Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation.
about
Exploring psychosis and bipolar disorder in women: a critical review of the qualitative literatureEngaging Older Adults in Health Care Decision-Making: A Realist Synthesis.Using Best-Worst Scaling to Investigate Preferences in Health CareWhat matters to patients? A systematic review of preferences for medication-associated outcomes in mental disordersInvolvement of the end user: exploration of older people's needs and preferences for a wearable fall detection device - a qualitative descriptive studyAmplifying Each Patient's Voice: A Systematic Review of Multi-criteria Decision Analyses Involving Patients.Implementing strategies in consumer and community engagement in health care: results of a large-scale, scoping meta-review.SMS text pre-notification and delivery of reminder e-mails to increase response rates to postal questionnaires in the SUSPEND trial: a factorial design, randomised controlled trial.Involving patient in the early stages of health technology assessment (HTA): a study protocolWhat are the key ingredients for effective public involvement in health care improvement and policy decisions? A randomized trial process evaluation.A comparison of analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis methods in assessing treatment alternatives for stroke rehabilitation.Consumer involvement in systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research.The use of research evidence on patient preferences in pharmaceutical coverage decisions and clinical practice guideline development: exploratory study into current state of play and potential barriers."Best fit" framework synthesis: refining the methodPublic preferences for engagement in Health Technology Assessment decision-making: protocol of a mixed methods study.Estimating the value of medical treatments to patients using probabilistic multi criteria decision analysis.Pharmaco-economic evaluation of antibiotic therapy strategies in DRG-based healthcare systems - a new approach.Finding Qualitative Research Evidence for Health Technology Assessment.Patients' preferences for attributes related to health care services at hospitals in Amhara Region, northern Ethiopia: a discrete choice experiment.A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research.Preferences for engagement in health technology assessment decision-making: a nominal group technique with members of the public.Facilitating and inhibiting factors for long-term involvement of patients at outcome conferences--lessons learnt from a decade of collaboration in OMERACT: a qualitative studyNew insights into public perceptions of cancer.Do not forget the professional--the value of the FIRST model for guiding the structural involvement of patients in rheumatology research.What makes a compliant Phase III and pre-launch patient advocacy strategy?Importance of hemodialysis-related outcomes: comparison of ratings by a self-help group, clinicians, and health technology assessment authors with those by a large reference group of patientsRole of patient and public participation in health technology assessment and coverage decisions.Early assessment of medical technologies to inform product development and market access: a review of methods and applications.Patient aspects: a review of fifty-eight Danish HTA reports.Multi-criteria development and incorporation into decision tools for health technology adoption.Quantitative patient preference evidence for health technology assessment: a case study.Responsiveness of the EQ-5D to clinical change: is the patient experience adequately represented?The patient perspective of diabetes care: a systematic review of stated preference research.The use of research evidence on patient preferences in health care decision-making: issues, controversies and moving forward.Patient perspective in health technology assessment of pharmaceuticals in Finland.Understanding the role of patient organizations in health technology assessment.Barriers and facilitators influencing ethical evaluation in health technology assessment.Stated and Revealed Preferences for Funding New High-Cost Cancer Drugs: A Critical Review of the Evidence from Patients, the Public and Payers.Patient and Public Involvement in the Development of Healthcare Guidance: An Overview of Current Methods and Future Challenges.Development and Pretesting of a Questionnaire to Assess Patient Experiences and Satisfaction with Medications (PESaM Questionnaire).
P2860
Q26864949-F31DCB45-5974-4FCE-953C-AD03E0F9B7E3Q27335312-5EBBC82C-4874-4429-9B62-AC515FC12B99Q28072872-E26C0CF3-B3B3-4651-8DCA-4AA2D5EC4E03Q28080858-061F8E3F-6781-4AC9-B711-844917899CF3Q30366225-C872336E-1654-47A5-9492-A799B4A109ACQ30396161-6A264CA1-C945-40E2-9F35-A8EA9711CE9FQ30588311-ADFBAA68-56FF-4F36-8CF0-27CC38C15437Q30657000-0947374A-75BC-40C7-95EE-F66EF217B48FQ33812977-948E4F3D-1674-4E9E-965D-3DA3CB99C07FQ33872198-0EB5575E-39C1-4852-90F3-944EC32D5336Q34241819-45EDE8CF-20D8-4FD8-BE22-930214B13C4AQ34258694-B3222C6E-7E7E-4212-BEA3-72D792C02990Q34499510-78A76CAA-7DCA-41F8-A9DB-0DD568D4DBA6Q34622418-420482D7-C58F-4426-A65B-C8EC90A56F83Q35689085-CEB2D836-B5D4-49CB-A522-1009F1476B78Q35857625-A61BE53B-E14F-47E6-B52F-5A8CF43BF2C3Q35959563-15435608-9D89-4710-AC33-25AF24E94E55Q36000229-73EE138D-4343-4C81-BA5E-C039C96190C4Q36072631-B367F002-7591-49F6-A94C-7BE6F6C0CB0AQ36111116-2F882FB3-1218-46D2-B06C-7792E11F412EQ36559477-FEF2EEF1-46C6-4E4B-AC7E-502A517A9D30Q37121643-4CA435A2-D2E7-4B93-8078-90FD4AF984B7Q37154933-EED1F1BA-2E01-482B-BF2F-4BEC799D6965Q37333319-00633405-80F1-4CA8-80D3-C2C02267D51AQ37504247-F777D81A-6B57-4014-AEFD-CE2A137DD11EQ37518373-E19AAA7D-DA0A-48E7-B504-939A734062B4Q37847153-9D0E7EEB-73E4-48EF-8244-5136529C0DD5Q37923478-AEC9155F-EFB8-49D3-8BBC-2B11D91D6ED2Q37946536-DDE42F88-75DC-4990-8F12-FDC3019538D3Q38117161-E0694CCE-4DEE-44D1-B32A-204049600FEFQ38122247-D97BF69B-F446-4528-BB0C-71241C8C251AQ38185481-457424DD-6D06-4C01-AC08-FA21802A70BFQ38201315-F01C4A58-D751-4DFF-ABAB-8FB5A93568B1Q38241075-2B14BDC2-B001-4EFF-AF36-A6574FFC2A11Q38241223-A9E9AC1B-F4D3-419D-9B5E-A117E02A08BFQ38388843-F435F5A4-49EC-46CD-B586-AAE5919B29B2Q38548012-20141817-F448-4ED0-BF85-0396C213CC55Q38586798-B5C0635E-E58D-41D6-8A34-D10066B18F9CQ38796861-424C9E21-CE4A-44D6-8596-798CC9934FE6Q38867819-9ED82CDC-1059-4D6A-819D-1AFC48220590
P2860
Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@pt
bilimsel makale
@tr
scientific article published on July 2010
@en
vedecký článok
@sk
vetenskaplig artikel
@sv
videnskabelig artikel
@da
vědecký článek
@cs
name
Patients' perspectives in heal ...... vidence and fair deliberation.
@en
Patients' perspectives in heal ...... vidence and fair deliberation.
@nl
type
label
Patients' perspectives in heal ...... vidence and fair deliberation.
@en
Patients' perspectives in heal ...... vidence and fair deliberation.
@nl
prefLabel
Patients' perspectives in heal ...... vidence and fair deliberation.
@en
Patients' perspectives in heal ...... vidence and fair deliberation.
@nl
P2093
P2860
P1476
Patients' perspectives in heal ...... vidence and fair deliberation.
@en
P2093
Alessandra Lo Scalzo
Ann Single
Helle Ploug Hansen
Javier Gracia
Jean Mossman
Karen Facey
P2860
P304
P356
10.1017/S0266462310000395
P577
2010-07-01T00:00:00Z