A critical evaluation of the volume, relevance and quality of evidence submitted by the tobacco industry to oppose standardised packaging of tobacco products.
about
How does the alcohol industry attempt to influence marketing regulations? A systematic reviewThe revision of the 2014 European tobacco products directive: an analysis of the tobacco industry's attempts to 'break the health silo'Representation and misrepresentation of scientific evidence in contemporary tobacco regulation: a review of tobacco industry submissions to the UK Government consultation on standardised packagingExposing and addressing tobacco industry conduct in low-income and middle-income countries.Evaluation of Nine Consensus Indices in Delphi Foresight Research and Their Dependency on Delphi Survey Characteristics: A Simulation Study and Debate on Delphi Design and Interpretation'It will harm business and increase illicit trade': an evaluation of the relevance, quality and transparency of evidence submitted by transnational tobacco companies to the UK consultation on standardised packaging 2012.The Policy Dystopia Model: An Interpretive Analysis of Tobacco Industry Political Activity.Standardised tobacco packaging: a health policy case study of corporate conflict expansion and adaptationControlling corporate influence in health policy making? An assessment of the implementation of article 5.3 of the World Health Organization framework convention on tobacco control.Tobacco industry-funded research on standardised packaging: there are none so blind as those who will not see!Rhetoric and the law, or the law of rhetoric: How countries oppose novel tobacco control measures at the World Trade Organization.Is the illicit cigarette market really growing? The tobacco industry's misleading math trick.Evidentiary Support in Public Comments to the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products.
P2860
Q26801879-FD9F9099-89F6-468F-B44A-63C45BC5FE34Q28606726-0B01A28E-1171-4764-918C-01631869B560Q28660690-38019CF3-6BE3-4C14-AAEF-3A0533B50FD7Q35246441-F8C9EBC8-A4C8-430E-BAF2-6131412ACDCFQ35745080-D5C760BA-DEDC-4EDC-A2C3-2B4BFBD88764Q35793441-3950602B-0493-44D8-93F3-16DCFEEC705FQ36138429-307FF6BE-C1EC-4B87-BF8B-59C5F8BF4A51Q37356263-61DFBCB2-F9A4-4323-B08E-35C17C2AFFF9Q37690078-6FB3608F-89AC-47BC-88F3-F631062C1E19Q38973188-2712AC01-40B0-4D7E-8096-4C5206F84117Q41383190-EB0E2582-3AD4-4743-A34E-A9B0776BE33EQ50909713-A01799C2-5874-4BB8-BA91-FC14CF547B4AQ53305826-6E44C890-3278-4741-BBAB-2966FE4B55A0
P2860
A critical evaluation of the volume, relevance and quality of evidence submitted by the tobacco industry to oppose standardised packaging of tobacco products.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on 12 February 2014
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
A critical evaluation of the v ...... packaging of tobacco products.
@en
A critical evaluation of the v ...... packaging of tobacco products.
@nl
type
label
A critical evaluation of the v ...... packaging of tobacco products.
@en
A critical evaluation of the v ...... packaging of tobacco products.
@nl
prefLabel
A critical evaluation of the v ...... packaging of tobacco products.
@en
A critical evaluation of the v ...... packaging of tobacco products.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
A critical evaluation of the v ...... packaging of tobacco products.
@en
P2093
Jenny L Hatchard
Karen A Evans-Reeves
Selda Ulucanlar
P2860
P304
P356
10.1136/BMJOPEN-2013-003757
P577
2014-02-12T00:00:00Z