A comparison of policy and direct practice stakeholder perceptions of factors affecting evidence-based practice implementation using concept mapping.
about
Harnessing implementation science to improve care quality and patient safety: a systematic review of targeted literaturePublic health program capacity for sustainability: a new frameworkInterventions in fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: An international perspective.Why a successful task substitution in glaucoma care could not be transferred from a hospital setting to a primary care setting: a qualitative study.Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research.From Theory to Practice: One Agency's Experience with Implementing an Evidence-Based ModelCollaboration, negotiation, and coalescence for interagency-collaborative teams to scale-up evidence-based practice.A Common Elements Treatment Approach for Adult Mental Health Problems in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Sustainability of evidence-based healthcare: research agenda, methodological advances, and infrastructure support.Dynamic adaptation process to implement an evidence-based child maltreatment intervention.Reporting of feasibility factors in publications on integrated treatment programs for women with substance abuse issues and their children: a systematic review and analysis.Between and within-site variation in qualitative implementation research.Using concept mapping in the knowledge-to-action process to compare stakeholder opinions on barriers to use of cancer screening among South Asians.The role of collaborations in sustaining an evidence-based intervention to reduce child neglect.A Multi-Stakeholder Process to Transform a Community-based Screening and Referral Program to Implement Evidence-Based Depression Care.Leadership, innovation climate, and attitudes toward evidence-based practice during a statewide implementation.A concept mapping approach to guide and understand dissemination and implementation.Tracking implementation strategies: a description of a practical approach and early findings.Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC): protocol for a mixed methods study.Scalable Options for Extended Skill Building Following Didactic Training in Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Anxious Youth: A Pilot Randomized Trial.Setting strategy for system change: using concept mapping to prioritise national action for chronic disease prevention.Methods to Improve the Selection and Tailoring of Implementation Strategies.A Multi-Level Examination of Stakeholder Perspectives of Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices in a Large Urban Publicly-Funded Mental Health System.Barriers associated with the implementation of an advance care planning program in a prison setting.The impact of orthopaedic research evidence on health financing in Australia.Mixed-method analysis of program leader perspectives on the sustainment of multiple child evidence-based practices in a system-driven implementation.The Transportability of Contingency Management in Problem-solving Courts
P2860
Q26824770-15771697-23B4-4B0A-B9ED-29A5109AF831Q26852931-42A110AF-5108-4A81-A6FB-88C686CB9CB1Q30244125-54E2C059-F216-4328-A93C-9BEFD7CC1D66Q30536302-04C23BF1-5AFC-4379-B5E9-05E99789F59CQ30689282-6A17265E-F018-4032-B46C-11463D1AB806Q34206259-4D9013D1-8CFC-44B9-82B9-CDD9EF0C54ECQ34957907-464B651C-8425-493E-B6D9-7BA8290B4A53Q35006733-DFD08366-3F4D-4EA2-B2C0-AFF5A6FE6A93Q35827942-22262E70-75D1-4B35-88BA-83A19716CF24Q36217841-AF15E14A-C24D-4BC1-9A21-0B1100B81C48Q36541701-8D866A15-30F8-4747-96B4-23C6B3470F74Q36687340-BBCB1F6B-0D76-4B49-97AA-35855E4EFED1Q36741566-1846D93F-5D5F-420E-AF4A-793EAC882D24Q36757812-4080AE75-85A9-4669-8248-B93D82661AF5Q37270968-3900F139-668A-4808-A678-99288F579AC8Q37344306-66D975EE-75DF-43A7-B639-72B9BF83193EQ37344310-CB3EA974-ADE7-4AEA-BA24-8F14FCFD335AQ37663476-15A8ECAF-74FB-4F91-ABFF-CFBA63AE0020Q37703349-ECB04673-C1D3-4A85-8B3C-B826EC5E1E54Q38487706-FED15091-E3F6-4ED8-A143-DC74D12349E8Q38636519-04F81764-5D3C-4B21-A4F5-2280D74C5E9DQ38972657-2F6D72B8-9285-4616-875E-BCC6340654F5Q40337154-D914C747-4622-4FD7-95A7-09F0D1E1684EQ51763473-D06628AA-630F-4405-80F3-C7DC7AC64B00Q54989179-AEEE483C-5817-453E-86D3-A20389194148Q55023989-05CD2FDE-4A26-49EB-AEDF-3A56E283004AQ57307998-C5D9D2EB-0A9E-45EB-A201-6AB90F10C563
P2860
A comparison of policy and direct practice stakeholder perceptions of factors affecting evidence-based practice implementation using concept mapping.
description
2011 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2011 թուականի Սեպտեմբերին հրատարակուած գիտական յօդուած
@hyw
2011 թվականի սեպտեմբերին հրատարակված գիտական հոդված
@hy
2011年の論文
@ja
2011年論文
@yue
2011年論文
@zh-hant
2011年論文
@zh-hk
2011年論文
@zh-mo
2011年論文
@zh-tw
2011年论文
@wuu
name
A comparison of policy and dir ...... ntation using concept mapping.
@ast
A comparison of policy and dir ...... ntation using concept mapping.
@en
type
label
A comparison of policy and dir ...... ntation using concept mapping.
@ast
A comparison of policy and dir ...... ntation using concept mapping.
@en
prefLabel
A comparison of policy and dir ...... ntation using concept mapping.
@ast
A comparison of policy and dir ...... ntation using concept mapping.
@en
P2860
P356
P1476
A comparison of policy and dir ...... ntation using concept mapping.
@en
P2093
Amy E Green
Gregory A Aarons
P2860
P2888
P356
10.1186/1748-5908-6-104
P577
2011-09-07T00:00:00Z
P5875
P6179
1038522214