Empirical evidence of the importance of comparative studies of diagnostic test accuracy.
about
Tests to assist in the diagnosis of keratinocyte skin cancers in adults: a generic protocolTests to assist in the diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma in adults: a generic protocolSymptoms, ultrasound imaging and biochemical markers alone or in combination for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in women with symptoms suspicious of ovarian cancerOptic nerve head and fibre layer imaging for diagnosing glaucomaEndoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stonesEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus intraoperative cholangiography for diagnosis of common bile duct stonesTests for detecting strabismus in children age 1 to 6 years in the communityMagnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and ultrasonography for assessing rotator cuff tears in people with shoulder pain for whom surgery is being consideredDepression rating scales for detection of major depression in people with dementiaDiagnostic accuracy of biochemical tests of placental function versus ultrasound assessment of fetal size for stillbirth and small-for-gestational-age infantsMANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Imaging for the diagnosis of malignancy in incidentally discovered adrenal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysisGenoType® MTBDRsl assay for resistance to second-line anti-tuberculosis drugsIndividual patient data meta-analysis of diagnostic studies: opportunities and challenges.Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviewsRapid diagnostic tests for typhoid and paratyphoid (enteric) feverMeta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies in mental health.An assessment of the characteristics and quality of diagnostic accuracy studies for positron emission tomography conducted in Japan: a systematic review.The diagnostic accuracy of chest ultrasound for CT-detected radiographic consolidation in hospitalised adults with acute respiratory failure: a systematic review.Antenatal magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasound for predicting neonatal macrosomia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.A general framework for comparative Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic studies.Accuracy of combinations of visual inspection using acetic acid or lugol iodine to detect cervical precancer: a meta-analysis.Summarising and validating test accuracy results across multiple studies for use in clinical practiceBiomarkers Differentiating Dementia with Lewy Bodies from Other Dementias: A Meta-Analysis.Field Validation of SYBR Green- and TaqMan-Based Real-Time PCR Using Biopsy and Swab Samples To Diagnose American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis in an Area Where Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis Is Endemic.Meta-analysis for the comparison of two diagnostic tests to a common gold standard: A generalized linear mixed model approach.Methods for the joint meta-analysis of multiple tests.Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review.Multiple Score Comparison: a network meta-analysis approach to comparison and external validation of prognostic scores.Meta-analysis for the comparison of two diagnostic tests-A new approach based on copulas.Guidance for deriving and presenting percentage study weights in meta-analysis of test accuracy studies.METRIC (MREnterography or ulTRasound in Crohn's disease): a study protocol for a multicentre, non-randomised, single-arm, prospective comparison study of magnetic resonance enterography and small bowel ultrasound compared to a reference standard in t
P2860
Q24186708-54DFED6F-A620-46DE-8BCA-218B452A48C0Q24186719-BAE1C2E5-A763-4A0A-AB3A-A845D8E21A65Q24187351-18490143-03E6-4E80-B048-59F55F15F094Q24187597-1FAAC773-D38E-4DE9-9F94-3DBA852B048EQ24187882-360A6928-56E4-4FE9-A3D5-ABDD9972EC97Q24187893-4528FCE5-1096-4392-A661-06640D84F609Q24194955-266D8293-AEFD-43D6-A21E-317B347C9E9AQ24197960-5036EBF8-D2F6-47E4-82D6-2CFBA44687C5Q26470556-02F60DB6-860F-4FDB-9D5D-3EECA53B833EQ26471578-C27A96A6-717C-4E1E-981F-605C43AF734CQ26743458-CF3A44E3-C6F2-44FD-AEDE-6117FCA02249Q28068545-C6612BAB-E005-4E8E-A5E8-EAE714A87A98Q30632404-0BA3E96C-6053-417E-8568-594C7B16B25AQ31140786-3E0B8CA3-AC0A-40CD-AC8B-C2BBA5D81A5AQ33761307-8048154B-52FB-4058-B5CA-5A6F00D5F9E4Q34497278-2499230F-36F7-49FA-BE0D-E6E573F4FE2CQ35265459-3012BEEF-0D47-4618-AC2D-E8FEFF55E137Q35635781-CB0BBF38-DA00-4294-B986-16018EC9F4EEQ35725141-8545BD41-0827-4B2A-9986-29D1E45ED5EBQ35758192-535F190D-B960-4B6D-BF36-5930AB1E4770Q36398896-E0B4B664-72FD-4EC9-ABD4-EE76C6C4161EQ37152283-B47D0B03-8F19-4326-9668-6E21E8D3385CQ40239769-297EF68D-8E3D-46EA-827D-0633038607AFQ40436640-52E24F3C-0054-47D9-B9B8-5B30EF2BF042Q40637628-6F7E4E7D-348A-4D35-867D-2D00E0CE1098Q40859927-67961D49-AFB6-4758-BDB0-E8FABA440D55Q42373529-0CF494E7-BD6D-4895-A261-4D049D32B4A7Q47161643-A6DFF10C-0CB9-4E50-BDD4-D7BDD43CFBC2Q48203038-6B8273AF-647F-4076-ACD7-4BBBFFC35208Q48345507-AB612C24-1C5F-4DAC-9A03-12EA06F0E123Q57943388-C4837939-B009-4165-B4AD-B33E970D6251
P2860
Empirical evidence of the importance of comparative studies of diagnostic test accuracy.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articol științific
@ro
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@gl
artigo científico
@pt
artigo científico
@pt-br
artikel ilmiah
@id
artikull shkencor
@sq
artículo científico
@es
name
Empirical evidence of the importance of comparative studies of diagnostic test accuracy.
@en
type
label
Empirical evidence of the importance of comparative studies of diagnostic test accuracy.
@en
prefLabel
Empirical evidence of the importance of comparative studies of diagnostic test accuracy.
@en
P50
P1476
Empirical evidence of the importance of comparative studies of diagnostic test accuracy.
@en
P304
P356
10.7326/0003-4819-158-7-201304020-00006
P407
P577
2013-04-01T00:00:00Z