Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States
Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States, 323 U.S. 386 (1945), was a patent-antitrust case that the Government brought against a cartel in the glass container industry. The cartel, among other things, divided the fields of manufacture of glass containers, first, into blown glass (allocated to Corning Glass Works) and pressed glass, which was subdivided into: products made under the suction process (allocated to Owens-Illinois Glass Co.), milk bottles (allocated to Thatcher Mfg. Co.), and fruit jars (allocated to Ball Bros. plus a fixed production quota for Owens-Illinois, and Hazel-Atlas Co.). The trial court found the cartel violative of the antitrust laws and the Supreme Court agreed that the market division and related conduct were illegal. The trial court required royalty-free licensing of
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States
Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States, 323 U.S. 386 (1945), was a patent-antitrust case that the Government brought against a cartel in the glass container industry. The cartel, among other things, divided the fields of manufacture of glass containers, first, into blown glass (allocated to Corning Glass Works) and pressed glass, which was subdivided into: products made under the suction process (allocated to Owens-Illinois Glass Co.), milk bottles (allocated to Thatcher Mfg. Co.), and fruit jars (allocated to Ball Bros. plus a fixed production quota for Owens-Illinois, and Hazel-Atlas Co.). The trial court found the cartel violative of the antitrust laws and the Supreme Court agreed that the market division and related conduct were illegal. The trial court required royalty-free licensing of
has abstract
Hartford-Empire Co. v. United ...... alty licensing of the patents.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
52,301,150
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,010,974,645
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDateA
ArgueDateB
ArgueYear
case
Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States,
@en
Concurrence/Dissent
Black
@en
Rutledge
@en
courtlistener
DecideDate
DecideYear
fullname
Hartford-Empire Company v. United States
@en
googlescholar
JoinConcurrence/Dissent
Black
@en
JoinMajority
Stone, Reed, Frankfurter
@en
justia
Litigants
Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States
@en
majority
Roberts
@en
NotParticipating
Douglas, Murphy, and Jackson
@en
ParallelCitations
ReargueDateA
ReargueDateB
ReargueYear
Subsequent
Petition for clarification granted, .
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Hartford-Empire Co. v. United ...... ired royalty-free licensing of
@en
label
Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States
@en
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Hartford-Empire Company v. United States
@en