Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification.
about
System-level approach needed to evaluate the transition to more sustainable agricultureProviding foraging resources for solitary bees on farmland: current schemes for pollinators benefit a limited suite of speciesSafeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being.Pollination Reservoirs in Lowbush Blueberry (Ericales: Ericaceae).Bumblebee family lineage survival is enhanced in high-quality landscapes.Ecological intensification to mitigate impacts of conventional intensive land use on pollinators and pollination.Establishing Wildflower Pollinator Habitats in Agricultural Farmland to Provide Multiple Ecosystem ServicesTemporally dependent pollinator competition and facilitation with mass flowering crops affects yield in co-blooming crops.Complementarity among natural enemies enhances pest suppression.Responses of Crop Pests and Natural Enemies to Wildflower Borders Depends on Functional Group.Florally rich habitats reduce insect pollination and the reproductive success of isolated plants.In-Field Habitat Management to Optimize Pest Control of Novel Soil Communities in Agroecosystems.Combined effects of agrochemicals and ecosystem services on crop yield across Europe.Ten policies for pollinators.Guidance to develop specific protection goals options for environmental risk assessment at EFSA, in relation to biodiversity and ecosystem servicesInvestigating the (Mis)Match between Natural Pest Control Knowledge and the Intensity of Pesticide Use.Fragmentation of nest and foraging habitat affects time budgets of solitary bees, their fitness and pollination services, depending on traits: Results from an individual-based model.Pollination benefits are maximized at intermediate nutrient levels.An analysis of the energetic reward offered by field bean (Vicia faba) flowers: Nectar, pollen, and operative force.Increasing plant diversity with border crops reduces insecticide use and increases crop yield in urban agriculture.Transdisciplinary weed research: new leverage on challenging weed problems?Benefits of increasing plant diversity in sustainable agroecosystemsContrasting beetle assemblage responses to cultivated farmlands and native woodlands in a dynamic agricultural landscapeActionable knowledge for ecological intensification of agricultureHow spatial scale shapes the generation and management of multiple ecosystem servicesThe LEGATO cross-disciplinary integrated ecosystem service research framework: an example of integrating research results from the analysis of global change impacts and the social, cultural and economic system dynamics of irrigated rice productionChanges in the frequency of common plant species across linear features in Wales from 1990 to 2016: implications for potential delivery of ecosystem servicesHigh cover of hedgerows in the landscape supports multiple ecosystem services in Mediterranean cereal fieldsSparing Land for Biodiversity at Multiple Spatial ScalesWild field edges keep yields up
P2860
Q28387444-F6DFE655-7619-40DA-9EB6-428B55596D15Q29399508-1AAC876A-4BF1-4041-A56D-6201D6A70DC9Q31145137-3AF6372B-136B-48FF-99E0-225E933FCCD2Q33552801-31356AB7-FF84-46E0-BCD8-AB38386B4B83Q36309447-014A1AC2-4468-4A16-9DBB-73A26F69364BQ36324180-95733BAC-38CC-4EBD-8248-5CDCA1A21F6FQ36724674-A45F7C4A-8EE3-49FD-84E2-95F6E945E3A6Q37721613-7CDFBEF6-38E0-440F-8E2C-05AF972717B4Q38623008-0521E437-A7BA-4C23-AF9C-E000EE559CFBQ38652735-A7267579-C0E1-439D-8C9B-E1FAA8AF47B0Q41546706-86FA856E-0B5C-4257-AB9C-82E28EEAF1F4Q42366951-E01740F7-A291-4738-A236-05886D42F799Q46307885-864AA858-B07E-4375-9EAB-7D3C7EAA0BBDQ46454941-99C84255-B755-4394-AC47-2DA9F15F4325Q47157831-C0FEC7EE-B9BD-48EC-AB72-117679BB09D2Q47205750-76A4E679-79B4-4A0E-B908-8AD341A4B9A9Q50000923-AB3FDE50-1F71-4B50-B6D7-BBE1FA87F55EQ51186866-F30DFB0E-0A5D-47D4-B458-366B30215A9CQ52614559-6E7C0B52-3561-432C-8C00-AA81812BDDA5Q54302443-BF848B98-91CB-4BC5-A534-39F00A2B8893Q56929325-F7401F22-06D3-44FC-894D-68BB86464FCAQ56937646-3E596FF1-04A6-4166-9D0A-D8AB49C015A6Q56983779-C5ACEF36-3AB4-41C5-9B27-9FA50F915107Q56984449-4D614B10-CBC7-41C5-BDFD-3F7FF1F92657Q57025633-565A4BB9-4DD5-4E48-AE89-E855B7241AEDQ57061055-4A63363F-0173-4FBA-B996-51ACD033692FQ57183542-F3B699AD-9EAB-452D-89FD-EFA42697D9CAQ57249323-3DFC0A6E-DD42-4C2E-BBCC-E172581D351AQ57898604-7D7190BC-832A-4864-A3B6-2BFACCB9965DQ74439620-0643AFC5-8141-4F16-8D8C-EB714849D634
P2860
Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification.
description
2015 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2015年の論文
@ja
2015年学术文章
@wuu
2015年学术文章
@zh
2015年学术文章
@zh-cn
2015年学术文章
@zh-hans
2015年学术文章
@zh-my
2015年学术文章
@zh-sg
2015年學術文章
@yue
2015年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification.
@en
Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification.
@nl
type
label
Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification.
@en
Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification.
@nl
prefLabel
Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification.
@en
Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Wildlife-friendly farming increases crop yield: evidence for ecological intensification.
@en
P2093
James M Bullock
Lucy Ridding
Marek Nowakowski
Matthew S Heard
Shelley Hinsley
P2860
P304
P356
10.1098/RSPB.2015.1740
P577
2015-10-01T00:00:00Z