Variance of SUVs for FDG-PET/CT is greater in clinical practice than under ideal study settings
about
Quantitative imaging in cancer evolution and ecologyVolumetric FDG-PET predicts overall and progression- free survival after 14 days of targeted therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.The usefulness of standardized uptake value in differentiation between benign and malignant thyroid lesions detected incidentally in 18F-FDG PET/CT examination.Quantitative imaging biomarkers: a review of statistical methods for computer algorithm comparisons.Utility of 18F-FDG PET with a semi-quantitative index in the detection of sarcomatous transformation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1.Reproducibility of (18)F-FDG PET uptake measurements in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma on both PET/CT and PET/MRTest-Retest Variability in Lesion SUV and Lesion SUR in 18F-FDG PET: An Analysis of Data from Two Prospective Multicenter Trials.Repeatability of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Prospective Assessment in 2 Multicenter Trials.Variability of Image Features Computed from Conventional and Respiratory-Gated PET/CT Images of Lung Cancer.Multicenter Clinical Trials Using 18F-FDG PET to Measure Early Response to Oncologic Therapy: Effects of Injection-to-Acquisition Time Variability on Required Sample Size.Value of volume-based metabolic parameters for predicting survival in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Repeatability of quantitative FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT in recurrent ovarian carcinoma: test-retest measurements for tumor FDG uptake, diameter, and volume.Prognostic value of pre-treatment F-18-FDG PET-CT in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing radioembolization.Evaluation of Cross-Calibrated 68Ge/68Ga Phantoms for Assessing PET/CT Measurement Bias in Oncology Imaging for Single- and Multicenter TrialsQualification of National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers for Quantitative PET/CT Imaging in Clinical Trials.Repeatability of SUV in Oncologic 18F-FDG PET.Longitudinal monitoring of reconstructed activity concentration on a clinical time-of-flight PET/CT scanner.Sensitivity of Image Features to Noise in Conventional and Respiratory-Gated PET/CT Images of Lung Cancer: Uncorrelated Noise Effects.Variation and repeatability of measured standardized uptake values depending on actual values: a phantom study.Quantitation of Cancer Treatment Response by 18F-FDG PET/CT: Multicenter Assessment of Measurement Variability.Multicenter survey of PET/CT protocol parameters that affect standardized uptake values.Repeatability of quantitative 18F-FLT uptake measurements in solid tumors: an individual patient data multi-center meta-analysis.Prognostic evaluation of percentage variation of metabolic tumor burden calculated by dual-phase (18) FDG PET-CT imaging in patients with head and neck cancer.An account of data entry inconsistencies and their impact on positron emission tomography quantification
P2860
Q27016021-E110F16B-9E40-41CD-8BFD-DFD63E39808EQ33780956-D2B3844A-C4E3-47BE-BFA4-CACF6B2E33DFQ34309266-D694F268-6383-475A-B7CF-ACB58664AE41Q34681714-CF0303FB-8C84-4208-A901-B1788A0FE267Q35091332-87B1CDA4-0A3C-42C1-9BBF-C393B163679BQ36295389-34905D65-7994-4730-94BC-D04AA47C32A8Q36363737-703E2159-E667-4248-BE4D-D434F8A28259Q36425061-A0C3D0A2-8DA2-4BA5-87FC-971EBD9D0BD7Q36427534-BDF1DB05-9B5D-49F1-9E6E-3D13046BB567Q36567875-5567D74C-CE3C-4904-81F3-74B8214BAFDFQ37354718-A5C8A7EB-0198-452D-8AFA-CC9FE35E47AFQ37495153-5A17C3F7-F160-4E47-8F71-3C35BE940475Q37522674-4EADECE4-E78D-47FB-81A7-2F0FB7D8A1ADQ37558197-096B17AA-8F21-4398-875D-88E4F006B94DQ38932290-B6609E9C-697B-4901-AAC4-97C4CCA3890BQ38945159-36B7B7CF-0FE8-4514-B267-98BDF0437BDCQ39127862-17492989-8BF2-456D-8038-0B02C8331CE1Q45938612-216B649D-197C-40CC-A443-208AB02CFE4DQ47142206-891B7BBE-4699-4D24-9265-5B2B5D83E13FQ48673112-E7D5D409-BB86-4169-B0B6-389401BF44E0Q49694520-DD46EE9B-8529-47FC-A3ED-03CDC8C1CA57Q49836052-923BAFCB-7A31-475C-8537-0A178F721839Q53020730-56160E3E-7836-4212-96B4-AFCCD5BCF791Q58739579-F096F763-7AFF-469E-8613-496C3395FAE2
P2860
Variance of SUVs for FDG-PET/CT is greater in clinical practice than under ideal study settings
description
2013 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2013年の論文
@ja
2013年論文
@yue
2013年論文
@zh-hant
2013年論文
@zh-hk
2013年論文
@zh-mo
2013年論文
@zh-tw
2013年论文
@wuu
2013年论文
@zh
2013年论文
@zh-cn
name
Variance of SUVs for FDG-PET/C ...... han under ideal study settings
@ast
Variance of SUVs for FDG-PET/C ...... han under ideal study settings
@en
type
label
Variance of SUVs for FDG-PET/C ...... han under ideal study settings
@ast
Variance of SUVs for FDG-PET/C ...... han under ideal study settings
@en
prefLabel
Variance of SUVs for FDG-PET/C ...... han under ideal study settings
@ast
Variance of SUVs for FDG-PET/C ...... han under ideal study settings
@en
P2093
P2860
P1476
Variance of SUVs for FDG-PET/C ...... han under ideal study settings
@en
P2093
Alberto A Chiappori
Claudia G Berman
Edward A Eikman
Jongphil Kim
Kavindra Nath
Robert A Gatenby
Tawee Tanvetyanon
P2860
P304
P356
10.1097/RLU.0B013E318279FFDF
P577
2013-03-01T00:00:00Z