R v S (RD)
R v S (RD), [1997] 3 SCR 484 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on establishing the rules for determining reasonable apprehension of bias in the court system by judges, and establishing limits to the application of social context in judging. The case was argued by Burnley "Rocky" Jones of Halifax, Nova Scotia.
Wikipage redirect
primaryTopic
R v S (RD)
R v S (RD), [1997] 3 SCR 484 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on establishing the rules for determining reasonable apprehension of bias in the court system by judges, and establishing limits to the application of social context in judging. The case was argued by Burnley "Rocky" Jones of Halifax, Nova Scotia.
has abstract
R v S (RD), [1997] 3 SCR 484 i ...... Jones of Halifax, Nova Scotia.
@en
R. c. S. (R.D.) est une décisi ...... version de l'agent de police.
@fr
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
956,336,831
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
case-name
R v S
@en
citations
[1997] 3 SCR 484
@en
Concurrence
Gonthier J
@en
L'Heureux-Dubé and McLachlin JJ
@en
decided-date
1997-09-26
Dissent
Major J
@en
Docket
full-case-name
RDS v Her Majesty The Queen
@en
heard-date
1997-03-10
history
Judgment for the Crown in the Court of Appeal for Nova Scotia.
@en
JoinConcurrence
La Forest J
@en
JoinDissent
Lamer CJ and Sopinka J
@en
majority
Cory J, joined by Iacobucci J
@en
ruling
The appeal should be allowed.
@en
wikiPageUsesTemplate
hypernym
type
comment
R v S (RD), [1997] 3 SCR 484 i ...... Jones of Halifax, Nova Scotia.
@en
R. c. S. (R.D.) est une décisi ...... version de l'agent de police.
@fr
label
R v S (RD)
@en
R. c. S. (R.D.)
@fr