How representative are the known structures of the proteins in a complete genome? A comprehensive structural census.
about
An NMR approach to structural proteomics.Genomic analysis of membrane protein families: abundance and conserved motifsFunctional coverage of the human genome by existing structures, structural genomics targets, and homology models.Analysis of the yeast transcriptome with structural and functional categories: characterizing highly expressed proteinsPrototypes of elementary functional loops unravel evolutionary connections between protein functions.SPINE: an integrated tracking database and data mining approach for identifying feasible targets in high-throughput structural proteomics.Occurrence of protein disulfide bonds in different domains of life: a comparison of proteins from the Protein Data Bank.Graph theoretical insights into evolution of multidomain proteinsModeling the evolution of protein domain architectures using maximum parsimonyHinge Atlas: relating protein sequence to sites of structural flexibility.Interrogating domain-domain interactions with parsimony based approaches.Generic algorithm to predict the speed of translational elongation: implications for protein biogenesis.Cellular proteomes have broad distributions of protein stabilityAIDA: ab initio domain assembly serverComprehensive analysis of amino acid and nucleotide composition in eukaryotic genomes, comparing genes and pseudogenesEvolution of amino acid frequencies in proteins over deep time: inferred order of introduction of amino acids into the genetic code.Chemoenzymatic labeling of protein C-termini for positive selection of C-terminal peptides.The evolution of filamin-a protein domain repeat perspective.Molecular evolution from abiotic scratch.Structural characterization of the human proteome.Comparing function and structure between entire proteomes.Detection of protein fold similarity based on correlation of amino acid propertiesCorrect assignment of homology is crucial when genomics meets molecular evolution.Intrinsic disorder in transcription factors.Studying the folding of multidomain proteins.Digging for dead genes: an analysis of the characteristics of the pseudogene population in the Caenorhabditis elegans genome.PartsList: a web-based system for dynamically ranking protein folds based on disparate attributes, including whole-genome expression and interaction information.Proteomics of Mycoplasma genitalium: identification and characterization of unannotated and atypical proteins in a small model genome.Boosting protein stability with the computational design of β-sheet surfaces.Whole-genome trees based on the occurrence of folds and orthologs: implications for comparing genomes on different levels.Annotation transfer for genomics: measuring functional divergence in multi-domain proteins.Evolution of proteins and proteomes: a phylogenetics approach.A proteome view of structural, functional, and taxonomic characteristics of major protein domain clusters.Structural genomics analysis: characteristics of atypical, common, and horizontally transferred folds.Are non-functional, unfolded proteins (‘junk proteins’) common in the genome?
P2860
Q24534386-63EE5A0B-93C2-4566-9009-11BBAF220132Q24794492-88FC846F-E595-44EF-BFBF-7582DDA08ED0Q24814930-D154E468-AAF3-4218-B229-358A48860DC2Q30326247-E85737AA-87DE-4DEC-BDAA-D8E1658AFE4AQ30393396-C93A49EC-5306-4979-A0C5-92AAE4DD10BAQ30655358-D4F3D120-5200-4830-9249-512F39EF1D73Q30729945-5FF94060-76B1-42F4-B3C6-20D452222B7CQ33239001-547BF4DD-7469-435F-8980-19D10388F6A3Q33266484-6A10862F-0297-4F58-982D-2C4CA77861F9Q33285427-9A9E2C30-5F97-4981-A2DA-76E6B5830025Q33325800-B983A59C-2396-4BB3-96DD-441450404C97Q33426332-FFC088E0-1584-4A45-8539-B86AF443BFBAQ33771248-9C132479-563F-43A4-8587-44D2759549EAQ33860656-3DA5347C-3137-4CED-9EF1-2ECE9CB65339Q33891354-9809BA6D-7A64-4B8C-AD41-192BAA950BDEQ33961546-AAF5B242-B3EE-4803-8608-CEC70F220187Q33980427-0783A78B-0057-44BB-9D10-E0ECFB48A4F9Q34261024-DE7B46B3-85C5-42E0-B34B-B883480944DCQ34830984-B3F182A0-0036-45A2-A715-C799818CACCDQ35806623-DCA7F190-6E71-409A-B253-CE09D355DDA1Q36640722-989CF5DA-3E6B-4FB0-86ED-3CE3B5391E07Q36743900-1C496F1F-CF2D-4FFC-9C12-D351E3455AC7Q36750519-7112270C-4596-49B3-AF26-42ACE8AFFDFAQ36882145-3B26E686-7956-412D-9A65-055BA8CB240BQ37478995-F55A4D74-D3E7-48A2-BB93-99DED14D64E8Q38668496-133D6FF6-9727-48E8-AF16-DA3F290BD774Q38679170-21B4E6E5-8AB0-4A58-978F-15C7560CD36BQ39572472-C0BF46D4-FE0D-4662-A9FF-9B9FF35B9B42Q39724703-AC1A6C66-4F5D-49C9-907D-E32C79660A63Q40414224-C6030031-9AC7-4E0F-B604-E7983E732314Q40415523-D86F9731-6D18-4D4D-90AE-36045F9FA96BQ42047251-55FA04AE-CC78-4E55-84AF-297FF5E221ACQ46272948-90DF8BE6-365A-4CF3-9077-F90C4C02A2E7Q52938509-3B171BE1-AF3E-4966-A8B1-3FA2359E869FQ57909937-EC400C05-A59D-45C5-B31C-E3CBF9B2CB09
P2860
How representative are the known structures of the proteins in a complete genome? A comprehensive structural census.
description
1998 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1998 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
1998 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
1998年の論文
@ja
1998年論文
@yue
1998年論文
@zh-hant
1998年論文
@zh-hk
1998年論文
@zh-mo
1998年論文
@zh-tw
1998年论文
@wuu
name
How representative are the kno ...... mprehensive structural census.
@ast
How representative are the kno ...... mprehensive structural census.
@en
type
label
How representative are the kno ...... mprehensive structural census.
@ast
How representative are the kno ...... mprehensive structural census.
@en
prefLabel
How representative are the kno ...... mprehensive structural census.
@ast
How representative are the kno ...... mprehensive structural census.
@en
P1433
P1476
How representative are the kno ...... mprehensive structural census.
@en
P304
P356
10.1016/S1359-0278(98)00066-2
P577
1998-01-01T00:00:00Z