Variability in PET quantitation within a multicenter consortium.
about
A review on segmentation of positron emission tomography imagesEvaluation of strategies towards harmonization of FDG PET/CT studies in multicentre trials: comparison of scanner validation phantoms and data analysis procedures.Performance Observations of Scanner Qualification of NCI-Designated Cancer Centers: Results From the Centers of Quantitative Imaging Excellence (CQIE) Program"RADIOTRANSCRIPTOMICS": A synergy of imaging and transcriptomics in clinical assessmentMulticenter trials using ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET to predict chemotherapy response: effects of differential measurement error and bias on power calculations for unselected and enrichment designs.Role of PET quantitation in the monitoring of cancer response to treatment: Review of approaches and human clinical trials.Instrumentation factors affecting variance and bias of quantifying tracer uptake with PET/CT.18F-FDG PET and MR imaging associations across a spectrum of pediatric brain tumors: a report from the pediatric brain tumor consortiumExploratory evaluation of MR permeability with 18F-FDG PET mapping in pediatric brain tumors: a report from the Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium.Design considerations for using PET as a response measure in single site and multicenter clinical trials.Superior prognostic utility of gross and metabolic tumor volume compared to standardized uptake value using PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapyNoise considerations for PET quantification using maximum and peak standardized uptake value.Early experiences in establishing a regional quantitative imaging network for PET/CT clinical trials.Variability of Image Features Computed from Conventional and Respiratory-Gated PET/CT Images of Lung Cancer.Quantitative Imaging in Cancer Clinical TrialsEvaluation of 18F-FDG PET and MRI associations in pediatric diffuse intrinsic brain stem glioma: a report from the Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium.Variance of SUVs for FDG-PET/CT is greater in clinical practice than under ideal study settingsReceiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for classification of (18)F-NaF uptake on PET/CT.Scanning linear estimation: improvements over region of interest (ROI) methods.The relative prognostic utility of standardized uptake value, gross tumor volume, and metabolic tumor volume in oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with platinum based concurrent chemoradiation with a pre-treatment [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose positJoint segmentation of anatomical and functional images: applications in quantification of lesions from PET, PET-CT, MRI-PET, and MRI-PET-CT imagesTumor quantification in clinical positron emission tomography.Biases in Multicenter Longitudinal PET Standardized Uptake Value Measurements.A Virtual Clinical Trial of FDG-PET Imaging of Breast Cancer: Effect of Variability on Response Assessment.Recommendations for measurement of tumour vascularity with positron emission tomography in early phase clinical trials.PET/MRI: Where might it replace PET/CT?Microfocus x-ray imaging of traceable pointlike 22 Na sources for quality control.Technical Note: Transconvolution based equalization of positron energy effects for the use of 68 Ge/68 Ga phantoms in determining 18 F PET recovery.Qualification of National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers for Quantitative PET/CT Imaging in Clinical Trials.Longitudinal monitoring of reconstructed activity concentration on a clinical time-of-flight PET/CT scanner.Technical Note: Rod phantom analysis for comparison of PET detector sampling and reconstruction methods.Response to Early Treatment Evaluated with 18F-FDG PET and PERCIST 1.0 Predicts Survival in Patients with Ewing Sarcoma Family of Tumors Treated with a Monoclonal Antibody to the Insulinlike Growth Factor 1 Receptor.Guidelines for quality control of PET/CT scans in a multicenter clinical studyRepeatability of SUV measurements in serial PET.EANM/EARL FDG-PET/CT accreditation - summary results from the first 200 accredited imaging systems.Correlation of 18F-FDG PET and MRI Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Metrics with Survival in Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma: A Report from the Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium.Multicenter survey of PET/CT protocol parameters that affect standardized uptake values.Validation of novel calibration scheme with traceable point-like (22)Na sources on six types of PET scanners.Multi institutional quantitative phantom study of yttrium-90 PET in PET/MRI: the MR-QUEST study.Robustness of quantitative hypoxia PET image analysis for predicting local tumor control.
P2860
Q26825470-0E16F137-E24A-4084-A57E-C3A0D03A7D1DQ30645097-62FF5F65-8C55-4AE4-A235-310F516F9E6BQ33556331-32371156-A4C7-4423-A47E-D3310046ED63Q33704494-48271D05-5500-4D31-86DD-BDFF034D2B3FQ33921056-A6B5CE9E-F990-4385-90A0-5DF87F8AA927Q34175770-B92A25E0-F218-4D27-B28B-F42E02EF62FDQ34336023-F4098488-3956-460F-85CF-B87023E316EDQ34598876-BCA49C5A-8356-42D3-B541-2F88B46AF24FQ34610598-B2836538-5511-4784-AE13-20ECA621C952Q35653277-FCEBC018-E5D5-4F5C-9DAF-310A15E3CCA6Q35789209-D8827596-9314-4504-9AD8-927B2F931B02Q36158583-FD8E4ABF-25DE-4ECC-95D9-87A48CD10421Q36303559-9808BFFA-D6C5-4C62-B36D-F2EB66CE6B6EQ36427534-04DA86E3-B8BE-47D9-B037-692F05038E79Q36477059-8C4D28C0-D904-4557-AB3D-E5E42149FA9BQ36479298-84BDBD87-1651-4D86-B42B-FDC16C276426Q36626050-CC9045D4-D8A5-4228-9790-4B1A4F697A7BQ36628451-86E8FA7C-BE74-459E-B53D-925707D6C144Q36731371-6A995B3B-FA93-42A1-80B0-E50844A8AB21Q37192658-A17CF073-295B-4D85-941F-6B235A2BFE98Q37228057-093F44CB-09F6-48B2-BD0D-37AD33AED55AQ37342658-A5CF975D-A192-4764-AF50-7D0DF30ED02AQ37721524-77B706C9-87C3-4907-BB9D-4C3C989BFC87Q37721526-6BB0C10B-3E0E-42A2-8307-4FEC9E3D0B31Q38000044-041FA3B0-A4C1-4AAB-B921-34E7B4404C75Q38735917-FB9546DD-DF78-4822-8EEF-6625ECCEEF9DQ38779258-F614D32A-981A-4270-A15C-2681E2FC0E94Q38791981-337C84FA-E48C-446C-8EF9-141FD9DBC630Q38932290-2A61D87D-C8F6-46A3-81F8-39117AD6D7EFQ39127862-88A1F97B-A00F-437E-9410-13F34F46D682Q39223318-F8FEE52E-3E3E-4268-BCCE-D93454B1B0D7Q41303066-39FC648A-E87E-47E5-B32A-B7235F0094ECQ41683890-B147C2EC-91D4-4144-AADE-8AC66616B028Q43643017-75C386FD-4814-439B-9BF2-1FA7888BA829Q47388017-8E64807E-D26A-48EE-B77E-79737BCA8694Q48237727-540C31DC-438C-42EF-B556-E39D247989CEQ49694520-FE52FB52-6AC2-4073-84FB-F1857AD70C19Q51265116-DDCB4753-D92A-4856-A2F4-FB0817AD26E0Q52608240-804D3976-052F-4449-B94B-BCA964CB5533Q52990174-BFD3D3E9-B12B-4211-AFBE-D58A59DF1C59
P2860
Variability in PET quantitation within a multicenter consortium.
description
2010 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2010 թուականի Յուլիսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2010 թվականի հուլիսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2010年の論文
@ja
2010年学术文章
@wuu
2010年学术文章
@zh-cn
2010年学术文章
@zh-hans
2010年学术文章
@zh-my
2010年学术文章
@zh-sg
2010年學術文章
@yue
name
Variability in PET quantitation within a multicenter consortium.
@ast
Variability in PET quantitation within a multicenter consortium.
@en
Variability in PET quantitation within a multicenter consortium.
@nl
type
label
Variability in PET quantitation within a multicenter consortium.
@ast
Variability in PET quantitation within a multicenter consortium.
@en
Variability in PET quantitation within a multicenter consortium.
@nl
prefLabel
Variability in PET quantitation within a multicenter consortium.
@ast
Variability in PET quantitation within a multicenter consortium.
@en
Variability in PET quantitation within a multicenter consortium.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Variability in PET quantitation within a multicenter consortium.
@en
P2093
Frederic H Fahey
Harold Thurston
Mehmet Kocak
Paul E Kinahan
Robert K Doot
Tina Young Poussaint
P2860
P304
P356
10.1118/1.3455705
P407
P577
2010-07-01T00:00:00Z