Cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: Conservative care, laminectomy, and the Superion interspinous spacer.
about
Interspinous process spacers versus traditional decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.Cost-effectiveness of conservative versus surgical treatment strategies of lumbar spinal stenosis in the Swiss setting: analysis of the prospective multicenter Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS).Interspinous implants to treat spinal stenosis.Health Characteristics, Neuromuscular Attributes, and Mobility Among Primary Care Patients With Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Secondary Analysis.Comparison of two FDA-approved interspinous spacers for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: Superion versus X-STOP-a meta-analysis from five randomized controlled trial studies.
P2860
Cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: Conservative care, laminectomy, and the Superion interspinous spacer.
description
2015 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2015年の論文
@ja
2015年学术文章
@wuu
2015年学术文章
@zh-cn
2015年学术文章
@zh-hans
2015年学术文章
@zh-my
2015年学术文章
@zh-sg
2015年學術文章
@yue
2015年學術文章
@zh
2015年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Cost-effectiveness of three tr ...... Superion interspinous spacer.
@ast
Cost-effectiveness of three tr ...... Superion interspinous spacer.
@en
type
label
Cost-effectiveness of three tr ...... Superion interspinous spacer.
@ast
Cost-effectiveness of three tr ...... Superion interspinous spacer.
@en
prefLabel
Cost-effectiveness of three tr ...... Superion interspinous spacer.
@ast
Cost-effectiveness of three tr ...... Superion interspinous spacer.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1476
Cost-effectiveness of three tr ...... Superion interspinous spacer.
@en
P2093
Louise H Anderson
Scott L Parker
Teresa Nelson
Vikas V Patel
P2860
P356
10.14444/2028
P577
2015-07-09T00:00:00Z