Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis.
about
Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in adult cancer treatment trialsDevelopment of a short form and scoring algorithm from the validated actionable bladder symptom screening tool.Toward mindfulness in quality-of-life research: perspectives on how to avoid rigor becoming rigidityComputer-delivered and web-based interventions to improve depression, anxiety, and psychological well-being of university students: a systematic review and meta-analysisHealth related quality of life after oesophagectomy: elderly patients refer similar eating and swallowing difficulties than younger patients.A mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing versus clinical assessment and non-invasive tests prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: the INVESTIGATE-I studyMeasuring Therapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Preliminary Development and Validation of the Treatment-Induced Neuropathy Assessment ScaleThe relationship between psychological distress and multiple tender points across the adult lifespan.Applying the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System to Assess Upper Extremity Function among Children with Congenital Hand DifferencesPsychometric Evaluation of Three Psychosocial Measures Associated With Physical Activity Among Adolescent Girls.Development of an International Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry.Establishing the Cultural Equivalence of the Young Children's Participation and Environment Measure (YC-PEM) for Use in Singapore.Assessment of anticancer-treatment outcome in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer-going beyond PSA and imaging, a systematic literature review.Study of physical function in adolescents with haemophilia: The SO-FIT study.The effects of using answer sheets on reported drug use and data quality in a classroom survey: A cluster-randomized study.The Impact of Respondent Burden on Current Drinker Rates.The Stressometer: A Simple, Valid, and Responsive Measure of Psychological Stress in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients.The role of narcissism in health-risk and health-protective behaviors.The Caregiver Contribution to Heart Failure Self-Care (CACHS): Further Psychometric Testing of a Novel Instrument.Resource-use measurement based on patient recall: issues and challenges for economic evaluation.Patient-Reported Outcome Assessments as Endpoints in Studies in Infectious Diseases.Development and validation of the brief esophageal dysphagia questionnaire.Patient-reported outcomes questionnaire compliance in Cancer Cooperative Group Trials (Alliance N0992).Recruiting and Assessing Recent Young Adult Latina Immigrants in Health Disparities Research.Utilization of Patient-Reported Outcomes to Guide Symptom Management during Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.Barriers experienced by patients with multiple sclerosis in seeking care for lower urinary tract symptoms.Psychometric Evaluation of Kingston Caregiver Stress Scale.When less is more: Psychometric properties of Norwegian short-forms of the Ambivalent Sexism Scales (ASI and AMI) and the Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance (IRMA) Scale.Validation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of a Chinese Version of the Emotional and Social Dysfunction Questionnaire in Stroke Patients.PROMIS measures can be used to assess symptoms and function in long-term hematopoietic cell transplantation survivors.Recommended Methods for the Collection of Health State Utility Value Evidence in Clinical Studies.Usefulness of self-report questionnaires for psychological assessment of patients with tinnitus and hyperacusis and patients' views of the questionnaires.Advancing the efficiency and efficacy of patient reported outcomes with multivariate computer adaptive testing.Development and feasibility of a web application to monitor patients' cancer-related pain.A systematic review of instruments for assessing parent satisfaction with family-centred care in neonatal intensive care units.Dysphagia in Multiple Sclerosis: Evaluation and Validation of the DYMUS Questionnaire.How much is too much? The effects of information quantity on crowdfunding performance.The Relational Aspects of Care Questionnaire: item reduction and scoring using inpatient and accident and emergency data in England.Self-reports from behind the scenes: Questionable research practices and rates of replication in ego depletion research.An examination of diurnal variations in neuropathic pain and affect, on exercise and non-exercise days, in adults with spinal cord injury
P2860
Q28655361-A5C74E32-1107-4ECD-B8B5-14A2D9752D84Q30541961-B05ACE24-B59E-454B-B28B-38821183D0F8Q33645286-8CA5DE45-59A5-4E9D-9B5B-C45766646BCFQ33734524-01AC9BD5-B6C8-4B30-BC8B-B57A94024236Q35782325-A3499880-8897-489C-A3B3-27AC919D1896Q36041073-4CF2DE81-96EF-4B2A-9D28-EF3BD9FAE118Q36117942-18ED96E4-AA45-4C9A-A383-3F77E45B2E33Q36559095-89DFF1DB-9D92-4B4C-9EBA-CC32D104BED6Q36702593-E5D66E8E-EDF4-4044-A506-8C36809019AFQ37625143-EC6BDD98-3B0D-4D40-8D80-D0F34D92C57AQ38382855-11419452-16ED-46A2-B81B-D3CF4E46B183Q38398743-724C4856-5CCE-44A2-8414-F5F307E67506Q38555581-E1059EE2-2C23-4735-9290-4277F47BFC24Q38625593-95B4116F-3D72-4D08-AED7-2950E3F72DE8Q38706700-A5F4BF50-10F8-4783-BBAA-EC1231F73101Q38756609-8B684BD7-0D01-409E-ACB9-DFA1A441F2E7Q38980010-600FD2B2-F994-48F2-AC29-B3C1EC45233FQ39037483-878C688E-618B-4244-BAF1-C58B5AE0745FQ39177471-59343C73-0174-48C5-827E-7321E032758FQ39445147-C5A6CA72-BE83-466E-BAE1-A66E7649AA08Q39534931-332C13D4-7623-431D-99CE-A81C284A4B17Q39629749-C628B8EE-1432-4838-A538-05951B8DF502Q39640851-37C44505-55F2-4747-9109-2E17049481FFQ40348919-4BF3AC56-FAF0-44B8-9F3C-FA7F04E3590BQ43271415-F33DE253-1A31-4EFC-AF17-6444542C9644Q46190605-46489E8C-5D4A-4DA0-A5EA-52ABF57728E0Q46307291-011AEE59-7CEF-4330-9E28-D81F9A64774AQ47250650-E34F83D6-4171-4D8B-9740-46F28C8E9C99Q47326516-983409B8-A323-4F4C-8BAC-E6B05F7083E4Q47588548-9EC7AE2D-DDB2-4CF0-AECD-0696F30A109EQ47755844-8888C2A1-CDD5-40C9-8A9B-6AF1B07D8E34Q47780418-87C71D1C-B6FE-43E9-A184-3B1A0ABDD459Q47896771-1AFA9CD0-138E-4C7F-B232-6F6D885F1182Q49515473-4069BAD3-BA32-4357-BD9F-7AF35E4B69EAQ49852478-D5F94FC1-2A55-4182-93D4-CC50C176330AQ49936531-F0A1C993-6FF2-45A0-BDC6-708F89A0F65FQ55214090-9097BC91-D274-45E7-8958-8E01726D4B8FQ55439599-BF6EF76C-C068-4901-906D-08D839358AAAQ55448568-5AC76FBE-63CE-4EB0-BB27-1A8DC2EFC174Q58603654-27869967-D969-44A2-B4CB-F41BEE93BE19
P2860
Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articol științific
@ro
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@gl
artigo científico
@pt
artigo científico
@pt-br
artikel ilmiah
@id
artikull shkencor
@sq
artículo científico
@es
name
Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis.
@en
Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis.
@nl
type
label
Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis.
@en
Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis.
@nl
prefLabel
Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis.
@en
Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis.
@nl
P1433
P1476
Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis.
@en
P2093
Anna Rydén
John Adler
P304
P356
10.1016/J.JVAL.2011.06.003
P577
2011-08-02T00:00:00Z