Evaluation of LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation.
about
Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrestMechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrestMechanical chest compressions versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrestPart 7: CPR techniques and devices: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular CareCardiopulmonary resuscitation using electrically driven devices: a reviewManual versus mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. An experimental study in pigs.Improved chest recoil using an adhesive glove device for active compression-decompression CPR in a pediatric manikin modelPassive leg raise (PLR) during cardiopulmonary (CPR) - a method article on a randomised study of survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA)Evaluation of coronary blood flow velocity during cardiac arrest with circulation maintained through mechanical chest compressions in a porcine model.Prehospital randomised assessment of a mechanical compression device in cardiac arrest (PaRAMeDIC) trial protocolFeasibility of intra-arrest hypothermia induction: A novel nasopharyngeal approach achieves preferential brain coolingMechanical versus manual chest compressions for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsThe study protocol for the LINC (LUCAS in cardiac arrest) study: a study comparing conventional adult out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a concept with mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation.Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Pattern Evaluation Based on Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition Filter via Nonlinear Approaches.Out-of-hospital therapeutic hypothermia in cardiac arrest victims.Mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients with cardiac arrestChest Compression Fraction between Mechanical Compressions on a Reducible Stretcher and Manual Compressions on a Standard Stretcher during Transport in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrests: The Ambulance Stretcher Innovation of Asian Cardiopulmonary ResuThe Efficacy of LUCAS in Prehospital Cardiac Arrest Scenarios: A Crossover Mannequin Study.Traumatic injuries after mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (LUCAS2): a forensic autopsy study.Prompt use of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the MECCA study report.Thoracic Spine Fracture in a Survivor of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest with Mechanical CPR.Submersion, accidental hypothermia and cardiac arrest, mechanical chest compressions as a bridge to final treatment: a case report.Single rescuer exertion using a mechanical resuscitation device: a randomized controlled simulation study.[Comments on the 2010 guidelines on cardiopulmonary resuscitation of the European Resuscitation Council].Complications of mechanical chest compression devices.Reduction of CPR artifacts in the ventricular fibrillation ECG by coherent line removal.Neurologically intact survival in a porcine model of cardiac arrest: manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation vs. LifeBelt cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Catheterization laboratory activation during mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation: when should we say "No?".Transport with ongoing resuscitation: a comparison between manual and mechanical compression.Swedish ambulance nurses' experiences of nursing patients suffering cardiac arrest.Closed-loop controller for chest compressions based on coronary perfusion pressure: a computer simulation study.Corpuls CPR Generates Higher Mean Arterial Pressure Than LUCAS II in a Pig Model of Cardiac Arrest.Corpuls cpr resuscitation device generates superior emulated flows and pressures than LUCAS II in a mechanical thorax model.Mechanical chest compression with a medical parallel manipulator for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.Estimation of the variations in mechanical impedance between the actuator and the chest, and the power delivered to the chest during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using machine-embedded sensors.Mechanical versus manual chest compression CPR under ground ambulance transport conditions
P2860
Q24200216-41355D7C-6AB5-4971-BC2A-DBC2D00E89CBQ24234756-7EA87BBB-EB14-48F1-AA34-E18F2D82D8AFQ24242828-6DE96CCD-CF41-4F7E-A8AC-BB52C516FAD7Q24631819-45F9AA27-BCC7-4477-9EC3-16FA21622E31Q26775694-638D5170-60BC-4DFE-AE96-B3C22E7E3CBBQ33732090-BBBB134C-27AD-4481-81F0-CB08D89261FAQ33772666-721B777C-FE00-4E27-9E80-CC2459FCC675Q33896618-DB5D6382-177E-48BA-9716-5C0E126DE89AQ34105751-A4827CF1-527E-41BC-8EA8-FF9DC7D330E7Q34360475-92D5674A-B0C0-49CC-B747-E9F32FBE5909Q36047563-A0E8DB53-212C-40CF-99F0-0C21AA8BBD23Q36209539-435814BD-8F1A-4371-91E6-34CCAD8BA93CQ36618058-201DD367-7871-4B98-BE10-72E5E84CB1E0Q37159508-CA97A68A-4AC8-4E09-BED9-F70F68E25D9CQ37613099-876D7DAE-CAD3-4998-BF78-3220CA661DEDQ38248598-C6BC61D9-807E-491F-A692-1FEC46FD03B0Q38807266-3D6BC89C-1BE2-45FF-B1A0-5E8405A10BC9Q38823977-8986457D-6EC8-485F-8D51-FCC20E4DA594Q41072293-FF890865-A7E9-459C-93CF-FAFACA51A880Q41098657-CA479EE1-D1D4-4B00-BC4B-F995D3D93967Q41941487-F17E18E3-B3ED-4F6E-B968-6014C6DEBDF7Q41964704-AB9EAEDD-4EB5-486A-8B68-8BE67C61B4B6Q41972786-4E8054C3-F9FC-4F10-9230-D5BF47D21A36Q42787676-23D729B0-141C-467D-B07B-FD2D0B7EF8A4Q42872510-6BB11725-EE16-4A56-95EB-D8BC6EB5CB9AQ42919069-0550A03E-11D9-4C15-9EBB-8893699E3D31Q43101373-22C11C45-6B53-442D-8C67-7743C8781603Q43503639-94F1F0CE-0BAE-4F0D-9CD4-BE43BB214E11Q44598432-5F2F74DF-9FFC-473A-BD3C-049E4E21624AQ46125807-656E5716-300D-4A55-B7B6-E4231186D1B2Q48018182-C1C76056-93A9-478E-9884-9B7E4E125C49Q48119470-41DEF1D6-50B7-47F3-A0D7-E720A08CA85BQ50979457-FA419789-3375-4E4F-88CA-4C11D6B62C12Q53415304-F47C8CC1-CE4D-4C7B-A88D-9C754A27ECDBQ55380500-DF2EDE4C-C187-4F89-9FE6-AAE0643D8C4AQ58088642-4990C96D-95C8-4B59-A9EF-FC056AF17C84
P2860
Evaluation of LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation.
description
2002 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2002 թուականի Դեկտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2002 թվականի դեկտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2002年の論文
@ja
2002年論文
@yue
2002年論文
@zh-hant
2002年論文
@zh-hk
2002年論文
@zh-mo
2002年論文
@zh-tw
2002年论文
@wuu
name
Evaluation of LUCAS, a new dev ...... e decompression resuscitation.
@ast
Evaluation of LUCAS, a new dev ...... e decompression resuscitation.
@en
Evaluation of LUCAS, a new dev ...... e decompression resuscitation.
@nl
type
label
Evaluation of LUCAS, a new dev ...... e decompression resuscitation.
@ast
Evaluation of LUCAS, a new dev ...... e decompression resuscitation.
@en
Evaluation of LUCAS, a new dev ...... e decompression resuscitation.
@nl
prefLabel
Evaluation of LUCAS, a new dev ...... e decompression resuscitation.
@ast
Evaluation of LUCAS, a new dev ...... e decompression resuscitation.
@en
Evaluation of LUCAS, a new dev ...... e decompression resuscitation.
@nl
P2093
P1433
P1476
Evaluation of LUCAS, a new dev ...... e decompression resuscitation.
@en
P2093
Audrius Paskevicius
Leif Pierre
Qiuming Liao
Stig Steen
Trygve Sjöberg
P304
P356
10.1016/S0300-9572(02)00271-X
P577
2002-12-01T00:00:00Z