Katz v. United States
Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court redefined what constitutes a "search" or "seizure" with regard to the protections of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The decision expanded the Fourth Amendment's protections from the right of search and seizures of an individual's "persons, houses, papers, and effects", as specified in the U.S. Constitution, to include as a constitutionally protected area "what [a person] seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public".
389 U.S. 347Beatrice RosenbergBerger v. New YorkBoyd v. United StatesCalifornia Bankers Assn. v. ShultzCalifornia v. CiraoloCalifornia v. GreenwoodCarpenter v. United StatesCity of Ontario v. QuonConcurring opinionDecember 1967EavesdroppingElectronic Communications Privacy ActExpectation of privacyFlorida v. HarrisFlorida v. JardinesFlorida v. RileyForeign Intelligence Surveillance ActFourth Amendment to the United States ConstitutionGeolocation Privacy and Surveillance ActHancock (programming language)Hester v. United StatesHistory of the Patriot ActHudson v. PalmerHugo_BlackIndex of consent to search case law articlesIntelligence-led policingJohn Marshall Harlan IIJohnson v. United States (1948 Fourth Amendment case)Katz V. United StatesKatz testKatz v. U.S.Katz v. usaKatz v USKatz v United StatesLandmark Cases: Historic Supreme Court DecisionsList of United States Supreme Court cases by the Warren CourtList of criminal competenciesList of landmark court decisions in the United States
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Katz v. United States
Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court redefined what constitutes a "search" or "seizure" with regard to the protections of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The decision expanded the Fourth Amendment's protections from the right of search and seizures of an individual's "persons, houses, papers, and effects", as specified in the U.S. Constitution, to include as a constitutionally protected area "what [a person] seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public".
has abstract
Katz v. United States, 389 U.S ...... about cultural privacy norms.
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
1,010,745,329
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
ArgueDate
ArgueYear
case
Katz v. United States,
@en
Concurrence
Douglas
@en
Harlan
@en
White
@en
cornell
DecideDate
DecideYear
Dissent
Black
@en
findlaw
fullname
Charles Katz v. United States
@en
googlescholar
Holding
The Fourth Amendment's protect ...... nable expectation of privacy."
@en
JoinConcurrence
Brennan
@en
JoinMajority
Warren, Douglas, Harlan, Brennan, White, Fortas
@en
justia
Litigants
Katz v. United States
@en
majority
Stewart
@en
NotParticipating
Marshall
@en
Overturned previous case
Olmstead v. United States
@en
oyez
ParallelCitations
Prior
source
.
@en
Katz, 389 U.S. at 352 .
@en
Katz, 389 U.S. at 353.
@en
Katz, 398 U.S. at 361 .
@en
text
According to the Supreme Court ...... cy" remains remarkably opaque.
@en
Among scholars, this state of ...... privacy" cases are a failure.
@en
My understanding of the rule t ...... stances would be unreasonable.
@en
The petitioner [Katz] has stre ...... be constitutionally protected.
@en
We conclude that the underpinn ...... aning of the Fourth Amendment.
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
comment
Katz v. United States, 389 U.S ...... rea accessible to the public".
@en
label
Katz v. United States
@en
wasDerivedFrom
isPrimaryTopicOf
name
@en
Charles Katz v. United States
@en