Clinical trials registries are underused in the pregnancy and childbirth literature: a systematic review of the top 20 journals.

about

Clinical trials registries are underused in the pregnancy and childbirth literature: a systematic review of the top 20 journals.

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q36171533

description

2016 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2016年の論文

@ja

2016年論文

@yue

2016年論文

@zh-hant

2016年論文

@zh-hk

2016年論文

@zh-mo

2016年論文

@zh-tw

2016年论文

@wuu

2016年论文

@zh

2016年论文

@zh-cn

name

Clinical trials registries are ...... review of the top 20 journals.

@ast

Clinical trials registries are ...... review of the top 20 journals.

@en

type

Item

label

Clinical trials registries are ...... review of the top 20 journals.

@ast

Clinical trials registries are ...... review of the top 20 journals.

@en

prefLabel

Clinical trials registries are ...... review of the top 20 journals.

@ast

Clinical trials registries are ...... review of the top 20 journals.

@en

P1476

Clinical trials registries are ...... review of the top 20 journals.

@en

P2093

Branden K Carr

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Guy Sneed

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Matt Vassar

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Vadim V Yerokhin

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P275

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

P2860

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy

Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth

Barriers to and facilitators of interventions to counter publication bias: thematic analysis of scholarly articles and stakeholder interviews.

Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review

The influence of context on the effectiveness of hospital quality improvement strategies: a review of systematic reviews

When is birthweight at term abnormally low? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the association and predictive ability of current birthweight standards for neonatal outcomes

Inadequate use and regulation of interventions against publication bias decreases their effectiveness: a systematic review

Increasing the use of skilled health personnel where traditional birth attendants were providers of childbirth care: a systematic review

Maternal adverse effects of different antenatal magnesium sulphate regimens for improving maternal and infant outcomes: a systematic review

P2888

s13104-016-2280-3

P304

475

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

review article

P356

10.1186/S13104-016-2280-3

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Matt Vassar

P577

2016-10-21T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P6179

1014711259

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

27769265

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

biomedical investigative technique

P932

5073738

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string