IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 3: randomised controlled trials in the assessment stage and evaluations in the long term study stage.
about
Regulatory approval of new medical devices: cross sectional studyHow Well Is Quality Improvement Described in the Perioperative Care Literature? A Systematic ReviewWhat Evidence Underlies Clinical Practice in Paediatric Surgery? A Systematic Review Assessing Choice of Study DesignSelecting and measuring optimal outcomes for randomised controlled trials in surgerySafety and efficacy of hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: an observational cohort studyMinimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Integration of robotic surgery into routine practice and impacts on communication, collaboration, and decision making: a realist process evaluation protocol.The challenge of recruiting patients into a placebo-controlled surgical trialThe intellectual challenges and emotional consequences of equipoise contributed to the fragility of recruitment in six randomized controlled trials.Defining the level of evidence for technology adoption in the localized prostate cancer pathwayAppraisal of evidence base for introduction of new implants in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review of five widely used device technologiesA prospective development study investigating focal irreversible electroporation in men with localised prostate cancer: Nanoknife Electroporation Ablation Trial (NEAT)Initial assessment of safety and clinical feasibility of irreversible electroporation in the focal treatment of prostate cancerUse and risks of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse surgery in women in New York state: population based cohort studyA systematic review of the use of an expertise-based randomised controlled trial design.Worldwide trends in volume and quality of published protocols of randomized controlled trialsUse of C-Arm Cone Beam CT During Hepatic Radioembolization: Protocol Optimization for Extrahepatic Shunting and Parenchymal Enhancement.Novel ways to explore surgical interventions in randomised controlled trials: applying case study methodology in the operating theatre.IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 2: observational studies in the exploration and assessment stages.Surrogate markers of long-term outcome in primary total hip arthroplasty: A systematic reviewPlans to accelerate innovation in health systems are less than IDEAL.Poor adherence of randomised trials in surgery to CONSORT guidelines for non-pharmacological treatments (NPT): a cross-sectional study.The iBRA (implant breast reconstruction evaluation) study: protocol for a prospective multi-centre cohort study to inform the feasibility, design and conduct of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial comparing new techniques of implant-based breast rComparison of stapled haemorrhoidopexy with traditional excisional surgery for haemorrhoidal disease (eTHoS): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.Approaches to assessing the benefits and harms of medical devices for application in surgery.Meta-analysis of robot-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in children.Translating Regenerative Biomaterials Into Clinical Practice.Systematic review and critical appraisal of the impact of acellular dermal matrix use on the outcomes of implant-based breast reconstruction.Innovation in neurosurgery: less than IDEAL? A systematic review.Personalized external aortic root support: a review of the current status.Predicting surgical outcome in patients with glioblastoma multiforme using pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging: development and preliminary validation of a grading system.Increase in quality and quantity of orthopaedic studies from 2002 to 2012.Adaptation and innovation: a grounded theory study of procedural variation in the academic surgical workplace.Personalised External Aortic Root Support (PEARS) Compared with Alternatives for People with Life-Threatening Genetically Determined Aneurysms of the Aortic Root.Current practice in methodology and reporting of the sample size calculation in randomised trials of hip and knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for a systematic review[Patient safety in health service research].Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (LEOPARD-2): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Augmenting endogenous repair of soft tissues with nanofibre scaffolds.Adoption of a novel surgical innovation into clinical practice: protocol for a qualitative systematic review examining surgeon views.Robot-assisted stereotactic brain biopsy: systematic review and bibliometric analysis.
P2860
Q24658647-0C6FC169-3259-4DF5-A227-D884CBA7A33AQ26749310-C25CD38D-3D74-4444-949F-753972836A95Q26766697-C05A3D62-6F72-4A5A-A046-625B78D4D894Q26851180-96216A79-9DD0-4991-BA8F-60FDAD5059BEQ28268538-4243CA6C-2E4E-4089-9CCD-544E28635BE4Q30844620-07CD0F3E-662A-40AF-8790-64F1A5414946Q33598585-2BE50862-A0B8-42E5-9699-D5D727EC38BBQ33646471-C68CE8E8-C46D-40AA-8EF6-462292A7DE92Q33795300-CC173228-6C7A-4EB2-A4B0-02A6C7342694Q34061419-D1300D8A-AAEB-40BF-8A4F-67303952BB9DQ34157467-0281BF2F-FFAF-407B-9862-0677EF4B976EQ34306878-FD67821D-F81F-4C03-BB03-0191730D5DB5Q34490212-5C581C04-B2C6-4F49-A09E-D0D781AEA458Q35672497-ADD2E107-5E57-48C7-9C01-7C72A3CCC62AQ35746467-1B606D26-DD09-40E5-BC92-0C4D496B91CDQ36309066-63391A57-1DA5-4947-B60D-945B66E98D99Q36400286-FC36BFFE-64FE-4822-B446-11E114AC6847Q36409891-EC1CF3C3-5B20-4535-A746-6210C7709984Q36937313-C962826B-22B0-4559-BD6E-E5F08ED942BFQ37038038-BB18F446-A8E9-4E23-A36D-84BBB26D691CQ37156367-D837028A-3E58-4EF5-8F1B-F3CAF6504861Q37449179-FE3FADCB-BC01-44A5-8F95-66CEF4AAF36CQ37498478-B8B95784-FF1A-467B-A513-D6B23A1C4D8FQ37609255-CB622C71-CA13-4F32-9434-CDC7E7B63AE0Q38188436-D3CDDB41-7CD0-482F-96EE-DA77ED0197D5Q38266494-ED24D9F7-0B50-43C2-A30A-F2EE613AFCF6Q38522439-44B5E688-0FB7-4C54-A396-6F14C06E2657Q38537402-9D09F80A-9D39-4CE6-B3F9-45DBFD08DB59Q38638540-EEC1651C-B743-42EE-B878-4D5F51D22722Q38794728-45371CC6-17B2-4FD4-9322-0816ECF084E8Q39138096-4C9AC0D6-4D5A-4918-9CE2-60E30D365635Q40159936-65C3A721-CDF0-4B5D-8302-3E77EE3C8D2EQ41578232-8EAB82BF-A051-4ACC-8D6D-BCC29FF6DF41Q42343438-CE0CC8B2-5D53-401E-996B-F513840BB72BQ42374147-88C7E239-2E75-4B91-81CE-6E60B2F6B1E9Q46009309-0D40B842-BADF-4980-8938-BEC22D615A54Q47111447-36754A7A-EA7B-4AF6-8427-92258A9E791AQ52562898-4D0F84A1-308A-4F83-8646-47ABAFA19651Q52582230-1567E627-DC16-4F5A-8598-9ADB91CBD28BQ55296363-9964010B-221E-45E5-AF69-3DCA8AB3A2AF
P2860
IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 3: randomised controlled trials in the assessment stage and evaluations in the long term study stage.
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年論文
@yue
2013年論文
@zh-hant
2013年論文
@zh-hk
2013年論文
@zh-mo
2013年論文
@zh-tw
2013年论文
@wuu
2013年论文
@zh
2013年论文
@zh-cn
name
IDEAL framework for surgical i ...... in the long term study stage.
@en
type
label
IDEAL framework for surgical i ...... in the long term study stage.
@en
prefLabel
IDEAL framework for surgical i ...... in the long term study stage.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
IDEAL framework for surgical i ...... in the long term study stage.
@en
P2093
Art Sedrakyan
Danica Marinac-Dabic
David J Beard
IDEAL Group
Jane M Blazeby
Peter McCulloch
P2860
P356
10.1136/BMJ.F2820
P407
P577
2013-06-18T00:00:00Z