OPTIMAL randomized trial.
@ast
Comparison of 2 transvaginal s ...... the OPTIMAL randomized trial.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Comparison of 2 transvaginal s ...... the OPTIMAL randomized trial.
@en
P2093
Alison C Weidner
Cathie Spino
Diane Borello-France
Emily S Lukacz
Eunice Kennedy Shriver Nationa ...... Pelvic Floor Disorders Network
Holly E Richter
Ingrid Nygaard
John N Nguyen
Joseph Schaffer
Kathryn L Burgio
P2860
P304
P356
10.1001/JAMA.2014.1719
P407
P577
2014-03-01T00:00:00Z