about
The ethics of innovation. Should innovative surgery be exempt from clinical trials and regulations?Quality improvement report: Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. Commentary: presenting unbiased information to patients can be difficThe Patient Deficit Model Overturned: a qualitative study of patients' perceptions of invitation to participate in a randomized controlled trial comparing selective bladder preservation against surgery in muscle invasive bladder cancer (SPARE, CRUK/IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 3: randomised controlled trials in the assessment stage and evaluations in the long term study stage.Remains of the day: biliary complications related to single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Enabling recruitment success in bariatric surgical trials: pilot phase of the By-Band-Sleeve study.
P2860
description
1999 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1999 թուականի Ապրիլին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
1999 թվականի ապրիլին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
1999年の論文
@ja
1999年論文
@yue
1999年論文
@zh-hant
1999年論文
@zh-hk
1999年論文
@zh-mo
1999年論文
@zh-tw
1999年论文
@wuu
name
Reflections on randomised controlled trials in surgery.
@ast
Reflections on randomised controlled trials in surgery.
@en
type
label
Reflections on randomised controlled trials in surgery.
@ast
Reflections on randomised controlled trials in surgery.
@en
prefLabel
Reflections on randomised controlled trials in surgery.
@ast
Reflections on randomised controlled trials in surgery.
@en
P1433
P1476
Reflections on randomised controlled trials in surgery.
@en
P2093
P407
P478
353 Suppl 1
P577
1999-04-01T00:00:00Z