Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy.
about
Lumbar spinal stenosisEconomic impact of minimally invasive lumbar surgeryDegenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in older people: current treatment optionsArguments for the choice of surgical treatments in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis - a systematic appraisal of randomized controlled trialsRisk Factors for Reoperation in Patients Treated Surgically for Lumbar Stenosis: A Subanalysis of the 8-year Data From the SPORT TrialThe Felix-trial. Double-blind randomization of interspinous implant or bony decompression for treatment of spinal stenosis related intermittent neurogenic claudication.Health-related quality of life following decompression compared to decompression and fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a Canadian multicentre study.The effectiveness of land based exercise compared to decompressive surgery in the management of lumbar spinal-canal stenosis: a systematic review.Presence of residual material following mini-hemilaminectomy in dogs with thoracolumbar intervertebral disc extrusion.Minimally invasive spine surgery: systematic review.Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.Postoperative expansion of dural sac cross-sectional area after unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression: correlation with clinical symptoms.Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study.Trumpet laminectomy microdecompression for lumbal canal stenosis.Intraoperative three-dimensional imaging in selective decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: a useful tool in theory but also in everyday practice?Minimally invasive treatment of moderate lumbar spinal stenosis with the superion interspinous spacer.Effectiveness of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysisClinical outcomes of microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.Surgical results after unilateral laminectomy for the removal of spinal cord tumorsRadiological analysis of symptomatic complications after bilateral laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.The analysis of segmental mobility with different lumbar radiographs in symptomatic patients with a spondylolisthesis.Outcomes after minimally invasive lumbar decompression: a biomechanical comparison of unilateral and bilateral laminotomiesPredictors of surgical, general and follow-up complications in lumbar spinal stenosis relative to patient age as emerged from the Spine Tango RegistryDural lesions in decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: incidence, risk factors and effect on outcomeCost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: Conservative care, laminectomy, and the Superion interspinous spacer.The Association between the Cross-Sectional Area of the Dural Sac and Low Back Pain in a Large Population: The Wakayama Spine StudyMidterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-year prospective study.The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal 2012.Outcome after Surgery of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Comparison of Bilateral Laminotomy, Trumpet Laminectomy, and Conventional LaminectomyLaminarthrectomy as a surgical approach for decompressing the spinal canal: assessment of preoperative versus postoperative dural sac cross-sectional areal (DSCSA).Time spent per patient in lumbar spinal stenosis surgeryClinical and Radiological Comparison between Ipsilateral and Contralateral Side Canal Decompression Using an Unilateral Laminotomy Approach.Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A multicenter observational study.Minimum 3-year outcomes in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis after bilateral microdecompression by unilateral or bilateral laminotomy.The contribution of RCTs to quality management and their feasibility in practice.Improvement in low back pain following spinal decompression: observational study of 119 patients.Interspinous process device versus standard conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: randomized controlled trial.Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: current strategies in diagnosis and treatment.Comparative effectiveness of microdecompression and laminectomy for central lumbar spinal stenosis: study protocol for an observational studyEffectiveness of interspinous implant surgery in patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
P2860
Q24622774-32730AA2-B946-4410-B71F-17A09941A790Q26824183-8FCEEA2F-9011-4747-A612-3BDE8C97C397Q26864481-A56755D8-949E-435A-B33D-E77A43BC36E3Q27022484-ECD8786B-CEBA-4BEC-B458-69497AA9501EQ31031576-15A66F1E-0662-4057-8D69-36C9EEC7BF86Q33589314-5E22814F-5EF7-486E-8742-5DF64C7BF8EFQ33990188-51D6F8C8-94B8-4F14-843E-7A1B46D0AE8AQ34173973-82F67FBC-A125-401C-8FE4-500B45EA31CCQ34296625-56C8BDCE-F701-4BA9-B963-5CEFD184BB74Q34437409-950D20A1-11D3-4708-9D3E-48C97648A84FQ34485527-FEFBB31D-2F33-4B63-9F57-B2733EA09ACCQ35001013-F8934A4F-E80D-42F9-88DE-4B8F4B86FA9FQ35238572-FCE51C81-3E9B-4412-9B8F-779E5EF59718Q35367286-27E852FF-B1C8-43B7-9DDF-A4BDB49622A8Q35368859-E26B224A-D24C-4B94-B358-6D258FF7280FQ35444249-F4C05823-88C2-4DA0-97DA-DB4D24A2EBC3Q35590183-145F8F9D-1860-4986-A900-C274F8E15A92Q35602074-9E954A5E-5C9A-424E-94D3-A92D7CA56A9EQ35604523-E90FA542-D855-43D8-9FA3-C7C0E2E10AF3Q35608337-9178DB18-88B0-4853-9940-2B31EBC50A65Q35693206-7C8AE4EE-9ED0-4DF1-9983-D4FAA27A2C5CQ35749252-8D7FD3BC-060B-4457-A79F-3096B363861AQ35812653-C7209617-3562-4A40-8BCE-409BCE90DA90Q35916311-C30F10DC-BCB6-48BD-BFE2-A6BC349FBD8FQ35927006-E81C4778-B5AE-4397-A39E-41273345987BQ36093747-0B512016-270B-47E1-8C30-ACA7794069EFQ36274756-D1B06463-2526-4D7B-8CB4-7F64FFC5B396Q36564287-40B62B3D-76E7-4991-8464-5B4DEBDF5174Q36778022-724E839A-E6CF-4DCB-B432-4BB87E73BF70Q37064405-E00630C6-A4D8-4099-B213-536DE028F4E6Q37064448-2D199744-7757-40D9-AD86-8DCD043E7420Q37104359-1DAC9F29-38E1-43B0-B9B8-80DA8AC262C4Q37296364-605D172C-D21F-4E80-9201-175B3670712DQ37333276-62E3F138-60A3-4BA0-8BEE-24A6121FF816Q37466306-3A796C3D-BA02-4028-86ED-80E5A4B44593Q37500721-EF0400FE-2D34-4216-9ECB-2BD78A7259A5Q37503616-35308104-D593-4A6E-9A75-31DA2018E574Q37559311-FFA02554-E01D-4A6F-AE2F-F529BC5FCF90Q37657370-8DD64E31-B937-4FCF-8E70-70F0A2318091Q37888533-B8E0A2A9-49A2-4137-9061-E488FEA48CB8
P2860
Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005 թուականի Օգոստոսին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2005 թվականի օգոստոսին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年論文
@yue
2005年論文
@zh-hant
2005年論文
@zh-hk
2005年論文
@zh-mo
2005年論文
@zh-tw
2005年论文
@wuu
name
Outcome after less-invasive de ...... l laminotomy, and laminectomy.
@ast
Outcome after less-invasive de ...... l laminotomy, and laminectomy.
@en
Outcome after less-invasive de ...... l laminotomy, and laminectomy.
@nl
type
label
Outcome after less-invasive de ...... l laminotomy, and laminectomy.
@ast
Outcome after less-invasive de ...... l laminotomy, and laminectomy.
@en
Outcome after less-invasive de ...... l laminotomy, and laminectomy.
@nl
prefLabel
Outcome after less-invasive de ...... l laminotomy, and laminectomy.
@ast
Outcome after less-invasive de ...... l laminotomy, and laminectomy.
@en
Outcome after less-invasive de ...... l laminotomy, and laminectomy.
@nl
P2093
P1476
Outcome after less-invasive de ...... l laminotomy, and laminectomy.
@en
P2093
Christiane Pöckler-Schöniger
Claudius Thomé
Dimitris Zevgaridis
Hansjörg Bäzner
Johannes Wöhrle
Olaf Leheta
Peter Schmiedek
P304
P356
10.3171/SPI.2005.3.2.0129
P577
2005-08-01T00:00:00Z