Assessing decisional capacity for clinical research or treatment: a review of instruments.
about
Audio-visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trialsComputerized assessment of competence-related abilities in living liver donors: the Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study.The recovery of factors associated with decision-making capacity in individuals with psychosis.Consent processes in cluster-randomised trials in residential facilities for older adults: a systematic review of reporting practices and proposed guidelines.Neuropsychology, social cognition and global functioning among bipolar, schizophrenic patients and healthy controls: preliminary dataEnhancing Medical Decision-Making Evaluations: Introduction of Normative Data for the Capacity to Consent to Treatment Instrument.Assessment of the capacity to consent to treatment in patients admitted to acute medical wards.Autonomy in Depressive Patients Undergoing DBS-Treatment: Informed Consent, Freedom of Will and DBS' Potential to Restore ItContrasting the ethical perspectives of biospecimen research among individuals with familial risk for hereditary cancer and biomedical researchers: implications for researcher training.An update on the diagnosis and management of dementing conditionsTheoretical model of critical issues in informed consent in HIV vaccine trialsThe ethics of sham surgery on research subjects with cognitive impairments that affect decision-making capacity.Capacity to make medical treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis: a potentially remediable deficit.Assessing children's competence to consent in research by a standardized tool: a validity studyComparison between a standardized questionnaire and expert clinicians for capacity assessment in stroke clinical trials.Medical patients' treatment decision making capacity: a report from a general hospital in Greece.Developing a Tool to Assess Competency to Consent to Psychiatric Hospitalization (KATOC): Reliability and ValidityInformed consent in the psychosis prodrome: ethical, procedural and cultural considerations.Longitudinal consent-related abilities among research participants with schizophrenia: results from the CATIE study.Research involving subjects with Alzheimer's disease in Italy: the possible role of family members.Adolescent decision making about participation in a hypothetical HIV vaccine trialSchizophrenia in late life: emerging issuesEthical issues in naturalistic versus controlled trialsWhy is it hard to make progress in assessing children's decision-making competence?Informed consent in psychiatry clinical research: A conceptual review of issues, challenges, and recommendationsPrevalence and correlates of adequate performance on a measure of abilities related to decisional capacity: differences among three standards for the MacCAT-CR in patients with schizophrenia.Participants with schizophrenia retain the information necessary for informed consent during clinical trials.Addressing risks to advance mental health research.Undetected cognitive impairment and decision-making capacity in patients receiving hospice care.Fluctuating capacity and advance decision-making in Bipolar Affective Disorder - Self-binding directives and self-determination.Screening for understanding of research in the inpatient psychiatry setting.Medical decisional capacity among children with HIVInformed consent in dental care and research for the older adult population: A systematic review.Magnitude of impairment in decisional capacity in people with schizophrenia compared to normal subjects: an overview.Ethics in Psychiatric Research: A Review of 25 Years of NIH-funded Empirical Research Projects.Cross-Cultural Adaptations of the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment in IranTherapeutic misconception in research subjects: development and validation of a measureVariable judgments of decisional capacity in cognitively impaired research subjects.Relationship of individual cognitive abilities to specific components of decisional capacity among middle-aged and older patients with schizophrenia."...because I am something special" or "I think I will be something like a guinea pig": information and assent of legal minors in clinical trials--assessment of understanding, appreciation and reasoning.
P2860
Q24194724-D103B2ED-0EC0-47A7-A051-004252008BDBQ30411906-04B5F87F-B1E7-4D80-A32E-74C98D2ED3ABQ30491687-96835A93-BAA6-4395-8288-025936EBD8DFQ30541453-98B35E31-58BE-4D44-9103-FCFA462A0AC0Q30681799-402C8373-E962-4065-B651-BD91DCF70CB3Q30987834-383F7820-BDCD-472C-9482-553ACC7B6B95Q33499530-F3363EA5-B46B-4D5F-8D64-CD2C385BA72AQ33774713-885180F4-D5BA-4134-A554-04B90B179B62Q33888377-B111F087-F446-427D-9396-0EBD464AFCDEQ33896147-24A8EC0A-5DD1-43D8-B712-71E4609FDACCQ34005683-39D8AE2F-5586-4E9F-9FFA-2025614F1BC3Q34091937-844FB88E-999D-4473-9C52-A45710F891B1Q34166453-CCA2F43C-B80B-48DD-925B-7589A2798E00Q34420860-A1B4743E-D421-45F9-A551-1CD9CF28AAC5Q34421689-26D00B1A-74D9-481A-A389-524B993EC95DQ34659432-FADF9A31-F499-4551-AA11-CAAFEF06489AQ34811976-519D73F0-749B-44F4-8FBA-6ECBEFD4FEF1Q34896751-10F64550-CDB5-4D87-8548-050C77B54D88Q35115704-C23933F1-6CA3-4D02-816A-BE148101C72CQ35170180-0B473717-97BD-49A0-BFBB-79292049EB9AQ35232408-789D9006-38C2-4BB2-BCE8-305ABDF1B1C7Q35236677-D4E4099B-8C7A-4885-B03B-177482B48CE7Q35237336-3AFDEFCA-5A35-4537-9467-60A52352587EQ35541114-F8639E95-4F1C-4570-A201-26A1AF0795C4Q35746362-E11C2068-95CE-42EF-AA40-2F8D35247597Q35747875-95476E37-C115-4649-A142-E9DA45AC0333Q35785918-298C832C-342A-4463-831B-254CBBE3655FQ35786243-F6F9EA1C-3F41-46AE-B801-23B260937504Q35842954-4BBF5B39-69A2-42F2-99D7-1DEBB522314DQ35855984-A8D41738-0DE8-4F0A-86E1-D917EF18A4C2Q35975887-DE2C4A5B-E7E2-4503-AD10-2E9B7805992FQ36086679-A02BEFB2-C3ED-4E42-B0D5-0B869E8F39DBQ36243897-7FB3F7C9-A672-4689-9CD7-6421AF57A59FQ36271472-1BC869E7-8289-45E5-BE5E-0A175248255CQ36473380-B2D2AEA6-4A41-4F02-8654-84B629BBA9EAQ36859687-AABC74C7-4E29-4B79-A805-80AD666C4911Q36949383-1BC06BA4-88C0-4D8E-ABD5-78EBF08DA69DQ37003582-A7DED42C-AAA7-4614-9E27-62305F18223EQ37075730-575A2487-42E9-4575-9270-E9B836980279Q37092890-D5B60498-E4E3-44DA-8015-62E94C529420
P2860
Assessing decisional capacity for clinical research or treatment: a review of instruments.
description
2006 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2006 թուականի Օգոստոսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2006 թվականի օգոստոսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2006年の論文
@ja
2006年論文
@yue
2006年論文
@zh-hant
2006年論文
@zh-hk
2006年論文
@zh-mo
2006年論文
@zh-tw
2006年论文
@wuu
name
Assessing decisional capacity ...... ment: a review of instruments.
@ast
Assessing decisional capacity ...... ment: a review of instruments.
@en
Assessing decisional capacity ...... ment: a review of instruments.
@nl
type
label
Assessing decisional capacity ...... ment: a review of instruments.
@ast
Assessing decisional capacity ...... ment: a review of instruments.
@en
Assessing decisional capacity ...... ment: a review of instruments.
@nl
prefLabel
Assessing decisional capacity ...... ment: a review of instruments.
@ast
Assessing decisional capacity ...... ment: a review of instruments.
@en
Assessing decisional capacity ...... ment: a review of instruments.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Assessing decisional capacity ...... ment: a review of instruments.
@en
P2093
Elyn R Saks
Laura B Dunn
Milap A Nowrangi
P304
P356
10.1176/AJP.2006.163.8.1323
P407
P577
2006-08-01T00:00:00Z