Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals

Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38036603
Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science CommunicationSelf-correction in biomedical publications and the scientific impactRewarding peer reviewers: maintaining the integrity of science communication.Systematic and open identification of researchers and authors: focus on open researcher and contributor IDMultidisciplinary bibliographic databasesSupporting and enhancing peer review in the BJGP.Peer-review policy and guidelines for Biochemia Medica Journal.Safeguarding the integrity of science communication by restraining 'rational cheating' in peer reviewEducating science editors: is there a comprehensive strategy?Upgrading instructions for authors of scholarly journals.Financial Incentives to Reviewers: Double-edged Sword.Selecting your editorial board: maintaining standards.Bibliographic databases: some critical points.How do I peer-review a scientific article?-a personal perspective.
P2860

Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals

Item
http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q38036603
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articol științific
@ro
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@gl
artigo científico
@pt
artigo científico
@pt-br
artikel ilmiah
@id
artikull shkencor
@sq
artículo científico
@es
name
Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals
@en
type
label
Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals
@en
prefLabel
Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals
@en
P1433
P1476
P2860
P304
P31
P356
P433
P478
P50
P577
P5875
P698
P932
P356
P1433
P1476
Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals
@en
P2860
P304
P31
P356
P433
P478
P50
P577
P5875
P698
P932