Total disc replacement compared to lumbar fusion: a randomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up - Wikidata - awgldk - TriplyDB

Total disc replacement compared to lumbar fusion: a randomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up

Total disc replacement compared to lumbar fusion: a randomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33971952

about

Total disc replacement for chronic back pain in the presence of disc degeneration Operative Management of Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease The activL(®) Artificial Disc: a next-generation motion-preserving implant for chronic lumbar discogenic pain Low Back Pain: Current Surgical Approaches Quality and Quantity of Published Studies Evaluating Lumbar Fusion during the Past 10 Years: A Systematic Review Generic Preference-based Measures for Low Back Pain: Which of Them Should Be Used?Concurrent Use of Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty and Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: The Lumbar Hybrid Procedure for the Treatment of Multilevel Symptomatic Degenerative Disc Disease: A Prospective Study.A systematic literature review of time to return to work and narcotic use after lumbar spinal fusion using minimal invasive and open surgery techniques.Low back pain (chronic)De novo spine surgery as a predictor of additional spine surgery at the same or distant spine regions L5-S1 disc replacement after two previous fusion surgeries for scoliosis.Analysis of adjacent segment reoperation after lumbar total disc replacement.Surgery with disc prosthesis versus rehabilitation in patients with low back pain and degenerative disc: two year follow-up of randomised study.ISASS Policy Statement - Lumbar Artificial Disc.Kineflex lumbar artificial disc versus Charité lumbar total disc replacement for the treatment of degenerative disc disease: A randomized non-inferiority trial with minimum of 2 years' follow-up.Results from a randomized controlled study between total disc replacement and fusion compared with results from a spine register.Cost effectiveness of disc prosthesis versus lumbar fusion in patients with chronic low back pain: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up.The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2011.Predictors of outcome after surgery with disc prosthesis and rehabilitation in patients with chronic low back pain and degenerative disc: 2-year follow-up Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal fusion compared with motion-preservation procedures: a meta-analysis.Reliability of MRI findings in candidates for lumbar disc prosthesis.Clinical outcomes after treatment with disc prostheses in three lumbar segments compared to one- or two segments.A New CT Method for Assessing 3D Movements in Lumbar Facet Joints and Vertebrae in Patients before and after TDR.Complications and Rates of Subsequent Lumbar Surgery Following Lumbar Total Disc Arthroplasty and Lumbar Fusion Swespine: the Swedish spine register : the 2012 report Comparison of artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Discogenic Low Back Pain: Evaluation of L4-S1 Fusion.Clinical and radiographic outcomes with L4-S1 axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) and posterior instrumentation: a multicenter study.Five-year follow-up of total disc replacement compared to fusion: a randomized controlled trial.Biomechanical effects of semi-constrained integrated artificial discs on zygapophysial joints of implanted lumbar segments.The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2009.A meta-analysis of artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease.Intervertebral disc properties: challenges for biodevices.Spine surgery outcomes in a workers' compensation cohort.Lumbar artificial intervertebral disc replacement: a systematic review.Adjacent segment degeneration and disease after lumbar fusion compared with motion-preserving procedures: a meta-analysis.Lumbar total disc arthroplasty: outdated surgery or here to stay procedure? A systematic review of current literature.Lumbar disc replacement surgery-successes and obstacles to widespread adoption.Evaluation of Aesculap Implant Systems activl Artificial Disc for the treatment of degenerative disc disease.Total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses.

P2860

Q24200767-4CB2C6BE-DF60-402B-9D02-87F93D24201D Q26738917-84684C26-2742-4C28-8B67-193B9B810A13 Q26747715-A36FFB84-7FB6-4188-806A-A040D61B68A4 Q26799235-27495D09-6A43-48DE-98E5-3AC0FC189889 Q26824344-34860B10-0BE4-4378-AF4B-E127B2D97DAB Q28085341-EDE62A33-894B-400C-86B4-3A627128B9E4 Q30491958-4D6DADCA-9E20-4A88-BB32-B50C01EBCE9E Q33846241-C1746F4E-E8B4-4550-AD9B-804616F2CF2B Q33850473-E3F02503-483E-4108-A74A-8893F1FB3C41 Q34830372-EE512490-581A-4CC2-90D3-32B29877E42E Q34862081-A4752D2A-6726-4376-B85A-7B1ACE7C5C69 Q34991876-DD4F205F-59D8-4327-AD73-CFA8F2618CF9 Q35002503-ED4D822D-BE15-4663-9CA3-9BB4FAE13DC0 Q35179473-029F1908-BBAB-4A88-81E2-A446F3023D3F Q35194305-D48D84E5-FBFC-4ED1-9D70-AC09EADCC2B8 Q35194325-005C534B-2CED-426D-A852-4476B5C06581 Q35223190-A5D37CD7-53DD-461D-9859-436043DA9D0F Q35693176-F2DBE7A3-BC6C-421D-BF67-734603BAD04D Q35888260-9DAB4E6A-BD1C-4147-AEA4-E89D5A5EF444 Q35954525-1A90145B-87D8-4EF3-89A8-ACB1B53337FF Q36055856-082E5830-3291-4BF8-BD73-4DE3388BD538 Q36175585-BF194E30-E39C-4957-8482-504750ED2E22 Q36260978-1BE06AA5-A825-47CA-81F8-F2E2419C6AC4 Q36457046-8D06D8A7-B510-4B78-9A82-3B0819870167 Q36780092-E8332FED-94B8-4836-B967-831C3964F923 Q36937794-36DFF2B9-B17F-4F14-A03A-CAEAC2D5CF6E Q37176275-6C670171-F733-4313-9529-A3C2EFE8D6E2 Q37209600-6F22916E-C009-4733-AA01-810146AD1EA3 Q37245760-F0CDCA7B-7F7C-44BB-AB12-26AB541C2358 Q37313191-33760705-5132-4EB1-9884-FB493FC90E73 Q37660188-BE9053F2-133E-4CE0-AF16-D20BEDFE0E3F Q37724032-81D43517-01A2-4051-8B79-735CBCD94D2E Q37871995-DF792322-C47B-419A-AAF3-6E43EAA8DCA2 Q38033699-FBD25BD1-6B16-4B20-B4A1-600F917660D8 Q38122713-EA69D386-0455-46FD-9D57-9AFF031398B4 Q38204288-CF75EA58-425C-4EFE-AF00-7801FF3A11C3 Q38690033-F5E4205D-CEE0-46D6-AF2B-77B690F15B3B Q38742144-7DC568CA-3F44-49AB-BF3D-DAE227FCF5D8 Q38799736-55A37C73-6919-4CA7-BDD8-EB0F367D11DE Q38905833-82126875-77C6-45B9-8B05-F5B1DE397A45

P2860

Total disc replacement compared to lumbar fusion: a randomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q33971952

description

2009 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2009 թուականի Յունիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած

@hyw

2009 թվականի հունիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված

@hy

2009年の論文

@ja

2009年論文

@yue

2009年論文

@zh-hant

2009年論文

@zh-hk

2009年論文

@zh-mo

2009年論文

@zh-tw

2009年论文

@wuu

name

Total disc replacement compare ...... ed trial with 2-year follow-up

@ast

Total disc replacement compare ...... ed trial with 2-year follow-up

@en

type

label

Total disc replacement compare ...... ed trial with 2-year follow-up

@ast

Total disc replacement compare ...... ed trial with 2-year follow-up

@en

prefLabel

Total disc replacement compare ...... ed trial with 2-year follow-up

@ast

Total disc replacement compare ...... ed trial with 2-year follow-up

@en

P1433

Q33971952-E812559E-3DA8-4D53-9754-B1F25114F38E

P1476

Q33971952-916DCFFB-7D52-429C-A4DE-1330BCFD4FEC

P2093

Q33971952-06CBA3A3-4BC8-4B8C-B848-7C606BFA13EE

Q33971952-2A5E7BB1-8626-4209-925A-DE7DC4D35EA4

Q33971952-554A8E8D-3F44-47C5-8558-286265A0247A

Q33971952-939147B8-B92E-4ABE-BC1D-79E2AFDC70A6

Q33971952-D58CEBE8-5E15-4FBA-A91E-0F1EDF44EC08

P2860

Q33971952-054F0FD9-969E-461A-B4A4-AECB0347AFC5

Q33971952-0ACA4610-A59B-469B-8C6B-976264C7ED57

Q33971952-3C2A9122-81AC-4A8A-B1E2-09C69656D3D6

Q33971952-40068281-369A-418F-87A4-C5430353C6C8

Q33971952-4EC5AD55-64A9-4272-889D-08A76F49F616

Q33971952-5FD9D03A-D93C-4790-A0DF-5E116944BA31

Q33971952-71C17BFC-C9B9-4335-819F-2529D3DA945B

Q33971952-79302B30-67CE-40EF-BE11-2D64267B451C

Q33971952-8CB51B7C-098D-4AD9-8ECA-9E67D2827651

Q33971952-9497929B-7C60-4ABD-BE26-BDDD1008FAEE

P2888

Q33971952-10345FEB-7A6B-4B50-A789-3436181199DE

P304

Q33971952-0748A30E-0C51-47DA-92A3-185FA0568491

P31

Q33971952-20796F98-C13E-4B45-BC38-3BF08C01F84A

P356

Q33971952-3C47E680-34F7-41A7-A157-E59B724B8818

P433

Q33971952-0BCB63B0-9704-4C50-9C2C-0DD43CE270EE

P478

Q33971952-D975EA25-4F86-497E-8B93-8F1B8923177E

P577

Q33971952-248B3779-4CB8-4A62-8829-5725E8BB2906

P5875

Q33971952-7B1B4805-8C64-4DB1-9642-18508789944F

P698

Q33971952-CCAC2CFF-7897-4229-93CA-955357E70ABA

P932

Q33971952-4CEC8EA0-9BD9-45B6-980F-DD2EEDC36CB7

P356

S00586-009-1047-0

P1433

European Spine Journal

P1476

Total disc replacement compare ...... ed trial with 2-year follow-up

@en

P2093

Björn Branth

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Claes Olerud

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Hans Tropp

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Svante Berg

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Tycho Tullberg

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Charité total disc replacement--clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years

Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charité III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients

2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group

Clinical results of Maverick lumbar total disc replacement: two-year prospective follow-up

Clinical results of total lumbar disc replacement with ProDisc II: three-year results for different indications

A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes

The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up

Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels

Surgery versus conservative management in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis--a prospective randomized study: part 1.

Complications in lumbar fusion surgery for chronic low back pain: comparison of three surgical techniques used in a prospective randomized study. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group

P2888

s00586-009-1047-0

P304

1512-1519

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

P356

10.1007/S00586-009-1047-0

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

10

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

18

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P577

2009-06-09T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

26276612

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

19506919

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P932

2899375

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string