Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management
about
Comparison of central adjudication of outcomes and onsite outcome assessment on treatment effect estimatesStrategies designed to help healthcare professionals to recruit participants to research studiesExtent of non-publication in cohorts of studies approved by research ethics committees or included in trial registriesHow to make more published research trueIncreasing disparities between resource inputs and outcomes, as measured by certain health deliverables, in biomedical researchReproducibility of results in preclinical studies: a perspective from the bone fieldThe scale of the evidence base on the health effects of conventional yogurt consumption: findings of a scoping reviewSustainability of knowledge translation interventions in healthcare decision-making: a scoping review.How do scientists perceive the current publication culture? A qualitative focus group interview study among Dutch biomedical researchers.The MICHR Genomic DNA BioLibrary: An Empirical Study of the Ethics of Biorepository DevelopmentPrognostic factors for disability and sick leave in patients with subacute non-malignant pain: a systematic review of cohort studiesA manifesto for reproducible scienceExplanation and Elaboration Document for the STROBE-Vet Statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-Veterinary ExtensionCan an ethics officer role reduce delays in research ethics approval? A mixed-method evaluation of an improvement projectA European multi-language initiative to make the general population aware of independent clinical research: the European Communication on Research Awareness Need projectFeasibility of individual patient data meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgeryRaising the bar for reproducible science at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and DevelopmentAvoidable waste of research related to inadequate methods in clinical trialsOpening research sites in multicentre clinical trials within the UK: a detailed analysis of delaysImplementing systematic review techniques in chemical risk assessment: Challenges, opportunities and recommendationsOtology Jubilee: 150 years of the Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde "Where do we come from?--Where are we?--Where are we going?".Normal Neurochemistry in the Prefrontal and Cerebellar Brain of Adults with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderProjection of participant recruitment to primary care research: a qualitative study.Translating Evidence to Facilitate Shared Decision Making: Development and Usability of a Consult Decision Aid PrototypeInterventions to reduce the impact of unemployment and economic hardship on mental health in the general population: a systematic review.Can animal data translate to innovations necessary for a new era of patient-centred and individualised healthcare? Bias in preclinical animal researchWill the trilogue on the EU Data Protection Regulation recognise the importance of health research?The impact of fraudulent and irreproducible data to the translational research crisis - solutions and implementation.Comparative costs and activity from a sample of UK clinical trials units.Assessing the utility of an institutional publications officer: a pilot assessment.Clinical Research Environment in India: Challenges and Proposed SolutionsActors involved in the regulation of clinical research: comparison of Finland to England, Canada, and the USA.Making randomised trials more efficient: report of the first meeting to discuss the Trial Forge platformIs the endocrine research pipeline broken? A systematic evaluation of the Endocrine Society clinical practice guidelines and trial registration.Is medical research in danger of suffering the same fate as the NHS?Better prioritization to increase research value and decrease waste.Poorly cited articles in peer-reviewed cardiovascular journals from 1997 to 2007: analysis of 5-year citation ratesThe involvement of patient organisations in rare disease research: a mixed methods study in Australia.Heterogeneity of Human Research Ethics Committees and Research Governance Offices across Australia: An observational study.Optimizing Enrollment of Patients into Nephrology Research Studies.
P2860
Q24186056-D49D1D56-763A-498C-AD16-F83F719F6C46Q24186182-F46B885C-7FC3-47CC-A6FC-FA9C18F38BE4Q24288672-96D64ECB-5886-4B5E-B0EA-0D9B7BB537B2Q24288766-119E0035-6DD8-484A-91D1-A6CC1C939465Q24289253-A6544C01-D6AC-4450-A978-1B490086F1C0Q24289530-7BE44D4E-F0DA-4CE8-98E3-3B84F3C336BDQ26862491-CB1813D2-3BCF-4066-AD05-33038A6B2F49Q27301838-B45EFCF8-E0AE-4BEE-9ABA-E09350FF8C0DQ27319864-6EA645E6-6EE6-4ACF-A2D0-B90FB474FFB3Q27323895-3AFC0663-FAE6-4560-8C4D-E5BA16419631Q28080264-F022C327-6DA4-4BEF-A002-FE0330E98A86Q28341964-4EC31514-79C4-4EA5-9331-805CC7B434E7Q28595548-9D5476A7-2186-4EFD-8F58-6452ED78E711Q28596203-1BEC29BD-9F04-4B6E-AB9E-7B091CA2CB2BQ28602707-9125CFDB-053F-4BAC-AD57-C5D7B222A95DQ28633834-C233E52A-B7A4-496F-95C6-DF21936F50EAQ28648476-26D0AFA5-7ED8-4B35-90A3-8BDD868A0895Q28651692-A3062E99-A9FF-4ECB-8C2E-074FCE105EB2Q28655715-7E58CE03-2957-4F83-8AA9-0B81F145ED97Q28833316-BFFBA49A-6A5C-4312-81BA-C340332C200EQ30316762-E1DD1500-ACE7-44ED-B078-8738BCE371EEQ30665738-75770892-90A7-4276-A80A-BB3990410388Q30670218-63C4A235-32C5-45EA-AB77-9803AE92AF01Q30828455-D40BDDA9-90B1-44D8-8672-F7DC759E0D0BQ30848735-E13E306A-4F7D-48D2-8484-795C2D6E3A45Q30983045-D3A3A5A9-87A2-4A8E-8CB0-324A64CCCF72Q30986793-37FD3F59-3CDF-49D4-91BF-57D5679609D9Q31140087-3DFC216C-3367-4141-AA93-DEC6A95B83E4Q33629954-AEA6295F-24E1-4F56-A0B6-F502EC2780EFQ33756337-F6356FFE-4F51-4369-B7E4-F4D11D2119C0Q34913722-B810C732-933B-470D-8C8B-3910424C92CEQ35343105-787380A8-C363-4117-9F9E-3D2A5239F35AQ35653223-4CAE819C-F4A9-4A73-B7E3-6D4F83E50FDEQ35743293-B572918A-5C50-4FD2-9462-64EC67D4F885Q35779275-8310B30D-524A-4780-97FC-92A421FE07CAQ35791171-11406128-AC32-4B29-8C19-6ACF628B088CQ36028332-0CDE49AC-FAD2-4256-87C2-03D3688C29F1Q36454326-80A668D9-79FC-4CC8-92A1-5F19A2A0A76CQ36657586-E0B66FA9-CF2C-4C31-B57F-AB73B87FB2B3Q36687007-68071D14-20D8-4414-BCAC-0860E5763069
P2860
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management
description
2014 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2014 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2014 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2014年の論文
@ja
2014年論文
@yue
2014年論文
@zh-hant
2014年論文
@zh-hk
2014年論文
@zh-mo
2014年論文
@zh-tw
2014年论文
@wuu
name
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management
@ast
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management
@en
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management
@nl
type
label
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management
@ast
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management
@en
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management
@nl
prefLabel
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management
@ast
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management
@en
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management
@nl
P2093
P2860
P50
P3181
P1433
P1476
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management
@en
P2093
Elina Hemminki
Janet Wisely
Jonathan Kagan
Robert S Phillips
P2860
P304
P3181
P356
10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62297-7
P407
P577
2014-01-11T00:00:00Z