Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
about
Reporting and methodological quality of meta-analyses in urological literatureIdentifying approaches for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews: a descriptive study.Non-surgical interventions for adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: an overview of systematic reviews.Reporting quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupunctureFailure of a numerical quality assessment scale to identify potential risk of bias in a systematic review: a comparison study.Reproducibility of Search Strategies Is Poor in Systematic Reviews Published in High-Impact Pediatrics, Cardiology and Surgery Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study.Poor methodological quality and reporting standards of systematic reviews in burn care management.Longitudinal analysis of reporting and quality of systematic reviews in high-impact surgical journals.Are child-centric aspects in newborn and child health systematic review and meta-analysis protocols and reports adequately reported?-two systematic reviews.Do systematic reviews on pediatric topics need special methodological considerations?Methodological quality of systematic reviews addressing femoroacetabular impingement.Do surgery journals insist on reporting by CONSORT and PRISMA? A follow-up survey of 'instructions to authors'.Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine.Update on the Methodological Quality of Research Published in The American Journal of Sports Medicine: Comparing 2011-2013 to 10 and 20 Years Prior.Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality.Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews.The landscape of systematic reviews in urology (1998 to 2015): an assessment of methodological quality.Comment on Chen et al.: Patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsA survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals.Compliance of systematic reviews in ophthalmology with the PRISMA statement.Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.Intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection in treating knee osteoarthritis: assessing risk of bias in systematic reviews with ROBIS tool.La version franco-canadienne de l'outil Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR).Trusting systematic reviews and meta-analyses: all that glitters is not gold!
P2860
Q33589106-68E74EB1-EC87-4B79-82B0-8EA625117FE1Q33814405-CE546F2B-1B7A-4A0E-884F-63B5F89E88F8Q34421417-FE28C21C-91AF-4EE2-A1AB-A9F123AB394DQ35421116-39A97DD9-1BAF-4C6F-BB1C-D0D40C9024EFQ35655217-5BA528AE-779D-4952-85AD-197C49A1125CQ36145041-B49F550F-00DD-4D5F-8233-C95B3C31DCA4Q36227743-8CAFCF1E-2832-4E20-AAC0-DB5CC1F11628Q36230228-E35DEC66-7C57-47CD-BC05-557AD4F1DBF8Q36297521-57CC706C-9930-4AD2-ACDB-E9B9C0B31781Q36297526-C0418618-9872-4490-A18A-B8EB9D2616BFQ38231148-2E32DBCB-4207-40E1-B2BB-92F6A7100ED7Q38356874-EEDF7C53-51B1-4E53-8D52-AF74F2AF7F33Q38433687-39F98338-5E94-4CF9-A224-D17446E17A84Q38552406-E9D992CC-A851-4C4B-9F28-723827F0F0ADQ38673534-B06601BF-E2F6-4500-8550-E22EFDC0CF54Q39002263-BD8A3014-E0D9-4FDA-B4B5-F58E032D1D3CQ39406932-4378021E-58CF-4F50-A5D7-A4E6C742C052Q42648635-3FD566EC-0FAC-4013-8600-90C5F398937CQ47101677-9A47F000-8C4C-4B65-AB08-24414EB68D8EQ47145526-A03A9B46-1C67-443A-97D0-23792FD57A65Q47159405-A6FC70E7-E2C1-4AE6-83FB-6D051D318A4CQ48167331-0F6107FA-FAC6-466B-B9BC-47583DD1FD7FQ50280889-9989A381-3EC7-41E1-833B-B4AE3A91A5ABQ53199982-AB6FD245-B835-44FA-A487-7413DD8D3F76
P2860
Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
description
article científic
@ca
article scientifique
@fr
articol științific
@ro
articolo scientifico
@it
artigo científico
@gl
artigo científico
@pt
artigo científico
@pt-br
artikel ilmiah
@id
artikull shkencor
@sq
artículo científico
@es
name
Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
@en
type
label
Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
@en
prefLabel
Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
@en
P356
P1476
Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
@en
P2093
Joel J Gagnier
Patrick J Kellam
P304
P356
10.2106/JBJS.L.00597
P407
P577
2013-06-01T00:00:00Z