The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality
about
Content and communication: how can peer review provide helpful feedback about the writing?Reviewer index: a new proposal of rewarding the reviewerAre peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journalsPeer review in PLoS MedicineThe Internet for neurosurgeons: current resources and future challenges.Non-financial conflicts of interest in academic grant evaluation: a qualitative study of multiple stakeholders in FranceDoes mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trialPeer review of grant applications: criteria used and qualitative study of reviewer practices.Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol).Biomedical journal editing: elements of success.Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials'Scholarly peer reviewing': The art, its joys and woesThe scholarship of critical review: improving quality and relevance.The examination of peer review and publication in neurology.Reviewing scientific manuscripts.Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journalsValidity and reliability of the scientific review process in nursing journals - time for a rethink?The ethics of peer review in bioethicsPeer Review: Publication's Gold Standard.2017 in-training initiative of the Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics: the JARG Young Investigator Forum.Academic Primer Series: Key Papers About Peer Review.Editors' Perspectives on Enhancing Manuscript Quality and Editorial Decisions Through Peer Review and Reviewer Development.Being critical and constructive: a guide to peer reviewing for librarians.Training of peer reviewers: validation of a 5-point rating scaleTraining and experience of peer reviewers: is being a "good reviewer" a persistent quality?Training and experience of peer reviewers: an additional variable to consider.Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews.Finding a new generation of spies and manuscript reviewers.Should Biomedical Publishing Be “Opened Up”? Toward a Values-Based Peer-Review Process
P2860
Q24652439-A26A044A-F926-4685-B625-E8885D7019C9Q28703872-F729044E-6E97-42D5-B3FA-AEE3D8D2A724Q28730286-24D9EB7D-E009-431A-BCA9-F4E278B816AEQ28763694-6846E7A9-B7EA-4509-A3F7-11D79718141EQ30484942-1FC12F91-9839-47D5-8862-09EF98EAD9B8Q34230558-219E0DB5-D2FF-4D1D-865B-D6E3D7C2FFC6Q34396523-4F19CD7F-A2E4-47E7-A4A2-4E958EEE331EQ34430726-8387A0D4-DD8F-4C62-83F8-273A96432212Q34774886-4361E046-88DF-4692-BB39-AEDFC7E4369BQ35055920-02236E99-0231-4190-B194-2AE48226D90BQ35303719-7EA7A81F-8255-453C-AF75-83FA7E10F380Q35999726-E1F14F51-1DC4-4A05-B2B5-12E3EE60102EQ37004438-AF7C5684-7132-414E-8568-76074C09179BQ37770371-E3AC14E7-7D6F-4668-84CE-87374E7E4D91Q37909548-BAD2C286-CB90-4E4D-BAC1-1AD1F33E7596Q38036603-11E2DECF-9632-4E94-943A-A73316B43E84Q38100202-EA37CAE4-3875-441A-A16B-4801ECABA064Q38153174-525E1B5E-DAC5-4F2D-8406-58455F05EB0AQ38233570-C7C397C9-0702-4B49-98A6-FBDEDF29350EQ38779437-0EB914BD-B62C-4F6A-9075-55E2174A6EB3Q39371003-FF94EFBC-071C-45EB-A7EA-84385543BC22Q39384481-FFE0C678-06B7-4C44-98D9-065C80F7B06BQ42330683-53E56D9A-A645-4336-AF63-469B53D9CC22Q42776320-8B2B3C71-7D8D-44E4-814D-CD072C3D6DD2Q42908434-A47BDD04-78DB-47EC-AE3B-A3AD850E35B5Q42908439-E2B7E685-995C-478A-BF8F-F3EA5F722788Q49932679-942069E3-614A-4B54-8035-23150AED4961Q53099296-A166435F-B7FE-40E9-8ACC-F8729D414A4CQ57828500-AC6446E1-DA0B-40CF-859E-87B600DB501F
P2860
The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2007 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年論文
@yue
2007年論文
@zh-hant
2007年論文
@zh-hk
2007年論文
@zh-mo
2007年論文
@zh-tw
2007年论文
@wuu
name
The relationship of previous t ...... s to subsequent review quality
@ast
The relationship of previous t ...... s to subsequent review quality
@en
The relationship of previous t ...... to subsequent review quality.
@nl
type
label
The relationship of previous t ...... s to subsequent review quality
@ast
The relationship of previous t ...... s to subsequent review quality
@en
The relationship of previous t ...... to subsequent review quality.
@nl
prefLabel
The relationship of previous t ...... s to subsequent review quality
@ast
The relationship of previous t ...... s to subsequent review quality
@en
The relationship of previous t ...... to subsequent review quality.
@nl
P2860
P1433
P1476
The relationship of previous t ...... s to subsequent review quality
@en
P2093
John Tercier
P2860
P356
10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.0040040
P407
P577
2007-01-01T00:00:00Z