A survey of validity and utility of electronic patient records in a general practice.
about
The potential of electronic medical record systems to support quality improvement work and research in Norwegian general practiceThe diagnostic value of 11q13 amplification and protein expression in the detection of nodal metastasis from oral squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysisThe importance of validating the diagnosis of coronary heart disease when measuring secondary prevention: a cross-sectional study in general practiceMethods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical researchSystematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care.Comparing paper-based with electronic patient records: lessons learned during a study on diagnosis and procedure codesData quality of general practice electronic health records: the impact of a program of assessments, feedback, and trainingThe Challenges of Data Quality Evaluation in a Joint Data Warehouse.Data quality of electronic medical records in Manitoba: do problem lists accurately reflect chronic disease billing diagnoses?A New Paradigm to Analyze Data Completeness of Patient DataA valuable approach to the use of electronic medical data in primary care research: Panning for gold.A method for extracting electronic patient record data from practice management software systems used in veterinary practice.Improving management of hypertension in general practice: a randomised controlled trial of feedback derived from electronic patient data.Quality of medication use in primary care--mapping the problem, working to a solution: a systematic review of the literature.Validation of computerized diagnostic information in a clinical database from a national equine clinic network.The clinical and cost-effectiveness of stratified care for patients with sciatica: the SCOPiC randomised controlled trial protocol (ISRCTN75449581).Data quality in electronic medical records in Manitoba: Do problem lists reflect chronic disease as defined by prescriptions?Distinctiveness of psychological obstacles to recovery in low back pain patients in primary care.Affective concordance in couples: a cross-sectional analysis of depression and anxiety consultations within a population of 13,507 couples in primary care.Validating the 8 CPCSSN case definitions for chronic disease surveillance in a primary care database of electronic health recordsHow good are the data? Feasible approach to validation of metrics of quality derived from an outpatient electronic health record.Married couples' risk of same disease: cross sectional study.Potential application of item-response theory to interpretation of medical codes in electronic patient records.Treatment evolution after COPD diagnosis in the UK primary care setting.Patients' experiences when accessing their on-line electronic patient records in primary care.How accurate is diagnosis of asthma in a general practice database? A review of patients' notes and questionnaire-reported symptoms.Acute infections in primary care: accuracy of electronic diagnoses and electronic antibiotic prescribing.Identification and characteristics of victims of violence identified by emergency physicians, triage nurses, and the police.Use of an electronic medical record for the identification of research subjects with diabetes mellitus.Characteristics of patients with low back and leg pain seeking treatment in primary care: baseline results from the ATLAS cohort study.Should General Practitioners Issue a Sick Certificate to Employees Who Consult for Low Back Pain in Primary Care?The impact of treatment noncompliance on mortality in people with type 2 diabetes.Measuring disease prevalence: a comparison of musculoskeletal disease using four general practice consultation databases.The reporting and diagnosis of uterine fibroids in the UK: an observational studyThe barriers to clinical coding in general practice: a literature review.Understanding caseload and practice through analysis of therapeutic state transitionsIn sickness and in health: A cross-sectional analysis of concordance for musculoskeletal pain in 13,507 couples.Prognostic value of cardiovascular disease status: the Leiden 85-plus study.Accuracy of the Charlson index comorbidities derived from a hospital electronic database in a teaching hospital in Saudi ArabiaAppropriate utilization of clinical laboratory tests.
P2860
Q24803099-AF72990A-C6B2-45D0-B82A-AD9DBCA754CEQ26996809-AA08F1A6-A996-44D1-B434-68F3F0A7BE21Q28193491-90EF020D-3C08-41DF-AD07-E0FB34BFB96EQ29219377-37703121-BD83-4AFC-BD90-AEAC2A255A52Q30477862-FE0552B8-07E6-42FC-9724-F9CEDA3C7CA3Q30480815-23FFDE44-AFE1-41F8-82BA-6D6E542064A7Q30881618-2AE4DE5C-50D4-44BC-A622-215FE41D8173Q30988345-AC1C40F8-4D02-4428-8F39-8209A0794D5AQ31083613-BBC55C6A-9CFB-424B-9668-E33C6E194D9FQ31119177-11DF7569-E795-4698-97E2-1DBE4F12CC01Q31136299-C36809C8-987C-45DD-BDA2-2FB81F7CA66BQ31138123-7814C308-EAA0-4DFB-8E25-83F8546A5B14Q33212088-E24ED697-42EB-4FCE-ABDD-8D856203A96BQ33505780-6F7B1D34-D813-46EF-BC07-C9C098C9E6C6Q33570685-EC6C86F9-6B33-43D0-AA00-3FED34F645BCQ33604338-A47AC512-496B-42A9-85EB-5A92F6782FFBQ33675513-3DB9C151-0482-49A1-9AD8-759BE5A0E472Q33699371-C51EDD4F-B4B3-454B-89E2-78193CB3B138Q33709176-BB7382FC-EA5D-41D6-851E-9AD5B37745A9Q33895491-1743710E-59CE-4739-B144-2448646E3A94Q34021638-92D3E197-3201-4268-8A44-D5070DC991C5Q34093868-0357CEFD-508C-4910-95B8-9EA00CB6B57DQ34103844-A2D216A6-F08F-4931-B9FA-79BCE4D1AF7BQ34121263-814CA1CE-90EB-4178-8DB4-9F734B91057FQ34224678-4E94951A-5BE5-447D-B883-8B79A8F071B6Q34247870-FB197D6B-1E4E-44D9-A737-1C09210A3940Q34398638-CE7E84F3-EC94-4E06-B8C7-FA4024589295Q35557824-9E3B6343-1107-4B91-AF8B-9BBF8B6E43CDQ35758416-214A2AAB-DF56-48EE-9D0D-78BA3FFFF7BAQ35832796-77A22BD1-11DE-4B43-8605-DD981624792CQ35968050-EE33CA9C-5EC5-41CF-AA0E-935B009C20ACQ35976392-27D7C636-297F-48DB-ADE4-47DEE1A523A8Q36078500-643AEC38-5F86-496D-9BD1-B14E06CFF90EQ36085294-79D92A31-637B-4CE5-B582-038D418598A3Q36336587-0E89DBEE-F32A-489A-BD8D-FB96986FBD2EQ36508732-5FE77960-0FF6-4344-8413-2644BFA7117FQ36604154-1BC6D7D9-BEFC-46CA-B17C-E7897B1CF71EQ36993441-343CB34F-B969-4065-9947-1DD47071F2DCQ37007685-DBE400AF-79E2-4A41-8E81-C0993C22E8A6Q37622922-DC92F3A0-DF37-44CA-9CA9-5CD7EF5EB345
P2860
A survey of validity and utility of electronic patient records in a general practice.
description
2001 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2001年の論文
@ja
2001年論文
@yue
2001年論文
@zh-hant
2001年論文
@zh-hk
2001年論文
@zh-mo
2001年論文
@zh-tw
2001年论文
@wuu
2001年论文
@zh
2001年论文
@zh-cn
name
A survey of validity and utility of electronic patient records in a general practice.
@ast
A survey of validity and utility of electronic patient records in a general practice.
@en
type
label
A survey of validity and utility of electronic patient records in a general practice.
@ast
A survey of validity and utility of electronic patient records in a general practice.
@en
prefLabel
A survey of validity and utility of electronic patient records in a general practice.
@ast
A survey of validity and utility of electronic patient records in a general practice.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
A survey of validity and utility of electronic patient records in a general practice.
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P356
10.1136/BMJ.322.7299.1401
P407
P577
2001-06-01T00:00:00Z