QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature.
about
The greatest happiness of the greatest number? Policy actors' perspectives on the limits of economic evaluation as a tool for informing health care coverage decisions in ThailandHealth-related quality of life and socioeconomic status: inequalities among adults with a chronic diseaseWhy equal treatment is not always equitable: the impact of existing ethnic health inequalities in cost-effectiveness modeling.Why do health technology assessment coverage recommendations for the same drugs differ across settings? Applying a mixed methods framework to systematically compare orphan drug decisions in four European countriesQuality of life and affective well-being in middle-aged and older people with chronic medical illnesses: a cross-sectional population based studyAge as a criterion for setting priorities in health care? A survey of the German public viewPricing and reimbursement of orphan drugs: the need for more transparencyPrioritising health service innovation investments using public preferences: a discrete choice experimentGuidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysisPatient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment in clinical trials: a systematic review of guidance for trial protocol writersExploring what lies behind public preferences for avoiding health losses caused by lapses in healthcare safety and patient lifestyle choicesHow to assess the value of medicines?A think aloud study comparing the validity and acceptability of discrete choice and best worst scaling methods.Extending life for people with a terminal illness: a moral right and an expensive death? Exploring societal perspectives.The post-2015 development agenda: keeping our focus on the worst off.Are all health gains equally important? An exploration of acceptable health as a reference point in health care priority settingThe relevance of personal characteristics in allocating health care resources-controversial preferences of laypersons with different educational backgrounds.Societal preferences for standard health insurance coverage in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional studyWho Shall Not Be Treated: Public Attitudes on Setting Health Care Priorities by Person-Based Criteria in 28 NationsEconomic evaluation: what does a nurse manager need to know?Drugs for exceptionally rare diseases: do they deserve special status for funding?Societal perspective on access to publicly subsidised medicines: A cross sectional survey of 3080 adults in Australia.Valuing QALYs in Relation to Equity Considerations Using a Discrete Choice ExperimentBalancing equity and efficiency in the Dutch basic benefits package using the principle of proportional shortfallIs the value of a life or life-year saved context specific? Further evidence from a discrete choice experiment."Pay them if it works": discrete choice experiments on the acceptability of financial incentives to change health related behaviour.WTP for a QALY and health states: More money for severer health states?Outcomes in Economic Evaluations of Public Health Interventions in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Health, Capabilities and Subjective WellbeingChoosing vs. allocating: discrete choice experiments and constant-sum paired comparisons for the elicitation of societal preferencesThe prioritization preferences of pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review members and the Canadian public: a stated-preferences comparisonExplicit incorporation of equity considerations into economic evaluation of public health interventions.A cost-based equity weight for use in the economic evaluation of primary health care interventions: case study of the Australian Indigenous populationCommunicating treatment effectiveness in the context of chronic disease processes.Social values in health priority setting: a conceptual framework.Transforming EQ-5D utilities for use in cost–value analysis of health programs.A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting.Distribution-Weighted Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Using Lifetime Health Loss.Economic evaluation of mental health interventions: an introduction to cost-utility analysis.Methodological and applied concerns surrounding age-related weighting within health economic evaluation.Maximizing Health or Sufficient Capability in Economic Evaluation? A Methodological Experiment of Treatment for Drug Addiction.
P2860
Q33372003-EA8B5FEC-96A2-4ED3-8D70-3A8F87136810Q33573045-7F28BD9E-B5CD-4D0F-8B92-82E1B65A559EQ33719771-AAC6923C-B394-472D-AFFF-DE9A447812ABQ33840393-344009AE-90AF-4A0D-BBBF-EFD24BBEE3E9Q33895224-C7988C0E-FFC2-493C-8626-651D9B37B178Q34014462-C96D1DD3-42D9-417E-BD2F-56551ECD5A3FQ34193502-4C22FEE0-F708-434A-B5EC-146BD4719754Q34199406-73948409-2EC1-446C-9018-7FD5B7E3638CQ34224295-9DF9E8AE-78EF-4525-81BC-1188E96F23A4Q34344385-718921DE-2408-4A1E-ADB2-A9483E9CDE25Q34790317-B0395564-6D8C-4B33-B095-F4B18B4BE4E3Q34983557-81D1B067-5CC5-4A47-8D95-362622A8EC98Q35155987-5BCF2C29-03A3-4ACD-82AB-19EE5933B8B1Q35169816-3F757000-3620-4D02-9653-6F16C69D9033Q35692438-A7814A89-D748-4972-89A4-38F68FAB80BDQ35701649-B3DCBA9C-3505-4390-BB43-0D9C988AD59CQ35859888-BE55357C-AFFD-4B4E-9D5D-DF28C2EB3E45Q35882015-278F8B18-3B7B-441A-935E-917FD2053C66Q36046734-5986826E-32A1-47F7-AA26-2EC75286D816Q36234152-AF1D0415-E8DB-4BED-99B0-9C4F33F58160Q36276435-3DFCD2FA-588F-4329-AC2A-5B0D8A07FE4EQ36294029-98C83A34-80B2-470E-97C4-CD89BAD6F99FQ36322926-3CA13881-3407-49C3-8A67-73903BB2157BQ36503324-4670B9BC-2D0E-446F-BBFC-9C6BF5E84E0FQ36693581-78118D5A-DBFE-46A4-AE70-1093E4C750E0Q36940196-8312E235-C810-4C1B-B5A1-284FAAFB65E9Q37153838-DF02E2F1-09DE-41D9-AFBD-6E9B48C57D3AQ37295853-A75B4AFB-069C-4D14-870C-B204D6BBD06AQ37333597-37DD66EE-5A9A-4126-8CFD-15E9F210CFD1Q37367877-8651DEA8-273E-4213-B972-D50A65CD4FB7Q37392991-E71F8A8C-CF04-4DA6-9EFF-09C8D793ABB0Q37402104-F79EB7A0-5325-4226-92E1-0664C4D3768AQ37763159-F92B80E3-0E10-4442-9364-4FDD85FE88BBQ38031243-652FB61B-F1FA-483A-81D1-B29FC88FE83EQ38198552-44559EAA-7C74-468F-A5A3-BEB8FF3F06ACQ38215716-4D7B31DF-2286-4B89-A5DB-04032B2E55CFQ38720758-6A8D551B-6DA6-45F8-A7A0-2F373D41C47AQ38807617-59B7F500-78DC-47F0-9392-F6BFED86ED42Q39157429-618DC897-A395-4A96-95D0-924EDFD87BB2Q39179389-43CFE019-CCF5-43D9-9C9F-5C108A317EEB
P2860
QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature.
description
2005 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2005年の論文
@ja
2005年学术文章
@wuu
2005年学术文章
@zh-cn
2005年学术文章
@zh-hans
2005年学术文章
@zh-my
2005年学术文章
@zh-sg
2005年學術文章
@yue
2005年學術文章
@zh
2005年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature.
@ast
QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature.
@en
type
label
QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature.
@ast
QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature.
@en
prefLabel
QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature.
@ast
QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature.
@en
P2093
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature
@en
P2093
Alan Williams
Paul Dolan
Rebecca Shaw
P2860
P304
P356
10.1002/HEC.924
P407
P50
P577
2005-02-01T00:00:00Z