Systematic Reviews in Burns Care: Poor Quality and Getting Worse.
about
Poor methodological quality and reporting standards of systematic reviews in burn care management.Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences.Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR.
P2860
Systematic Reviews in Burns Care: Poor Quality and Getting Worse.
description
2017 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2017年の論文
@ja
2017年学术文章
@wuu
2017年学术文章
@zh-cn
2017年学术文章
@zh-hans
2017年学术文章
@zh-my
2017年学术文章
@zh-sg
2017年學術文章
@yue
2017年學術文章
@zh
2017年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Systematic Reviews in Burns Care: Poor Quality and Getting Worse.
@en
type
label
Systematic Reviews in Burns Care: Poor Quality and Getting Worse.
@en
prefLabel
Systematic Reviews in Burns Care: Poor Quality and Getting Worse.
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Systematic Reviews in Burns Care: Poor Quality and Getting Worse.
@en
P2093
Jared M Campbell
Rochelle Kurmis
Sheila Kavanagh
P2860
P304
P356
10.1097/BCR.0000000000000409
P50
P577
2017-03-01T00:00:00Z