Kingsland v. Dorsey
Kingsland v. Dorsey, 338 U.S. 318 (1949), like Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., is another patent fraud decision of the United States Supreme Court growing out of the antitrust cartel case described in Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States. Kingsland is widely quoted for its statement that the prosecution of patent applications in the Patent Office "requires the highest degree of candor and good faith" because the Patent Office "must rely upon [patent attorneys'] integrity and deal with them in a spirit of trust and confidence.
Wikipage redirect
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Kingsland v. Dorsey
Kingsland v. Dorsey, 338 U.S. 318 (1949), like Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., is another patent fraud decision of the United States Supreme Court growing out of the antitrust cartel case described in Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States. Kingsland is widely quoted for its statement that the prosecution of patent applications in the Patent Office "requires the highest degree of candor and good faith" because the Patent Office "must rely upon [patent attorneys'] integrity and deal with them in a spirit of trust and confidence.
has abstract
Kingsland v. Dorsey, 338 U.S. ...... pirit of trust and confidence.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
52,448,570
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
976,948,364
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDateA
ArgueDateB
ArgueYear
case
Kingsland v. Dorsey,
@en
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Jackson
@en
fullname
Kingsland v. Dorsey
@en
JoinDissent
Frankfurter
@en
justia
Litigants
Kingsland v. Dorsey
@en
NotParticipating
Douglas
@en
ParallelCitations
PerCuriam
yes
@en
Prior
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Kingsland v. Dorsey, 338 U.S. ...... pirit of trust and confidence.
@en
label
Kingsland v. Dorsey
@en
sameAs
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Kingsland v. Dorsey
@en