ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
about
Clinician-targeted interventions to reduce antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections in primary care: an overview of systematic reviewsThe risks and benefits of patients temporarily discontinuing medications in the event of an intercurrent illness: a systematic review protocolOptions for basing Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) on chronic disease endpoints: report from a joint US-/Canadian-sponsored working groupRisk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Non-Randomized Studies of Adverse Cardiovascular Effects of Thiazolidinediones and Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: Application of a New Cochrane Risk of Bias ToolNutritional interventions or exposures in infants and children aged up to 3 years and their effects on subsequent risk of overweight, obesity and body fat: a systematic review of systematic reviews[Systematic errors in clinical studies : A comprehensive survey].Mental health training programmes for non-mental health trained professionals coming into contact with people with mental ill health: a systematic review of effectiveness.An overview of systematic reviews of complementary and alternative therapies for fibromyalgia using both AMSTAR and ROBIS as quality assessment tools.Identifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study.Early-Life Obesity Prevention: Critique of Intervention Trials During the First One Thousand Days.Promotion of physical activity interventions for community dwelling older adults: A systematic review of reviews.Selecting and implementing overview methods: implications from five exemplar overviews.Assessment and prevention of behavioural and social risk factors associated with oral cancer: protocol for a systematic review of clinical guidelines and systematic reviews to inform Primary Care dental professionals.Evidence map of studies evaluating methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of systematic reviews of interventions: rationale and design.The art and science of study identification: a comparative analysis of two systematic reviews.Nonpharmacologic, nonherbal management of menopause-associated vasomotor symptoms: an umbrella systematic review (protocol)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study.Pharmacological interventions for delirium in intensive care patients: a protocol for an overview of reviewsPoor methodological quality and reporting standards of systematic reviews in burn care management.Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.Effectiveness of needle and syringe Programmes in people who inject drugs - An overview of systematic reviewsTailoring implementation strategies for evidence-based recommendations using computerised clinical decision support systems: protocol for the development of the GUIDES tools.When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist.Designing a rapid response program to support evidence-informed decision-making in the Americas region: using the best available evidence and case studies.Use of existing systematic reviews for evidence assessments in infectious disease prevention: a comparative case study.ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.Linking families with pre-school children from healthcare services to community resources: a systematic review protocol.Convergent and sequential synthesis designs: implications for conducting and reporting systematic reviews of qualitative and quantitative evidence.No confidence that success rates of self-drilling and self-tapping insertion techniques of orthodontic mini-implants are similar.Non-publication and publication bias in reproductive medicine: a cohort analysis.Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality.Female pelvic organ prolapse using pessaries: systematic review.The 300 most cited articles published in periodontology.Interventions for sustained healthcare professional behaviour change: a protocol for an overview of reviews.A Neuropsychologist's Guide To Undertaking a Systematic Review for Publication: Making the most of PRISMA Guidelines.Integrated multidisciplinary care for the management of chronic conditions in adults: an overview of reviews and an example of using indirect evidence to inform clinical practice recommendations in the field of rare diseases.Interventional Radiology Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations for Neurovascular Disorders Are Not Based on High-Quality Systematic Reviews.A systematic review of evidence relating to clinical supervision for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals.The landscape of systematic reviews in urology (1998 to 2015): an assessment of methodological quality.Inter-rater reliability of AMSTAR is dependent on the pair of reviewers
P2860
Q26471802-0A501EB1-530B-4CCD-8A3E-70F1D4D4C7A2Q26779761-CD75AFCB-14DB-440D-8516-2F467C8A163BQ28076931-4D25290F-083C-4A49-9E55-70A769CA4557Q28551188-EFA8B2E7-1F5C-4472-97C9-132875DAB11CQ30244459-90322278-ECA0-4CEF-BB8A-E096CCF2849BQ30399086-E587B855-2276-4388-BE03-5411F6AB25F6Q30853559-7C7A6BAB-F17E-4306-9D8E-65602E72186EQ33691579-8DD87151-9B7B-4400-9D49-7BA1E68E69A6Q33814405-C8A088E5-9740-4A46-A9F4-C6DC64CBC464Q33844774-365A635B-F13A-460C-A4EE-E1B918FDDC21Q33897863-7E6A68A2-F7A0-4A0B-8C9D-D6C87D8E1CFCQ33916672-3BFAE80B-9E04-4B49-83D2-95426F54DFD4Q35875308-3C8EA986-A36E-45BF-8198-5963A0140A85Q35887528-87E0E2F0-410B-4F3C-8859-CE70532592C8Q35934526-3DC093DC-5C9F-4629-8F18-860B5506A77CQ35983077-554E44CB-0592-4207-AC59-2FC2C5C55F18Q36027782-47E96DF1-ADA6-4565-B738-F3DF2602DDF3Q36214472-EF9AB95C-D3D6-4468-B4DA-20264EAC5BD0Q36227743-8A93D5B1-DED4-4827-B70D-72A21D315FD2Q36320887-831A6DB7-B838-4660-BFCF-A26C19960F4CQ36343824-CB16D873-81D1-4A5D-B392-CAC674BF4538Q36655339-73E6F9C8-559D-45BC-85C7-014E0A10AFC4Q37114403-17BF0B3C-DC31-4D7A-9479-C7E4B4D1AFFEQ37188802-D5940D90-47CE-4E32-AD92-13D54A71EBDFQ37326261-E9BBDC62-D22B-48A2-80ED-0F2AC16B40FCQ37335426-61A82071-24EC-4595-8B6A-89EC5E957C89Q37686366-F094899D-398D-40EE-8157-0CEE0883E830Q37719705-CAD5A534-684B-46AB-ACD0-93190B356D96Q38374902-41F373EF-1C43-4AE3-8A12-E4CB3070C16AQ38602013-03B33874-2E24-40B4-AACF-A0E7C9C50BE0Q38673534-B65DC55C-7AC3-4679-A576-DCC7094E4DCBQ38780662-A92FAFFE-96DC-42A9-BA47-B3769F255730Q38795439-9A26E617-420F-4FBF-8047-9E55F2DFE4C8Q38811953-32F978A9-DF6B-41C0-8F1F-5FE13F6ACCB9Q38837823-AA9395ED-13B0-473B-9CED-5F4D84F067E2Q38878434-E077C952-8C68-49C6-B702-9D5005401574Q38983036-60B8565F-75D7-4A5A-A442-4FA5DB5B0D24Q39029374-C2A17408-4180-417F-8747-8979EA36BB66Q39406932-1321C5F9-501F-490E-94DC-1B550A239ADBQ39426104-FB85ED00-874D-42CF-A5FC-AA9DEEC6A4B6
P2860
ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
description
2015 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2015年の論文
@ja
2015年学术文章
@wuu
2015年学术文章
@zh-cn
2015年学术文章
@zh-hans
2015年学术文章
@zh-my
2015年学术文章
@zh-sg
2015年學術文章
@yue
2015年學術文章
@zh
2015年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
@ast
ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
@en
type
label
ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
@ast
ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
@en
prefLabel
ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
@ast
ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
@en
P2093
P2860
P50
P1476
ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
@en
P2093
Barnaby C Reeves
Beverley Shea
Deborah M Caldwell
Jos Kleijnen
ROBIS group
Rachel Churchill
P2860
P304
P356
10.1016/J.JCLINEPI.2015.06.005
P577
2015-06-16T00:00:00Z