Patient-based health technology assessment: a vision of the future.
about
Using Best-Worst Scaling to Investigate Preferences in Health CareIntroducing patient perspective in health technology assessment at the local level.Involving patient in the early stages of health technology assessment (HTA): a study protocolPatient reported outcomes: looking beyond the label claim.Involving patients in HTA activities at local level: a study protocol based on the collaboration between researchers and knowledge users.The use of research evidence on patient preferences in pharmaceutical coverage decisions and clinical practice guideline development: exploratory study into current state of play and potential barriers.The Cost-Utility Analysis of PET-Scan in Diagnosis and Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma in Iran.A descriptive review on methods to prioritize outcomes in a health care context.Tailored e-Health services for the dementia care setting: a pilot study of 'eHealthMonitor'.Estimating the value of medical treatments to patients using probabilistic multi criteria decision analysis.A model for priority setting of health technology assessment: the experience of AHP-TOPSIS combination approachThe health systems' priority setting criteria for selecting health technologies: A systematic review of the current evidence.Patients' preferences for attributes related to health care services at hospitals in Amhara Region, northern Ethiopia: a discrete choice experiment.Patients' willingness to accept the risks and benefits of new treatments for chronic hepatitis C virus infection.Do not forget the professional--the value of the FIRST model for guiding the structural involvement of patients in rheumatology research.Introducing the patient's perspective in hospital health technology assessment (HTA): the views of HTA producers, hospital managers and patients.Promoting patient empowerment in the healthcare system: highlighting the need for patient-centered drug policy.Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: a route to robust evidence and fair deliberation.Role of patient and public participation in health technology assessment and coverage decisions.Public and patient involvement at the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.Can patients diagnosed with schizophrenia complete choice-based conjoint analysis tasks?Patient-reported outcome measures: are they patient-generated, patient-centred or patient-valued?Integrating evidence on patient preferences in healthcare policy decisions: protocol of the patient-VIP studyQuantitative patient preference evidence for health technology assessment: a case study.Patient preferences for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a scoping review.The patient perspective of diabetes care: a systematic review of stated preference research.The use of research evidence on patient preferences in health care decision-making: issues, controversies and moving forward.Patient and clinician's ratings of improvement in methadone-maintained patients: Differing perspectives?Patient and Public Involvement in the Development of Healthcare Guidance: An Overview of Current Methods and Future Challenges.Meeting the Challenges of Intervention Research in Health Science: An Argument for a Multimethod Research Approach.A pilot study to identify areas for further improvements in patient and public involvement in health technology assessments for medicines.Identifying patient-relevant endpoints among individuals with schizophrenia: an application of patient-centered health technology assessment.Harnessing the potential to quantify public preferences for healthcare priorities through citizens' juries.PUBLIC AND PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION.The value of quantitative patient preferences in regulatory benefit-risk assessmentComparison of four contingent valuation methods to estimate the economic value of a pneumococcal vaccine in Bangladesh.Pfizer-sponsored satellite symposium at the European Haemophilia Consortium (EHC) congress. Understanding health outcomes: focus on haemophilia.Exploring qualitative research synthesis: the role of patients' perspectives in health policy design and decision making.TAKING PATIENT HETEROGENEITY AND PREFERENCES INTO ACCOUNT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS.Improving the quality of discrete-choice experiments in health: how can we assess validity and reliability?
P2860
Q28072872-08D51052-4EB2-4BA9-9D0D-7DAC7B06398EQ33423265-BFCBBB97-4538-4AE0-8950-8E51A84C8029Q33812977-8A411AD3-5DF7-46C1-AD95-9BE8B51778C2Q34114747-03E73255-5827-4461-A0B1-7E5BE158A1A1Q34128588-4CF0707E-5B61-475B-B7B9-9F581233637BQ34499510-0010AFA7-A7F4-47A1-9B69-875B7B11FC47Q34991745-D8C9BE7B-61EC-4781-A04E-E103269D259AQ35231568-F60DB759-380D-40DD-B2BB-098E2AF1ADF0Q35717429-3208E492-1123-4363-A708-8D601508C495Q35857625-720A9D71-ADAA-4E95-8003-253F992823D7Q35986702-DEA7BF5C-D1E4-466F-9582-164C30A883B7Q36070736-916E722C-2FBE-4BA6-8298-9198A29A2C0DQ36072631-A1F98DE9-66B2-4383-B926-2E00B06C7687Q37021514-4989FE3A-C62E-4F7F-AD16-87515FDC887AQ37333319-4787C601-A750-44D9-9838-8F7FA06911D3Q37333691-CEEF0B79-1CF3-4D45-B08D-25BDEF7AB5F4Q37763115-8284D256-C506-4540-A745-14C3AEB29D5EQ37768242-FF68F5A4-888A-4D19-87E3-B9EFF57D1CF4Q37847153-030CB8A4-5D59-490D-B8F8-201EDE173C15Q37902193-30A64CFE-7208-4420-951C-9566FD501CFDQ37945332-BB5CD419-9618-4061-90B2-536224EB78F0Q38074478-FAE597C2-0466-429D-85A3-C73BDF252660Q38113861-A619F8F9-CB81-4AD8-966F-274D913C0E4BQ38122247-67AFDCAB-609C-4096-B594-2982EF76C16DQ38148000-11C57503-74A0-4D30-B65E-3136AE448E31Q38201315-A23BB0D5-97E9-45D4-BD53-0750572F9DE3Q38241075-60F358F3-D8DB-4DA9-9BA1-16F87580F876Q38495431-F265B93F-1C25-4441-8FE7-94C0C0881495Q38796861-A98076E5-3FE8-4858-B18D-7C59CC9C2889Q38939706-BE80E47C-0F80-4B1C-AA68-9DF154F765D8Q39584764-C32DAF9E-837E-41A4-AE50-3265E01A8F95Q40012236-2C48D3B8-15C5-44CD-A601-8F8C58690C2CQ40214278-70197BFE-96B0-42CB-AB15-AB476761FB50Q40565170-F4F078AF-939E-4387-A4BB-324B93D09619Q41504009-0A1AA89A-CF40-45FD-89FE-9755943BBAC5Q42599058-4CE70521-BAD3-4594-A942-0B3DAF589514Q45886531-29B07763-3E7B-4A08-9D05-3282ED16B630Q46966489-2E22B140-DA79-4B04-9A25-50C68B3FC5C5Q47549181-6516143D-12D6-4F6A-A4A7-FCE5672D9B33Q47883113-A9953D7F-CFFC-4901-9723-6B43606A616F
P2860
Patient-based health technology assessment: a vision of the future.
description
2007 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2007年の論文
@ja
2007年論文
@yue
2007年論文
@zh-hant
2007年論文
@zh-hk
2007年論文
@zh-mo
2007年論文
@zh-tw
2007年论文
@wuu
2007年论文
@zh
2007年论文
@zh-cn
name
Patient-based health technology assessment: a vision of the future.
@en
type
label
Patient-based health technology assessment: a vision of the future.
@en
prefLabel
Patient-based health technology assessment: a vision of the future.
@en
P2860
P1476
Patient-based health technology assessment: a vision of the future.
@en
P2093
Christopher Jones
John F P Bridges
P2860
P356
10.1017/S0266462307051549
P577
2007-01-01T00:00:00Z