Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference?
about
Strategies to Prevent or Reduce Gender Bias in Peer Review of Research Grants: A Rapid Scoping ReviewProgrammatic Efforts at the National Institutes of Health to Promote and Support the Careers of Women in Biomedical Science.Reply to "Funding by Lottery: Political Problems and Research Opportunities".Gender Differences in Receipt of National Institutes of Health R01 Grants Among Junior Faculty at an Academic Medical Center: The Role of Connectivity, Rank, and Research Productivity.Sex Differences in Faculty Rank Among Academic Cardiologists in the United States.Are Female Applicants Disadvantaged in National Institutes of Health Peer Review? Combining Algorithmic Text Mining and Qualitative Methods to Detect Evaluative Differences in R01 Reviewers' Critiques.Advancement of Women in the Biomedical Workforce: Insights for Success.Striving for Gender Equity in Academic Medicine Careers: A Call to Action.Twelve tips to promote gender equity in international academic medicine.Culturally inclusive STEM education.What is in a Pronoun?: Why Gender-fair Language Matters.Women Are Less Likely Than Men to Be Full Professors in Cardiology: Why Does This Happen and How Can We Fix It?Sex Differences in Academic Rank and Publication Rate at Top-Ranked US Neurology Programs.Who does she think she is? Women, leadership and the 'B'(ias) word.Grant-Writing Bootcamp: An Intervention to Enhance the Research Capacity of Academic Women in STEM.Influences for Gender Disparity in Academic Psychiatry in the United States.Assessment of potential bias in research grant peer review in Canada.Positive bias for European men in applications for faculty position at Karolinska Institutet
P2860
Q28583537-A786CEC2-54D3-402A-BD54-07E291AA9F54Q37119636-842C9E55-509C-4523-80A0-B818BE56EF12Q37208413-7513E229-9A1C-4911-8113-43A609630A3DQ38644570-CE767D0D-C83A-4A4B-8E69-EC6D96901188Q38983094-280EFA58-B3D9-4508-AD5D-249A66CF9C47Q39172727-EC066296-162C-4079-A461-BEAD965BD3ABQ41920615-6318B425-A21B-4B66-91C5-EDC4CA5DC59AQ45036722-53410FDB-C22C-4011-999C-A48D6BC596C4Q47597836-305B2D28-0A58-4887-919E-62EC167161ABQ47639640-4EC4FF4E-7E31-413D-B68F-F15A9F6AB040Q49234095-C34DB7E2-5D78-4837-AEC8-A07EE7326ACDQ51019922-C8818773-9286-4EBE-AA21-A4DFA6D7D33CQ52322509-0963FC9C-F61A-4971-A5F1-30B9D6DC047DQ53482112-CA1074FA-4D0A-4DAB-8ED1-C89F9CC26340Q55083982-433FF679-944F-450E-B03F-34390E0446ECQ55268963-73447AA5-0877-40D4-8189-1D627F49BD90Q55365347-C696B783-0527-4F68-B38A-3032C8BE0A32Q58782358-3110A67B-BDA5-4813-BC05-CEB215FE80B5
P2860
Analysis of National Institutes of Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference?
description
2016 nî lūn-bûn
@nan
2016年の論文
@ja
2016年学术文章
@wuu
2016年学术文章
@zh-cn
2016年学术文章
@zh-hans
2016年学术文章
@zh-my
2016年学术文章
@zh-sg
2016年學術文章
@yue
2016年學術文章
@zh
2016年學術文章
@zh-hant
name
Analysis of National Institute ...... nvestigator Make a Difference?
@en
type
label
Analysis of National Institute ...... nvestigator Make a Difference?
@en
prefLabel
Analysis of National Institute ...... nvestigator Make a Difference?
@en
P2093
P2860
P1433
P1476
Analysis of National Institute ...... nvestigator Make a Difference?
@en
P2093
Aaron Potvien
Amarette Filut
Anna Kaatz
Anupama Bhattacharya
Molly Carnes
Renee Leatherberry
Wairimu Magua
Xiaojin Zhu
You-Geon Lee
P2860
P304
P356
10.1097/ACM.0000000000001272
P407
P577
2016-06-07T00:00:00Z