A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome.
about
Workload and surgeonĀ“s specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgeryImpact of surgical volume of centers on post-operative outcomes from cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemoperfusionQuality assurance in the treatment of colorectal cancer: the EURECCA initiativeGuidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural mesotheliomaMeta-analysis of operative experiences of general surgery trainees during training.Child and Adolescent Health From 1990 to 2015: Findings From the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors 2015 Study.Oesophagectomy rates and post-resection outcomes in patients with cancer of the oesophagus and gastro-oesophageal junction: a population-based study using linked health administrative linked dataDo patient-reported outcomes offer a more sensitive method for comparing the outcomes of consultants than mortality? A multilevel analysis of routine data.Analysis of 30-day postdischarge morbidity and readmission after radical gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma: a single-center study of 2107 patients with prospective data.Minimum volume standards in German hospitals: do they get along with procedure centralization? A retrospective longitudinal data analysis.Validation of the board certification system for expert surgeons (hepato-biliary-pancreatic field) using the data of the National Clinical Database of Japan: part 2 - Pancreatoduodenectomy.Determinants of surgical decision making: a national survey.Surgical quality is more than volume: the association between changing urologists and complications for patients with localized prostate cancer.Do low-income coronary artery bypass surgery patients have equal opportunity to access excellent quality of care and enjoy good outcome in Taiwan?Mortality following acute pancreatitis: social deprivation, hospital size and time of admission: record linkage study.Achieving minimum caseload requirements: an analysis of hospital quality control reports from 2004-2010Can experience improve hospital management?Trends in the use and outcomes of ventricular assist devices among medicare beneficiaries, 2006 through 2011.The association of trauma center closures with increased inpatient mortality for injured patients.What are the safety risks for patients undergoing treatment by multiple specialties: a retrospective patient record review study.Outcome-volume relationships and transhiatal esophagectomy: minimizing "failure to rescue".Report from the OECI Oncology Days 2014Management of patients with retroperitoneal tumors and a review of the literatureTriage of high-risk surgical patients for intensive care.Collaboration Between Surgeons and Medical Oncologists and Outcomes for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer.Which Kind of Provider's Operation Volumes Matters? Associations between CABG Surgical Site Infection Risk and Hospital and Surgeon Operation Volumes among Medical Centers in Taiwan.A cross-specialty survey to assess the application of risk stratified surgery for differentiated thyroid cancer in the UK.Evolution in the management of Hirschsprung's disease in the UK and Ireland: a national survey of practice revisited.Racial disparities in changing to a high-volume urologist among men with localized prostate cancer.Do the Preferences of Healthcare Provider Selection Vary among Rural and Urban Patients with Different Income and Cause Different Outcome?Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: Comparison of a Program with Infectious Diseases Pharmacist Support to a Program with a Geographic Pharmacist Staffing ModelUpdate on Neoadjuvant Regimens for Patients with Operable Oesophageal/Gastrooesophageal Junction Adenocarcinomas and Squamous Cell CarcinomasVariation in treatment modalities, costs and outcomes of rectal cancer patients in Poland.Re-examining the significance of surgical volume to breast cancer survival and recurrence versus process quality of care in Taiwan.Vascularizing lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer: A single-institution experience.Can technical factors explain the volume-outcome relationship in gastric bypass surgery?Polypectomy techniques, endoscopist characteristics, and serious gastrointestinal adverse events.Association of polypectomy techniques, endoscopist volume, and facility type with colonoscopy complications.Surgeon training and use of radioactive iodine in stage I thyroid cancer patients.Combined Modality Management of Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: A Single-Institution Series of 121 Patients.
P2860
Q24201131-430EECCB-EEF0-4833-A35D-59581512FC8DQ26768302-A51E3B2D-5E50-42C5-8EF5-FA4AB29F6598Q26998562-F4D8A5D8-2078-45B5-B9B9-007221EC95D2Q28394028-B643664F-D8FF-47C0-B13D-4453166B25C4Q30239972-9178BB09-FC33-434D-80C1-26AE419092E6Q30252707-68A8E717-1C84-43AC-8956-AF88A774C393Q30576847-032C345D-A0E0-4130-81D8-FABE15701C1AQ30867369-0CA037AB-0461-475F-BB18-53DC2EA95224Q30912423-E2AB16EC-00AE-47B8-9BF2-BD3350952B7DQ30981907-2CD75DDA-72C0-4CD0-ACE2-220357081A71Q31060873-9F2CE4B4-B176-4126-B528-EACE388E520DQ33595586-663F7D06-BD71-4130-A0FB-89682A072A09Q33946732-B688E40B-0E47-4C5E-8877-03F8F37229FBQ34157059-4E7D5F57-0A58-492B-A65B-8BB6708BC62AQ34168749-E564DD4F-CE61-4AB1-9CC7-CE4F3E80F65EQ34192751-602C1AD0-FD57-478C-B851-81C6ED6737BAQ34243608-87001725-D877-40B1-A6E8-F00E443D8C7CQ34373693-A12395CE-C32D-4118-82F0-586495DA7BCCQ34443619-ECC184D8-DA85-4541-BBBD-A3A38FCB2FDBQ34454475-C457A6FA-DAEE-468A-85D7-EE0791EB1E57Q34787549-932BF72C-B019-42D8-BFC1-DC22056490C6Q35002560-722DCC61-7B67-415F-87F1-F17FF98B8463Q35504713-1512FF3C-FF5F-4035-A8BE-38FFEA4A9691Q35559669-C98A8F4A-BC63-4DDD-BAAD-72012E301735Q35625692-65C7A79B-0D27-43C8-A4F1-7AC3BE29B52BQ35656253-01875E33-D90B-450A-8FBA-27E9B8980713Q35760244-616EAD66-C770-4532-910D-15D503389DB5Q35801129-43C443C2-64F8-442A-AD07-14FE939964B4Q35819651-C8F58641-3CF6-4B5C-A5EC-538D15D7B5E8Q35982430-BEA5EA64-C2BF-40E2-973D-012B54B1CD7AQ36055001-06CB4C04-1ED5-4E3C-882F-B063B0F087F5Q36284695-CCA20308-0C08-4227-AEB0-C0EBA3216AF9Q36452898-2C2F8F52-D92D-46E4-9F55-0C8CEFD93E97Q36661465-643DAA7B-0402-480B-9651-2E6D45B3E9E9Q36747834-CB5F9510-BC71-4585-B364-B37998C5E5D5Q36777992-4FBE8F0C-8008-479B-97E2-EA215C76A8FDQ36855374-CF82181F-E4AD-454A-824E-DED9172AB09DQ36872656-49649549-CDC0-4CE2-B81E-C5D75105BA7BQ36886333-98B9507F-50A2-4F8B-B3C6-3A297F005EFBQ37055482-3B6FEACC-63D3-4BE4-B89B-5B35D7628D6A
P2860
A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome.
description
2007 nĆ® lÅ«n-bĆ»n
@nan
2007幓ć®č«ę
@ja
2007幓č«ę
@yue
2007幓č«ę
@zh-hant
2007幓č«ę
@zh-hk
2007幓č«ę
@zh-mo
2007幓č«ę
@zh-tw
2007幓č®ŗę
@wuu
2007幓č®ŗę
@zh
2007幓č®ŗę
@zh-cn
name
A systematic review of the imp ...... ialization on patient outcome.
@ast
A systematic review of the imp ...... ialization on patient outcome.
@en
type
label
A systematic review of the imp ...... ialization on patient outcome.
@ast
A systematic review of the imp ...... ialization on patient outcome.
@en
prefLabel
A systematic review of the imp ...... ialization on patient outcome.
@ast
A systematic review of the imp ...... ialization on patient outcome.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
A systematic review of the imp ...... ialization on patient outcome.
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P356
10.1002/BJS.5714
P407
P577
2007-02-01T00:00:00Z