Interprofessional education in the care of people diagnosed with dementia and their carers: a systematic review

about

The benefits of interprofessional education 10 years on.Educating for collaborative practice: an interpretation of current achievements and thoughts for future directions.

P2860

Q39459329-F48D2917-16ED-411A-A55B-BE0637F8F935 Q47912494-82271513-259B-4111-A6BF-D21975271E67

P2860

Interprofessional education in the care of people diagnosed with dementia and their carers: a systematic review

Item

http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q36105487

description

2016 nî lūn-bûn

@nan

2016年の論文

@ja

2016年論文

@yue

2016年論文

@zh-hant

2016年論文

@zh-hk

2016年論文

@zh-mo

2016年論文

@zh-tw

2016年论文

@wuu

2016年论文

@zh

2016年论文

@zh-cn

name

Interprofessional education in ...... ir carers: a systematic review

@ast

Interprofessional education in ...... ir carers: a systematic review

@en

type

Item

label

Interprofessional education in ...... ir carers: a systematic review

@ast

Interprofessional education in ...... ir carers: a systematic review

@en

prefLabel

Interprofessional education in ...... ir carers: a systematic review

@ast

Interprofessional education in ...... ir carers: a systematic review

@en

P1476

Interprofessional education in ...... ir carers: a systematic review

@en

P2093

Anne Marie Hassenkamp

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Claire Emery

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Ferruccio Pelone

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Kumud Titmarsh

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Marcus Jackson

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Nan Greenwood

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Scott Reeves

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P275

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial

P2860

Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (update)

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study

What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

Language of publication restrictions in systematic reviews gave different results depending on whether the intervention was conventional or complementary

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation

The positive impact of interprofessional education: a controlled trial to evaluate a programme for health professional students.

An evidence-based clinical approach to the diagnosis of dementia.

Few systematic reviews exist documenting the extent of bias: a systematic review.

P304

e010948

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P31

scholarly article

review article

P356

10.1136/BMJOPEN-2015-010948

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P433

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P478

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P5008

ScienceSource

P577

2016-08-16T00:00:00Z

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime

P698

27531724

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

P921

dementia

P932

5013417

http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string

Interprofessional education in the care of people diagnosed with dementia and their carers: a systematic review

about

P2860

P2860

Interprofessional education in the care of people diagnosed with dementia and their carers: a systematic review

description

name

type

label

prefLabel

P1433

P1476

P2093

P275

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P5008

P577

P698

P921

P932

P356

P1433

P1476

P2093

P275

P2860

P304

P31

P356

P433

P478

P5008

P577

P698

P921

P932