Improving the fairness of multiple-choice questions: a literature review.
about
Learning while evaluating: the use of an electronic evaluation portfolio in a geriatric medicine clerkship.An assessment of functioning and non-functioning distractors in multiple-choice questions: a descriptive analysisMid-level healthcare personnel training: an evaluation of the revised, nationally-standardized, pre-service curriculum for clinical officers in Mozambique.Physician and patient predictors of evidence-based prescribing in heart failure: a multilevel study.Evaluation of validity of midwifery special courses in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.Exploring Clinical Reasoning Strategies and Test-Taking Behaviors During Clinical Vignette Style Multiple-Choice Examinations: A Mixed Methods StudyGuidelines for the construction of multiple choice questions tests.Validity: one word with a plurality of meanings.Validity of very short answer versus single best answer questions for undergraduate assessmentCertainty rating in pre-and post-tests of study modules in an online clinical pharmacy course - A pilot study to evaluate teaching and learning.Effectiveness of a 1-year resident training program in clinical research: a controlled before-and-after study.Web-based learning strategies in combination with published guidelines to change practice of primary care professionals.Gynaecological laparoscopy courses in the United Arab Emirates.Metrics in medical educationDental students' peer assessment: a prospective pilot study.Biosciences in nurse education: is the curriculum fit for practice? Lecturers' views and recommendations from across the UK.Analysis of use of a single best answer format in an undergraduate medical examination.The effect of images on item statistics in multiple choice anatomy examinations.Learning assessment at shoulder surgical skills course.A participatory learning approach to biochemistry using student authored and evaluated multiple-choice questions.Does student confidence on multiple-choice question assessments provide useful information?Misconceptions amongst dental students: How can they be identified?Exploring examinee behaviours as validity evidence for multiple-choice question examinations.Climbing Bloom's taxonomy pyramid: Lessons from a graduate histology course.The audience response system and knowledge gain: a prospective study.[Cues and pseudocues in surgical multiple choice questions from the German state examination].A "do-it-yourself" interactive bone structure module: development and evaluation of an online teaching resource.Reintroducing photosynthesis.Enhanced podcasts for teaching biochemistry to veterinary students.Knowledge maps: a tool for online assessment with automated feedback.Using differential item functioning to evaluate potential bias in a high stakes postgraduate knowledge based assessment.Sure, or unsure? Measuring students' confidence and the potential impact on patient safety in multiple-choice questions.Trainers' and trainees' perceptions of workplace-based assessment in orthodontics.Comparing Item Performance on Three- Versus Four-Option Multiple Choice Questions in a Veterinary Toxicology Course.
P2860
Q25255586-EF018D43-1EEC-492B-88CE-3342382241A5Q33478751-C7C479A3-8876-43DD-BAA7-8F391F80DB52Q33961884-A374724D-DFA8-4955-B59C-38223EB3B667Q34170504-127D359C-11CE-4E0C-8A3F-D3B9167B2F15Q35646363-170D9673-F1C5-4791-AF05-A5822CA87CCDQ35770364-1138B4E9-0F9D-4CE9-B19E-1244C3528937Q36133825-40E9BCD6-4D25-469B-95C2-7E7C1DEC0ADBQ36151572-D1419EE9-E8B3-4AAF-91CD-CC12FF7D53D0Q36163158-83A11A44-6E56-4014-A7FB-25EC59A4C1A7Q36164120-744E92E3-09F5-4AF8-9EEB-07B0EF694B78Q36607200-C2558B67-ABCB-4AE5-AF5A-3D7AFA69A340Q37069918-18789920-C538-484B-8883-C14D75113828Q37299222-58473DE0-D24F-4B60-8BCF-AE3DB42CDB56Q37813433-419912E0-549E-4BCA-8738-911259AB6F6AQ38244311-D31CCA8E-1F11-47DB-88D9-5CEA448619E4Q38491258-EC56CF0C-721A-4329-9CA4-20A1195AEF10Q38819104-23643846-C789-4830-95BC-8F6521364D40Q39545230-EB9B0F2D-2E02-433B-87A9-4D7921B39C0AQ39671790-B85BED37-9FCD-497C-968A-CA4A4A1F71B7Q39703924-AE27EDDC-2515-44C8-822B-3A6333F071F5Q44195709-B8519CB9-E128-4558-8713-0D4E6A9B0590Q46279212-3D7C2035-C79B-4C73-A0D2-975B266173D5Q48267572-2C7592D7-CF7B-4F4C-86F8-B799FF9975F6Q48533937-0361C666-72C3-4695-A8A3-DEDEC1530E07Q48534366-0B403E35-E1E7-4162-B7F4-347D28B8AFD0Q50486232-D8F427AF-548C-476C-9659-F679F24EA3B4Q50782353-1B546515-4A89-4A38-B2E4-23E7D12E7B20Q51803491-E34CD51B-3C84-4881-96A7-9C74E6C90BB2Q51847564-CE7419F6-1788-4509-A704-B462654A73D4Q52613758-4FF4A271-976F-45D0-BE94-4F11D7230D42Q53075821-00F7AFB1-3029-417C-9386-0B387917DFC2Q53116189-FFC315B5-5DF8-4FD1-9633-671A54F96D74Q53405827-8807DDCA-7FA9-4B2F-8559-AB67AC65C9FAQ55513542-BD14EF41-C207-4D31-A860-F7FFF6C47E01
P2860
Improving the fairness of multiple-choice questions: a literature review.
description
2004 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2004年の論文
@ja
2004年論文
@yue
2004年論文
@zh-hant
2004年論文
@zh-hk
2004年論文
@zh-mo
2004年論文
@zh-tw
2004年论文
@wuu
2004年论文
@zh
2004年论文
@zh-cn
name
Improving the fairness of multiple-choice questions: a literature review.
@ast
Improving the fairness of multiple-choice questions: a literature review.
@en
type
label
Improving the fairness of multiple-choice questions: a literature review.
@ast
Improving the fairness of multiple-choice questions: a literature review.
@en
prefLabel
Improving the fairness of multiple-choice questions: a literature review.
@ast
Improving the fairness of multiple-choice questions: a literature review.
@en
P1433
P1476
Improving the fairness of multiple-choice questions: a literature review.
@en
P2093
Paul McCoubrie
P304
P356
10.1080/01421590400013495
P577
2004-12-01T00:00:00Z