Political question
In United States constitutional law, the political question doctrine holds that a constitutional dispute that requires knowledge of a non-legal character or the use of techniques not suitable for a court or explicitly assigned by the Constitution to the U.S. Congress, or the President of the United States, lies within the political, rather than the legal, realm to solve, and judges customarily refuse to address such matters. The idea of a political question is closely linked to the concept of justiciability, as it comes down to a question of whether or not the court system is an appropriate forum in which to hear the case. This is because the court system only has authority to hear and decide a legal question, not a political question. Legal questions are deemed to be justiciable, while po
Wikipage redirect
2010 United States redistricting cycle2011 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Roberts2011 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Samuel Alito2011 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Sonia Sotomayor2011 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer2014 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Stephen Breyer2018 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Elena Kagan2018 term United States Supreme Court opinions of John Roberts2020 United States redistricting cycleAboriginal title in the United StatesAlperin v. Vatican BankAmerican Electric Power Co. v. ConnecticutAnwar_al-AwlakiArchibald CoxArticle Four of the United States ConstitutionArticle One of the United States ConstitutionAshwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityAustralian administrative lawBaker v. CarrBancoult v. McNamaraBarry_GoldwaterBenisek v. LamoneBruce AckermanBush v. GoreCanadian Charter of Rights and FreedomsCanadian constitutional lawChagossiansCivil disobedienceColeman v. MillerConstitution of JapanContempt of CongressConvention to propose amendments to the United States ConstitutionCounty of Oneida v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York StateDaobin DuDoe v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Dorr RebellionEarl_WarrenEllen Segal HuvelleEqual Rights Amendment
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
keywords
primaryTopic
Political question
In United States constitutional law, the political question doctrine holds that a constitutional dispute that requires knowledge of a non-legal character or the use of techniques not suitable for a court or explicitly assigned by the Constitution to the U.S. Congress, or the President of the United States, lies within the political, rather than the legal, realm to solve, and judges customarily refuse to address such matters. The idea of a political question is closely linked to the concept of justiciability, as it comes down to a question of whether or not the court system is an appropriate forum in which to hear the case. This is because the court system only has authority to hear and decide a legal question, not a political question. Legal questions are deemed to be justiciable, while po
has abstract
In United States constitutiona ...... engage in political disputes.
@en
政治问题原则(英語:Political question d ...... 可能判定该事项需要通过民主程序决定,而非由法院参与政治纠纷。
@zh
統治行為論(とうちこういろん)とは、「国家統治の基本に関する ...... 日本では「統治行為」という名称に、フランスの影響が見られる。
@ja
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,016,987,547
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
hypernym
comment
In United States constitutiona ...... ed to be justiciable, while po
@en
政治问题原则(英語:Political question d ...... 可能判定该事项需要通过民主程序决定,而非由法院参与政治纠纷。
@zh
統治行為論(とうちこういろん)とは、「国家統治の基本に関する ...... 日本では「統治行為」という名称に、フランスの影響が見られる。
@ja
label
Political question
@en
政治问题原则
@zh
統治行為論
@ja
통치행위
@ko