Effectiveness of interspinous implant surgery in patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
about
The evidence on surgical interventions for low back disorders, an overview of systematic reviewsArguments for the choice of surgical treatments in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis - a systematic appraisal of randomized controlled trialsGrade 1 spondylolisthesis and interspinous device placement: removal in six patients and analysis of current dataOne-year follow-up of a series of 100 patients treated for lumbar spinal canal stenosis by means of HeliFix interspinous process decompression device.Comparison of the efficacy and safety between interspinous process distraction device and open decompression surgery in treating lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta analysis.Effectiveness of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysisThe Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2011.Efficacy and Safety of Mechanical Thrombectomy in Treating Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Meta Analysis.Calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonism for acute treatment of migraine: a meta-analysis.Interspinous spacers versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: a meta-analysis of prospective studies.Clinical evaluation of the preliminary safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive interspinous process device APERIUS(®) in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with symptomatic neurogenic intermittent claudication.Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treatment with Aperius™ PerCLID™ system and Falena® interspinous spacers: 1-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life.Percutaneous interspinous spacer versus open decompression: a 2-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life.Complications in degenerative lumbar disease treated with a dynamic interspinous spacer (Coflex).Motion characteristics of the lumbar spinous processes with degenerative disc disease and degenerative spondylolisthesisInterspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized controlled trial.The physical and psychological impact of neurogenic claudication: the patients' perspectives.The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2011.Mechanical low back pain--a rheumatologist's view.What interventions improve walking ability in neurogenic claudication with lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review.Comparison of one versus two cages in lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal disease: a meta-analysis.The effect of design parameters of interspinous implants on kinematics and load bearing: an in vitro study.Aperius interspinous device for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a review.The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European spine journal review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European spine journal, 2015.Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis.Clinical analysis following lumbar interspinous devices implant: where we are and where we go.Management of lumbar spinal stenosis: a survey among Dutch spine surgeons.Let’X-STOP with any “distraction” from the true problem: scenarios in which minimally invasive surgery is not welcome!IPD without bony decompression versus conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: 2-year results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial
P2860
Q26822782-F27AD89E-C235-450F-8060-854C84220486Q27022484-4A41E8A3-3546-40C1-9BD6-6614A007828DQ30934874-70376B34-F731-49A1-917E-B4A713FA4A2CQ33563220-BF03991E-28D7-4BF1-923D-C6159AEDA537Q35206955-63C049E4-6360-432D-8ED5-DFDF000CFF27Q35590183-7E84F1D3-2227-41BC-946A-3BC30C5EB3AFQ35693176-F794A123-0280-4F9F-9103-9306043B499EQ35772351-9FE47F96-F20B-4C1B-8416-6E2B924F1880Q35884646-BC85CB90-B831-43CE-A37D-814C5CD8DE8CQ35933301-F425B8CB-8810-4343-8EEC-A87BDA26B68EQ36428511-02A9758A-CB87-4675-9DD8-19F885F5FDB3Q37173805-31C8E708-6F5C-49FE-A9D3-A960FA763336Q37182471-E13C77E9-8F34-44FA-8B96-8D7014530DB6Q37300270-8A1667CF-8741-40D4-9502-1C565F4195F2Q37350561-DBBD81CC-5BC8-4BCA-A7B0-6C97A5962444Q37503616-BCB2BF08-7245-402C-B0C0-52CBDFF9E29AQ37738463-EC00B5DE-2E3B-43A0-85B6-9C02412D9697Q37972250-9419BF29-2771-40A3-BEB1-F88B081BFF9BQ38135705-50A7923B-B8C1-439D-B128-DE45D5BD9BE6Q38196341-AAE309B1-3CFB-458C-B426-9ECDEE26BE71Q38245385-60ACA89F-8E22-4E48-B383-8DE6C7C3E88EQ38366290-692D0C71-1745-4A9C-97AD-A4AE2CAF30DCQ38577790-EC1ED635-6A6B-4318-B16C-E78696A7AD37Q38687522-06C3D671-9695-41AB-A61F-FCFA3F18E736Q38995837-09496EC5-0263-4645-89CB-451F01F33C22Q46906923-7AC9D91F-1C2B-49BE-B4F3-030420660199Q53085961-B128EB6F-B614-451A-BA8A-88FDF2894991Q54986711-76B7519B-0F15-4641-8F89-5922CA55C7B3Q59114988-C2E2B5CF-D560-4881-8901-BACDBD23C290
P2860
Effectiveness of interspinous implant surgery in patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 11 June 2011
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Effectiveness of interspinous ...... atic review and meta-analysis.
@en
Effectiveness of interspinous ...... atic review and meta-analysis.
@nl
type
label
Effectiveness of interspinous ...... atic review and meta-analysis.
@en
Effectiveness of interspinous ...... atic review and meta-analysis.
@nl
prefLabel
Effectiveness of interspinous ...... atic review and meta-analysis.
@en
Effectiveness of interspinous ...... atic review and meta-analysis.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P921
P1476
Effectiveness of interspinous ...... matic review and meta-analysis
@en
P2093
Mark P Arts
Wilco C Peul
Wouter A Moojen
P2860
P2888
P304
P356
10.1007/S00586-011-1873-8
P577
2011-06-11T00:00:00Z