Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

about

Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q36209539

description

2015 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2015年の論文

@ja

2015年論文

@yue

2015年論文

@zh-hant

2015年論文

@zh-hk

2015年論文

@zh-mo

2015年論文

@zh-tw

2015年论文

@wuu

2015年论文

@zh

2015年论文

@zh-cn

name

Mechanical versus manual chest ...... f randomized controlled trials

@ast

Mechanical versus manual chest ...... f randomized controlled trials

@en

type

Item

label

Mechanical versus manual chest ...... f randomized controlled trials

@ast

Mechanical versus manual chest ...... f randomized controlled trials

@en

prefLabel

Mechanical versus manual chest ...... f randomized controlled trials

@ast

Mechanical versus manual chest ...... f randomized controlled trials

@en

P1476

Mechanical versus manual chest ...... f randomized controlled trials

@en

P2093

Fei Wang

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Lu Tang

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P2860

Mechanical versus manual chest compressions for cardiac arrest

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration

GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

Increased cortical cerebral blood flow with LUCAS; a new device for mechanical chest compressions compared to standard external compressions during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Manual chest compression vs use of an automated chest compression device during resuscitation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized trial.

Evaluation of LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation.

Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage.

The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements.

Manual vs. integrated automatic load-distributing band CPR with equal survival after out of hospital cardiac arrest. The randomized CIRC trial.

Mechanical versus manual chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (PARAMEDIC): a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial.

P2888

srep15635

P304

15635

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

meta-analysis

P356

10.1038/SREP15635

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P407

English

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P50

Wan-Jie Gu

P577

2015-10-27T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P5875

283562685

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P6179

1028156501

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P698

26503429

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

cardiac arrest

P932

4621518

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string