Reasonable apprehension of bias
In Canadian law, a reasonable apprehension of bias is a legal standard for disqualifying judges and administrative decision-makers for bias. Bias of the decision-maker can be real or merely perceived. The test was first stated in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. Canada (National Energy Board), [1978] 1 S.C.R. 369: — p. 394 It was further developed in: Further: "16. .... But there is one phrase in one sentence in the test that I think is wrong. I will underline the words I think are wrong in the sentence that contains them: Contrary evidence is addressed as follows:
Wikipage redirect
Apprehended biasArsenault-Cameron v Prince Edward IslandCanadian Union of Public Employees v Ontario (Minister of Labour)Corrine SparksEbner v Official Trustee in BankruptcyKate McMillanMargaret McMurdoNewfoundland Telephone Co v Newfoundland (Board of Commissioners of Public Utilities)R v S (RD)Sponsorship scandalTim Carmody
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
primaryTopic
Reasonable apprehension of bias
In Canadian law, a reasonable apprehension of bias is a legal standard for disqualifying judges and administrative decision-makers for bias. Bias of the decision-maker can be real or merely perceived. The test was first stated in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. Canada (National Energy Board), [1978] 1 S.C.R. 369: — p. 394 It was further developed in: Further: "16. .... But there is one phrase in one sentence in the test that I think is wrong. I will underline the words I think are wrong in the sentence that contains them: Contrary evidence is addressed as follows:
has abstract
In Canadian law, a reasonable ...... miles, is not to the purpose."
@en
Link from a Wikipage to an external page
Wikipage page ID
11,047,691
page length (characters) of wiki page
Wikipage revision ID
995,736,772
Link from a Wikipage to another Wikipage
wikiPageUsesTemplate
subject
hypernym
type
comment
In Canadian law, a reasonable ...... dence is addressed as follows:
@en
label
Reasonable apprehension of bias
@en