Direct text entry in electronic progress notes. An evaluation of input errors.
about
The future state of clinical data capture and documentation: a report from AMIA's 2011 Policy MeetingEmergency medicine resident physicians' perceptions of electronic documentation and workflow: a mixed methods studyAre electronic medical records trustworthy? Observations on copying, pasting and duplicationMethods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical researchUsing electronic dental record data for research: a data-mapping study.Problem-centric organization and visualization of patient imaging and clinical dataDeveloping a manually annotated clinical document corpus to identify phenotypic information for inflammatory bowel disease.Documentation of pain care processes does not accurately reflect pain management delivered in primary careRelationship between documentation method and quality of chronic disease visit notes.Detecting clinically relevant new information in clinical notes across specialties and settings.Quality of data entry using single entry, double entry and automated forms processing--an example based on a study of patient-reported outcomes.Critical gaps in the world's largest electronic medical record: Ad Hoc nursing narratives and invisible adverse drug events.Managing the life cycle of electronic clinical documents.Participation in EHR based simulation improves recognition of patient safety issues.Clinical terminology support for a national ambulatory practice outcomes research networkFollowing the money: copy-paste of lifestyle counseling documentation and provider billingUse of electronic clinical documentation: time spent and team interactions.Longitudinal analysis of new information types in clinical notesImpacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: perceptions of faculty and resident physicians.Enhancing electronic health records to support clinical research.From simply inaccurate to complex and inaccurate: complexity in standards-based quality measures.Computerized condition-specific templates for improving care of geriatric syndromes in a primary care settingThe effectiveness of a bundled intervention to improve resident progress notes in an electronic health recordAssessing Electronic Note Quality Using the Physician Documentation Quality Instrument (PDQI-9)Electronic health records: Is it a risk worth taking in healthcare delivery?Improving Bridging from Informatics Theory to Practice.Clinical documentation: composition or synthesis?Preliminary development of the physician documentation quality instrument.Use of Headings and Classifications by Physicians in Medical Narratives of EHRs: An evaluation study in a Finnish hospitalCopy/paste documentation of lifestyle counseling and glycemic control in patients with diabetes: true to form?Physicians' attitudes towards copy and pasting in electronic note writing.Prevalence of copied information by attendings and residents in critical care progress notesComputerized provider documentation: findings and implications of a multisite study of clinicians and administrators.Critical issues in an electronic documentation system.Impact of electronic health record systems on information integrity: quality and safety implications.Improving the electronic health record--are clinicians getting what they wished for?Point-of-care clinical documentation: assessment of a bladder cancer informatics tool (eCancerCareBladder): a randomized controlled study of efficacy, efficiency and user friendliness compared with standard electronic medical records.Using language models to identify relevant new information in inpatient clinical notes.Professional and interprofessional differences in electronic health records use and recognition of safety issues in critically ill patients.Safe Practices for Copy and Paste in the EHR. Systematic Review, Recommendations, and Novel Model for Health IT Collaboration.
P2860
Q26850277-62B10AAD-6E89-47C2-9440-E3E155CC4865Q27301437-EB65C531-77A5-4DEC-AD77-CEC19CA46094Q28768555-CFC7A324-5CDB-42A6-A2CA-2C1BF30215E8Q29219377-D79026D1-B08F-4CC0-B1F9-FB491EA61A44Q30629581-DCA49CE6-CBF2-4959-B406-B9D6C7347D80Q33402838-012130A8-4FC8-4AA7-949D-C0C9F2564CDBQ33504361-600D02F6-6C70-4989-87FD-794C8ADA4EBFQ33730880-87D2B70F-FBF7-4A60-9E5B-3665A3ADBC25Q33845839-4D9D445E-E9E0-4009-9F4B-331C0A62C5A4Q33896284-108342F6-AC93-4356-8AC0-8977BC70E1B1Q34228559-C3F48AA0-AA3C-4787-B591-2E1F83932871Q34685924-9C4E0517-ECD1-4E8F-9C25-5A52BB10F6C5Q34806746-654D4311-239E-4C5A-87E2-B2F32CCBEF19Q34873344-1AAAD4E7-F704-4CCE-979B-D4EEE0FCB808Q35018214-D1227FEA-B378-45D2-AE1A-98515FEC0CEEQ35041850-46AB717D-0F81-401C-9573-4D6DB4C4BB1FQ35048849-D2E94E36-0C62-4BB1-A69B-A7F97C245694Q35098994-349C3A83-D136-48D3-BE17-C665C6F98783Q35179816-C8EE5441-5C8B-4AE2-B120-5D289C6FFA0FQ35569682-A60E41E5-F8DA-4526-ACAD-E602064217F9Q35624964-BDE81FB6-5ADC-4575-8284-3F4EF9319249Q35695900-D3B9E652-13FA-46AF-8D37-C04055CF4851Q35838296-98000649-2E19-46C7-97A8-12AA503E168BQ35944183-46CF2D99-E8C9-4A2D-8536-66CC015DB30DQ36367845-34D54A60-A127-41B4-90E1-D088B0719F94Q36438576-3B24B85F-A738-492E-99D7-F452EAB67A3DQ36500487-E55D6A16-86A5-40F2-B108-256BD983599EQ36741437-465ED60D-FF46-4D1D-9D78-2A908C1F5177Q36782977-86F15084-5B09-4FA2-8D55-3D8FCBE0B675Q37011688-931AADC3-28DB-4583-8345-1A0159B795B6Q37024480-96C23C6E-916F-4A4C-9F9E-E850C9813E5AQ37031509-D4288665-4424-4040-8B2A-E9089D25D183Q37039840-7DBC4BF1-E386-4934-9FDC-ACD7C705F012Q37128439-519DDC48-268B-4464-9C33-48ABE87C393AQ37231941-BF96ABB5-BCCE-466E-8B76-ED415202B488Q37381972-48ED2144-F0DF-4B79-8B9A-977F3779FF6EQ37911769-B712F1EB-7339-473B-B2F5-38CDC3527D01Q38438646-EA781C4A-7092-4D1A-A89B-137BA34983FAQ38848838-829C1366-4D20-4597-AAF2-CB22B9752894Q39028093-AA806EAF-11E6-4229-BCF6-732419E507C2
P2860
Direct text entry in electronic progress notes. An evaluation of input errors.
description
2003 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2003 թուականի Յունուարին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2003 թվականի հունվարին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2003年の論文
@ja
2003年論文
@yue
2003年論文
@zh-hant
2003年論文
@zh-hk
2003年論文
@zh-mo
2003年論文
@zh-tw
2003年论文
@wuu
name
Direct text entry in electronic progress notes. An evaluation of input errors.
@ast
Direct text entry in electronic progress notes. An evaluation of input errors.
@en
type
label
Direct text entry in electronic progress notes. An evaluation of input errors.
@ast
Direct text entry in electronic progress notes. An evaluation of input errors.
@en
prefLabel
Direct text entry in electronic progress notes. An evaluation of input errors.
@ast
Direct text entry in electronic progress notes. An evaluation of input errors.
@en
P2093
P1476
Direct text entry in electronic progress notes. An evaluation of input errors
@en
P2093
P577
2003-01-01T00:00:00Z