about
What do hospital decision-makers in Ontario, Canada, have to say about the fairness of priority setting in their institutions?The equivalence of numbers: the social value of avoiding health decline: an experimental Web-based studyHow do Zimbabweans value health states?Secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in older British men: extent of inequalities before and after implementation of the National Service Framework'Bourdieu', medical elites and 'social class': a qualitative study of 'desert island' doctors.General practitioners' perceptions and attitudes to infertility management in primary care: focus group study.Waiting times and prioritization for coronary artery bypass surgery in New Zealand.Ageism in cardiology.Age as a criterion for setting priorities in health care? A survey of the German public viewRationing: a transatlantic perspective.Prioritising health service innovation investments using public preferences: a discrete choice experimentPrimary care group commissioning of services: the differing priorities of general practitioners and district nurses for palliative care services.The health of their nation: how would citizens develop England's health strategy?A time for change and a time for equality--infertility services and the NHS.Resource allocation, social values and the QALY: a review of the debate and empirical evidenceEquity in access to exercise tolerance testing, coronary angiography, and coronary artery bypass grafting by age, sex and clinical indicationsEvaluation of outreach clinics held by specialists in general practice in EnglandThe relevance of personal characteristics in allocating health care resources-controversial preferences of laypersons with different educational backgrounds.QALY maximisation and people's preferences: a methodological review of the literature.Who Shall Not Be Treated: Public Attitudes on Setting Health Care Priorities by Person-Based Criteria in 28 NationsCitizen deliberation in setting health-care prioritiesSetting priorities: is there a role for citizens' juries?Public participation and the moral quality of healthcare rationing.Deciding how NHS money is spent: a survey of general public and medical views.Opinions of Swedish citizens, health-care politicians, administrators and doctors on rationing and health-care financing.Principles of distributive justice used by members of the general public in the allocation of donor liver grafts for transplantation: a qualitative study.Public views on priority setting for high cost medications in public hospitals in Australia.The public's priorities in health services.Effect of discussion and deliberation on the public's views of priority setting in health care: focus group study.Social values in health priority setting: a conceptual framework.Public engagement in setting healthcare priorities: a ranking exercise in Cyprus.A note on the relative importance that people attach to different factors when setting priorities in health care.Consumerism and health care: the example of fertility treatment.Initial disease severity and quality of care of emergency department sepsis patients who are older or younger than 70 years of age.Understanding public preferences for prioritizing health care interventions in England: does the type of health gain matter?Consulting the public about the NHS.Priority setting in health care. Of course we should ask the tax payer.Rationing in the NHS. Public does not always favour lifesaving, acute interventions.Rationing health care: moving the debate forward.Why the NHS should fund infertility services.
P2860
Q24800220-3E443030-1024-44ED-9F13-034F5323CC81Q24805171-9FD6089F-154A-4B4D-BBD7-B4D2E1991EB6Q24806895-980EFA68-361C-489C-834A-7F831B2C97DFQ28191878-89F8BF31-E444-4B36-B2F7-8CAA0E4426C9Q30361574-731573DB-9FE9-46AE-AB39-92407FD1FFE2Q30483470-26983A17-6CBA-4850-B758-6C4E0A59DDD3Q33640416-AE1623DD-712D-4142-941C-432970ED3A2DQ33776547-B7037641-618C-45BF-815C-06220E5D1729Q34014462-CC033622-C2A1-434A-80CB-359610C0CBC0Q34055170-49631918-CC99-4C1F-910A-4B4021497621Q34199406-4D5853C8-C04B-4195-9EE7-C2A1E6D090C0Q34216597-C3C916BC-FBF7-411A-8C40-ADE445EC8ED0Q34217467-E034F91E-7B43-4BA2-B966-6EC559216767Q34446796-73247360-D217-4718-B12A-BF96A51C16CFQ34801387-D9DC3FCA-F8DC-4285-82B9-9CEA9167618AQ35379484-173F7552-BB6C-4E1F-B8C9-A20C653E7BFEQ35401122-5F6515F0-0B06-429B-95F3-C5C84AEC5D73Q35859888-8732BD6E-0898-409D-A5FA-8A6FA1481C64Q35896287-6A3983C8-7242-49E9-82D4-88C6D9DF57DFQ36046734-3FAD2568-24BC-4FD8-AE48-6C057F964CBCQ36110070-05083C6B-8F00-4CFD-9079-B1C7762C15EFQ36598945-6B58F7F5-914D-48BD-B2BD-384794ADD989Q36790779-02142937-1B09-40A7-B045-FB96B59E81A8Q37331420-D8E16FED-F2F5-45CD-9AAC-B4EE4DB2989DQ37331479-08852BC7-FA81-4ED9-8DC0-3DF6A852F736Q37331507-1E1C6F19-096C-4474-B8C1-6FBB3D005668Q37332117-420A7B07-29EF-4EE9-BA3C-762AE56ABFA5Q37333367-FDC3A2AB-C4D9-4536-986B-BBF86B358243Q37431420-87FD45FE-BE3B-44EB-9118-02973E1D7C67Q38031243-FC23095B-6515-4EE3-86E2-7BCE483CA64EQ40083087-C6878428-DECE-4C9B-A30C-ED5A9D1B5BF1Q41434344-0EE228A9-C82C-4A09-A850-61F92511C46CQ41760026-5CFD8B48-31B6-43EC-A096-1BE74F3D821AQ42363570-1DE603F9-A9B8-4DFF-A161-27CA66F974F9Q42595565-75D791F4-CB89-4FCE-B926-B1C42B9457A2Q42726976-D6E750D1-0A58-4FD1-BEF3-044B4837BD69Q42768764-9EB624DD-CDFA-44D4-915D-979047473958Q42972487-F24A16BB-B37E-4C42-91B6-3A50C692ECF4Q43188486-C57B4CD4-8DA4-4AE5-9E68-E479A8904FD6Q43275634-CC635B96-433C-475D-996C-11C06EF03715
P2860
description
1996 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
1996年の論文
@ja
1996年論文
@yue
1996年論文
@zh-hant
1996年論文
@zh-hk
1996年論文
@zh-mo
1996年論文
@zh-tw
1996年论文
@wuu
1996年论文
@zh
1996年论文
@zh-cn
name
Health care rationing: the public's debate
@ast
Health care rationing: the public's debate
@en
type
label
Health care rationing: the public's debate
@ast
Health care rationing: the public's debate
@en
prefLabel
Health care rationing: the public's debate
@ast
Health care rationing: the public's debate
@en
P2860
P356
P1433
P1476
Health care rationing: the public's debate
@en
P2093
P2860
P304
P356
10.1136/BMJ.312.7032.670
P407
P577
1996-03-01T00:00:00Z