Coleman v. Miller
Coleman v. Miller, 307 U.S. 433 (1939), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court which clarified that if the Congress of the United States—when proposing for ratification an amendment to the United States Constitution, pursuant to Article V thereof—chooses not to set a deadline by which the state legislatures of three-fourths of the states or, if prescribed by Congress State ratifying conventions in three-fourths of the states, must act upon the proposed amendment, then the proposed amendment remains pending business before the state legislatures (or ratifying conventions). The case centered on the Child Labor Amendment, which was proposed for ratification by Congress in 1924.
Wikipage redirect
307 U.S. 433Article Five of the United States ConstitutionChild Labor AmendmentColeman v MillerConstitution_of_the_United_StatesConvention to propose amendments to the United States ConstitutionDillon v. GlossEqual Rights AmendmentJune 1939List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Hughes CourtList of amendments to the United States ConstitutionList of landmark court decisions in the United StatesPenumbra (law)Political questionTwenty-seventh Amendment to the United States Constitution
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Coleman v. Miller
Coleman v. Miller, 307 U.S. 433 (1939), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court which clarified that if the Congress of the United States—when proposing for ratification an amendment to the United States Constitution, pursuant to Article V thereof—chooses not to set a deadline by which the state legislatures of three-fourths of the states or, if prescribed by Congress State ratifying conventions in three-fourths of the states, must act upon the proposed amendment, then the proposed amendment remains pending business before the state legislatures (or ratifying conventions). The case centered on the Child Labor Amendment, which was proposed for ratification by Congress in 1924.
has abstract
Coleman v. Miller, 307 U.S. 43 ...... proposing them to the states.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
964,372,790
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Coleman v. Miller,
@en
Concurrence
Black
@en
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Butler
@en
fullname
Coleman, et al. v. Miller, Secretary of the Senate of State of Kansas, et al.
@en
Holding
A proposed amendment to the Fe ...... ent has been validly ratified.
@en
JoinConcurrence
Roberts, Frankfurter, Douglas
@en
JoinDissent
McReynolds
@en
JoinMajority
Stone, Roberts, Black, Reed, Frankfurter, Douglas
@en
justia
Litigants
Coleman v. Miller
@en
majority
Hughes
@en
Opinion
Frankfurter
@en
Overturned previous case
Dillon v. Gloss
@en
ParallelCitations
Prior
Cert. to the Supreme Court of Kansas
@en
ReargueDateA
ReargueDateB
ReargueYear
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Coleman v. Miller, 307 U.S. 43 ...... ification by Congress in 1924.
@en
label
Coleman v. Miller
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Coleman, et al. v. Miller, Secretary of the Senate of State of Kansas, et al.
@en