National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track

National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q28260409

about

Women 1.5 Times More Likely to Leave STEM Pipeline after Calculus Compared to Men: Lack of Mathematical Confidence a Potential Culprit.Does Gender of Administrator Matter? National Study Explores U.S. University Administrators' Attitudes About Retaining Women Professors in STEM Women are Warmer but No Less Assertive than Men: Gender and Language on Facebook Teaching accreditation exams reveal grading biases favor women in male-dominated disciplines in France.Facial appearance affects science communication Views of Japanese medical students on the work-life balance of female physicians.Leaky Pipeline Myths: In Search of Gender Effects on the Job Market and Early Career Publishing in Philosophy.Is linguistic injustice a myth? A response to Hyland (2016)Gender in Science and Engineering Faculties: Demographic Inertia Revisited Gender and the Publication Output of Graduate Students: A Case Study.Compared to men, women view professional advancement as equally attainable, but less desirable.Women have substantial advantage in STEM faculty hiring, except when competing against more-accomplished men.Is there gender bias in HIV cure research? A case study of female representation at the 2015 HIV Persistence Workshop.Who Believes in the Storybook Image of the Scientist?Scientific Eminence: Where Are the Women?Gender Diversity in a STEM Subfield - Analysis of a Large Scientific Society and Its Annual Conferences.Progress and Prospects in Gender Visibility at SMBE Annual Meetings.Gender, Productivity, and Prestige in Computer Science Faculty Hiring Networks Who Counts as Human? Antecedents to Androcentric Behavior Signaling Safety: Characterizing Fieldwork Experiences and Their Implications for Career Trajectories The Status of Women in STEM in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature 2007–2017 Recent advances in conservation and population genomics data analysis

P2860

Q30151921-89A94CEC-21A5-442D-9B43-BE913E1E13AC Q30352410-6E515538-A879-407B-AD60-8B85C52A94B0 Q30381831-58FCEA34-13B7-42EB-A962-C09E1C3776E3 Q30391146-468D531F-F9D8-4D4C-AB90-4492E13CB89C Q30855579-E1821A9F-CD84-4B22-882E-1992FA2D528B Q33760247-D02B0D42-2DBD-40C3-8673-E9F0D1E5F3EF Q33794501-4E7D14E8-2751-4CDA-A0E3-4039E8FC4F2F Q33887305-7E1FA371-D4B0-46A9-9D11-84282C881F2C Q35816239-E84B079D-500F-406F-9F14-F53C04C1241A Q35892636-5D7408F9-052F-4FBE-B945-F8B25D1DC040 Q36155135-70725884-8576-4F38-93DC-D1E09FA7A277 Q36180323-1A615B7E-F242-461C-99D2-BC7BB6BDBE8F Q37136243-A5ECCEE1-FC09-44AC-9950-F36B6BDA94C0 Q37713173-0B26846C-C23C-4717-861E-F1A93D81517F Q39144358-5B029580-2C79-4D1F-B52C-1D535B38D30E Q47627523-3A39C675-9A11-44A1-B10B-17757E994E21 Q53420314-6DF53757-8F82-4531-A553-68E1F91AD01F Q54241875-4C972F43-15A4-4AA9-894C-193931C099F4 Q56209761-6A30F5B1-B6D1-4B87-A04C-68F59BB2BA6E Q56773446-EE466491-AF70-4E26-A8EC-011B480DF6F0 Q57679136-28FEF559-FCF3-413C-9943-28FED84240A3 Q58765793-9428FC47-6913-40FB-830E-CA35DAD65EC6

P2860

National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q28260409

description

2015 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2015 թուականի Ապրիլին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2015 թվականի ապրիլին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2015年の論文

@ja

2015年論文

@yue

2015年論文

@zh-hant

2015年論文

@zh-hk

2015年論文

@zh-mo

2015年論文

@zh-tw

2015年论文

@wuu

name

National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track

@ast

National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track

@en

National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track

@nl

type

label

National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track

@ast

National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track

@en

National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track

@nl

prefLabel

National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track

@ast

National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track

@en

National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track

@nl

P1433

Q28260409-00C77E20-1233-4692-A3E2-E51800792717

P1476

Q28260409-B579256E-56D1-4FF1-BD71-54BB0F2DD16C

P2093

Q28260409-2C50A999-F693-48F0-ADB8-7021842E3B5A

P2860

Q28260409-0AE31247-DE79-42CF-A08E-93B3119120E6

Q28260409-0D306E8B-1B5B-4159-82DD-B8D1E19090C8

Q28260409-440B0A32-D4C4-4CE2-9D01-1B225ADE3AC0

Q28260409-44CD51F0-C8FE-43AE-B762-3FBF7EA481F9

Q28260409-5AEE4410-9453-452D-874B-C8F7FA638B3C

Q28260409-93B3A13D-13D6-461C-87EC-241E596A53F3

Q28260409-9F6EAD3D-6758-45BC-AFA2-81988DFD0265

Q28260409-BEB0AE24-1332-4F56-8442-602659A8CCD2

Q28260409-C581767B-2812-4718-AD02-A7F7F72103FC

Q28260409-D21F7662-B8F3-404A-8060-491B042ED97B

P304

Q28260409-4676F763-D19E-42D8-BA18-F9D91D57B18A

P31

Q28260409-F67D89AE-29E0-425E-B51E-0B524D8097FD

P3181

Q28260409-1934D894-35B8-4359-9980-315887262205

P356

Q28260409-60EF8B39-013E-45FA-B473-92C7B70A2D6C

P407

Q28260409-C4BE7C7F-EB27-4535-BFE6-E1416F7A87A8

P433

Q28260409-B0DF0767-2A60-428C-94C0-A3A308B1746D

P478

Q28260409-C25F83E7-3F3E-4F0A-9D35-F48FD4D818FE

P50

Q28260409-5DD38817-A70E-47F5-A921-031424831497

P577

Q28260409-46AF0CFB-5997-49FA-8B52-FF6159C76953

P5875

Q28260409-8A411CDA-D5C7-438F-8B9A-B2ADB8DEF47D

P698

Q28260409-D82E228E-61F5-4744-976A-6430A061071D

P921

Q28260409-9F281A67-D31E-4A45-8504-5565C48DAFB1

P932

Q28260409-B9AC7F4D-ACA5-4D52-91AD-90A938A96BF6

P3181

P356

PNAS.1418878112

P1433

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

P1476

National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track

@en

P2093

Wendy M Williams

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Nepotism and sexism in peer-review

Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape

Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students

Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?

Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women.

Understanding current causes of women's underrepresentation in science

When Scientists Choose Motherhood: A single factor goes a long way in explaining the dearth of women in math-intensive fields. How can we address it?

How stereotypes impair women's careers in science

More women in science

Survival analysis of faculty retention in science and engineering by gender.

P304

5360-5

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P3181

1377754

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P356

10.1073/PNAS.1418878112

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

P433

17

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

112

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Stephen J. Ceci

P577

2015-04-28T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

274965374

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

25870272

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

academic tenure

P932

4418903

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string