A prospective randomised study of anatomical single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system.
about
Electromagnetic tracking of the pivot-shiftComparison of single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after a minimum of 3-year follow-up: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsTwenty-Year Experience of a Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionSingle-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an up-to-date meta-analysisAn interview with Michael Carmont, section editor for the surgery, traumatology, and rehabilitation section on sports traumatology research: acute, overuse and chronic problems, early return to play and long-term outcomes.Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Current Concepts and Future PerspectiveIs double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction superior to single-bundle? A comprehensive systematic review.Anatomic single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a meta-analysis.A novel tool for objective assessment of femorotibial rotation: a cadaver study.Practicability for robot-aided measurement of knee stability in-vivoA tale of 10 European centres - 2010 APOSSM travelling fellowship review in ACL surgeryEffects of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on in vivo, dynamic knee function.Arthroscopic anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Our experience with follow-up of 4 years.Application of a computerised navigation technique to assist arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionCurrent practice variations in the management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in CroatiaAnatomical single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 1: Basic science.Dynamic knee laxity measurement devices.Quantitative measurement of the pivot shift, reliability, and clinical applications.Pivot shift as an outcome measure for ACL reconstruction: a systematic review.Clinical outcomes of double- vs single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of randomized control trials.Double-bundle reconstruction results in superior clinical outcome than single-bundle reconstruction.Quantifying the pivot shift test: a systematic review.A systematic review of single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction using the anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction scoring checklist.Description of an evaluation system for knee kinematics in ligament lesions, by means of optical tracking and 3D tomography.Best one hundred papers of International Orthopaedics: a bibliometric analysis.Comparison Between Single- and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With 6- to 8-Stranded Hamstring Autograft: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial.Standardized pivot shift test improves measurement accuracy.Double bundle arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament reconstruction with remnant preserving technique using a hamstring autograftUse of inertial sensors to predict pivot-shift grade and diagnose an ACL injury during preoperative testing.Three-dimensional anatomic evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament for planning reconstruction.Hypertrophied cruciate ligament in high performance weightlifters observed in magnetic resonance imaging.An international survey on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practices.Anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in Asian population.Use of a gyroscope sensor to quantify tibial motions during a pivot shift test.Progression of osteoarthritis after double- and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study with 5-year results.Intercondylar notch size influences cyclops formation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Area of the tibial insertion site of the anterior cruciate ligament as a predictor for graft size.Anatomic double bundle ACL reconstruction outperforms any types of single bundle ACL reconstructions in controlling dynamic rotational laxity.
P2860
Q26752336-48ED5B19-3065-43BD-B4FB-69128AADA530Q26775456-9EF9A173-E62D-4E21-A254-56CCE27FA71BQ26798422-0C7E5E98-7573-4688-9338-18FC37BD177EQ26824932-9E0EBB87-FF32-44B5-9ED0-F26F01BC0547Q34655193-AD07DE8A-6AD3-42E2-B879-9DBD0DED1343Q34977900-2120648A-0598-4B88-88CB-D849E01A4E54Q34987523-0ABFCBD7-3AC8-41F5-9011-F49F5A906118Q35068622-7C571A22-0913-47AB-BE6E-3A1B37C90352Q35355200-8D67A950-898D-4FB8-99C4-A3692745EB66Q35860524-4F7E3498-7022-4271-BDF5-51A12635D742Q36405422-34A1A588-DEA7-4AE2-A331-D8FC14A48480Q36430183-8A59D58D-780F-4A14-9613-07923FACF307Q36527674-447F4DF3-F3D8-423B-A57F-9508B26093C0Q36577976-2D691196-41C1-44E0-AA07-BF3ADE22AA76Q37241303-4C9B45CA-13CD-41E7-BB88-7DB763E44647Q37873406-2C1A46AF-D824-47B7-B91A-E7F5DB38F4F5Q37877442-F30232CC-3B08-4F69-B2E7-9236B13ECC6CQ37972578-C336F394-C569-410F-B109-5E2CB807B6F7Q37972579-10E294B0-66A4-48A0-892A-C0F7B7F84F35Q37973277-967619F6-D489-4CDA-B373-0442FC21CE9EQ37979880-9D2F3E2C-E34A-4658-8D7E-613A0840E31BQ38016737-614FE7E7-D59A-4E05-A586-E9B9CCF6C858Q38086012-EC5E6DEA-9A4B-4A95-AF0D-FE87EB0BF44DQ38262678-6391D391-E451-4CA9-A5B4-06B2D36FAF6EQ38979129-1CDAF414-C6CE-4816-AF89-98CA8AD19D6AQ39039160-5FEF3044-72D8-4C7A-BE59-C78247DAF2ACQ39655953-88ED62A4-1D44-4700-A77C-365A3EC874BCQ39671297-5B5B3B0B-CAF6-4CAC-9C1B-F366451BC631Q41460162-647B6D1E-A041-4AB0-A394-EC6E7AE0CC6FQ41542547-B50CCCA2-2FC3-4904-B8A6-AA949C7B0B17Q41845529-8CF9CC8C-64AE-49D4-9E11-8398C2189354Q42503919-CD155955-FCFD-4ECF-904F-1CA1DAC8595BQ43109658-0E11A985-0D1D-4680-B020-0CBE77F7217CQ43855599-7D05FE83-5797-40C6-9785-C51F4A4199ADQ45340245-247367F4-7314-4F47-A161-970D06F7F62AQ46108443-A762F602-145B-4F5D-938C-906BA380FB0DQ46537795-ED441B96-298B-4FC8-9684-3763A31EC4A8Q47182962-2FBDA2A0-0B8A-4108-BC3B-6BF2145E8D6DQ47280498-FAF22F00-F7A9-4874-954A-69F52D79BDF5Q47346660-E058882A-9078-47BF-8F69-C1692A3402DD
P2860
A prospective randomised study of anatomical single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system.
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010 թուականի Օգոստոսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2010 թվականի օգոստոսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年論文
@yue
2010年論文
@zh-hant
2010年論文
@zh-hk
2010年論文
@zh-mo
2010年論文
@zh-tw
2010年论文
@wuu
name
A prospective randomised study ...... romagnetic measurement system.
@ast
A prospective randomised study ...... romagnetic measurement system.
@en
A prospective randomised study ...... romagnetic measurement system.
@nl
type
label
A prospective randomised study ...... romagnetic measurement system.
@ast
A prospective randomised study ...... romagnetic measurement system.
@en
A prospective randomised study ...... romagnetic measurement system.
@nl
prefLabel
A prospective randomised study ...... romagnetic measurement system.
@ast
A prospective randomised study ...... romagnetic measurement system.
@en
A prospective randomised study ...... romagnetic measurement system.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
A prospective randomised study ...... tromagnetic measurement system
@en
P2093
Daisuke Araki
Katsumasa Tei
Koji Nishimoto
Koki Nagamune
Masahiro Kurosaka
Norifumi Fujita
Ryosuke Kuroda
Seiji Kubo
Takehiko Matsushita
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S00264-010-1110-9
P577
2010-08-24T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1037923584