Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening
about
The need for supplemental breast cancer screening modalities: a perspective of population-based breast cancer screening programs in Japan.Position paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, FraAgreement between Breast Percentage Density Estimations from Standard-Dose versus Synthetic Digital Mammograms: Results from a Large Screening Cohort Using Automated MeasuresThe effect of volumetric breast density on the risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancers: a cohort study.Qualitative Versus Quantitative Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: Applications for the US and AbroadMammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer in women with atypical hyperplasia: an observational cohort study from the Mayo Clinic Benign Breast Disease (BBD) cohort.Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography.Radiation dose affected by mammographic composition and breast size: first application of a radiation dose management system for full-field digital mammography in Korean women.Combining quantitative and qualitative breast density measures to assess breast cancer risk.Family History of Breast Cancer, Breast Density, and Breast Cancer Risk in a U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Population.Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.Population-Attributable Risk Proportion of Clinical Risk Factors for Breast Cancer.Racial Differences in Quantitative Measures of Area and Volumetric Breast Density.Longitudinal Changes in Volumetric Breast Density with Tamoxifen and Aromatase Inhibitors.Using automated texture features to determine the probability for masking of a tumor on mammography, but not ultrasound.Adiposity during early adulthood, changes in adiposity during adulthood, attained adiposity, and mammographic density among premenopausal women.Computer-aided assessment of breast density: comparison of supervised deep learning and feature-based statistical learning.Breast tissue density change after oophorectomy in BRCA mutation carrier patients using visual and volumetric analysis.Beyond BI-RADS Density: A Call for Quantification in the Breast Imaging Clinic.Risk, Prediction and Prevention of Hereditary Breast Cancer - Large-Scale Genomic Studies in Times of Big and Smart Data.The combined effect of mammographic texture and density on breast cancer risk: a cohort study.Exploring the prediction performance for breast cancer risk based on volumetric mammographic density at different thresholds.Quantitative background parenchymal uptake on molecular breast imaging and breast cancer risk: a case-control study.Density and tailored breast cancer screening: practice and prediction - an overviewVolumetric breast density and risk of advanced cancers after a negative screening episode: a cohort study
P2860
Q30249866-4F3D16A2-1B4A-4FC4-92D7-932B663D00BCQ32186742-E167367C-191A-44B1-98A5-178E6A26C8FEQ33750745-4F58C126-645D-497F-BE69-29265D8778BFQ33768341-20E3498F-9B59-4811-855E-BD7D36A73F17Q33850485-091E2BD7-3A01-4837-B73A-592635ADB5AEQ36265458-ADDE52F3-B162-47BA-B215-4F8614978E97Q37620069-8839D335-86AA-47AB-A82C-4DD779AF0814Q37622942-E98816B1-7358-47B7-A707-615092591586Q38613626-CC3A51F7-AC82-4A90-957F-8857E9B1A7AEQ38769347-8D177EE3-C711-4A85-B59C-8A41FD308AD3Q38824030-1046C8FA-E669-448A-8E5A-25CC3F259A79Q38984143-530AD765-DB7B-4868-BDA7-DDB9A723D935Q39807999-21F79001-7BF3-4BA0-B167-8F6F70B0F786Q40440059-88B79F03-39E7-4162-8813-5864F7E77A43Q41570633-233276B2-6C33-4949-A6ED-3EA87FED905EQ47323433-A99482EA-8819-48A2-8D0B-9FEAA808DAD5Q47586614-5859D74D-BCC5-412A-AD52-C75CF37F3AC6Q48223944-05725FC7-D0BA-43A7-83F4-C1305050E7EAQ53268976-969307E2-B13A-4CD6-B28D-D00277F35962Q54950358-B6438B32-3407-455D-85C1-6A90A0E3BD27Q55037632-0BA25DBC-265D-4E76-A319-0AF75C5784BCQ55258912-8AC674F4-0CBA-44FF-A994-2C51C595836AQ55282717-6E38BBAE-9548-4039-A914-D8B91812BF53Q58732209-3AE08BF8-ECCC-4E6B-8BDB-2393F8EDF9E5Q58793591-53A8E480-88DF-42D5-B062-89CB09E71ACE
P2860
Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening
description
2015 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2015年の論文
@ja
2015年論文
@yue
2015年論文
@zh-hant
2015年論文
@zh-hk
2015年論文
@zh-mo
2015年論文
@zh-tw
2015年论文
@wuu
2015年论文
@zh
2015年论文
@zh-cn
name
Comparison of Clinical and Aut ...... ion and Supplemental Screening
@en
type
label
Comparison of Clinical and Aut ...... ion and Supplemental Screening
@en
prefLabel
Comparison of Clinical and Aut ...... ion and Supplemental Screening
@en
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Comparison of Clinical and Aut ...... ion and Supplemental Screening
@en
P2093
Aaron D Norman
Amir P Mahmoudzadeh
Carrie B Hruska
Christopher G Scott
Dana H Whaley
Fang Fang Wu
John Heine
John Shepherd
Karla Kerlikowske
Kathleen R Brandt
P2860
P304
P356
10.1148/RADIOL.2015151261
P407
P577
2015-12-22T00:00:00Z